Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This is a GOOD Washington team
Comments
-
I don't care if you agree with me or not. In fact, I don't expect Doogs like you to agree with me.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
I'm right. That's all that matters.
-
UW deserves to be shit on for their loss. Going in you think you lose to a RELOADED Colorado or rejuvenated Stanford on the road. Not fucking Graham.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
And is it that the conference is worse than the other 4 or just that “we beat each other up in this conference.”
I watch the Stanford/Wazzu game and unfortunately it’s probably the former. -
How many wins did ND and Texas combine for last year? Good schedule for them this year. Great for them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still.
Good luck getting Texas to play a home and home with UW.
And of course, if I felt like doing research, I could shitpoast a bunch of other top 20 teams with shitty non conference schedules also. But yeah. SC is the norm. -
You're the idiot that said "No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year."Alexis said:
How many wins did ND and Texas combine for last year? Good schedule for them this year. Great for them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still.
Good luck getting Texas to play a home and home with UW.
And of course, if I felt like doing research, I could shitpoast a bunch of other top 20 teams with shitty non conference schedules also. But yeah. SC is the norm. -
And I just told you, give SC that same non conference schedule last year, and it would be shit.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're the idiot that said "No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year."Alexis said:
How many wins did ND and Texas combine for last year? Good schedule for them this year. Great for them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still.
Good luck getting Texas to play a home and home with UW.
And of course, if I felt like doing research, I could shitpoast a bunch of other top 20 teams with shitty non conference schedules also. But yeah. SC is the norm.
Now go fuck yourself -
There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
-
I never left the jungle.phineas said:There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
-
Charlie's in the trees!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I never left the jungle.phineas said:There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
-
ralph@TierbsHsotBoobs pls go -
Because you're stupidTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I never left the jungle.phineas said:There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
