Yuge Mellon post game
Comments
-
Careful. Most on here called Chip's offense a gimmick.whatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
-
our current offense is a fucking gimmick. Chip was usually was able to put points up on anyone his defenses just could not stop shitwhuggy said:
Careful. Most on here called Chip's offense a gimmick.whatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
-
So then create those types of teams and recruit those types of players.godawgst said:
Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASUwhatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level
Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.
That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month. -
Hugh - post some nudies of Lisa G or STFU.godawgst said:
Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASUwhatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level
Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.
That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month. -
Untrue.whuggy said:
Careful. Most on here called Chip's offense a gimmick.whatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
-
true.... but how much are we really looking for from our offense?godawgst said:
Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASUwhatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level
Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.
That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month.
20 points while controlling the clock wins every game left on our schedule. Running the ball 65+% of the time accomplishes that. All we have to do is avoid ASU type games. If we had just used this gameplan against them they would have worn down a lot earlier than the fourth quarter. -
Chip completed the Oregon 35 year plan to lose a national championship game before Mariota.godawgst said:
Stanford had Andrew Luck and 8 OL/TE's that played on Sundays. The only guy who starts for them on this team blew his knee out against ASUwhatshouldicareabout said:
You mean like Chip Kelly's offense at Oregon that averaged 300y/g over half a decade? Or like Stanford which went to 4 straight BCS bowls?YellowSnow said:Doesn't think 58 rushes is a sustainable model for winning modern era PAC 12 games. Maybe not every single game. But fuck QB perspective on this topic. No reason not to run 45 plus a game unless the other team proves they can stop it. Only 3 things can happen when you pass and 2 of them aren't good.
Chip Kelly had better OL than people give him a credit for, a Heisman winner in Mariotta, skill wr's that all ran like Ross, and an offense system that no one had seen before at the P5 level
Hugh's point was unless you have those types of teams you can't do that in today's cfb over the course of a season in a P5 conference and I would agree with that.
That being said, you can tell he knows there is major issues going on with Jake and the passing game that aren't getting fixed in the next month. -
I thought this thread was going to be about huge tits.
It kind of is, in a way. But what cunt would click on this thread... -
MOTHERFUCKING THIS. I wanted to scream listening to that segment. Say "different era" or "modern game" one more time and I swear I'll do something drastic. If your personnel is suited towards running the ball IDGAF what fucking year it is or what a majority of teams do. The fucking calendar is not gonna tackle anybody and a majority of teams are coached by vainglorious mouth-breathers. Jesus.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:He's probably right, but it's better than passing 75% of the time like they did every other game.
I'm not gonna call for death but I will cautiously suggest playing russian roulette with a semi-auto. -
Wild exaggerations are always fun.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:He's probably right, but it's better than passing 75% of the time like they did every other game.
