Do they actually believe their own lie?
So why are all these multi-millionaires insulting the country that made them wildly rich and creating a national (even international) crisis about police brutality when, with rare exceptions, it's no longer there? Do they actually believe their own lie?
https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2017/09/26/kneeling-self-deceiving-lie/
Comments
-
I have no idea why people are upset -
More kids than that killed last weekend in Chicago alone.
#dupedbyfakeoutrage -
I hope a cop shoots you in the face.
For no reason
Today.
-
We both know that just isn't going to happen. But you keep that Viagra Rage goin.
-
AZDuck said:
TWENTY since 2012. Twenty.
4 per year.
Last year 762 black-on-black homicides in Chicago alone.
Lots of faux outrage. Or intentionally divisive media coverage. You decide.
(In before fucktards thinking like HondoFS. That doesn't make any of them right.)
Personally, these two pissed me off the most. Especially the choke-out over a couple cartons of cigarettes - and taxation.
I have no idea why people are upset
I have no idea why people aren't more upset about issues that impact exponentially more people. -
Hey fuckface - you get up in the morning, check Infowars and Breitbart and then drag your drippy fucking cunt to HH to shitpost like a faggot. Every fucking day.
A cop would be doing the world a favor by shooting you in the face. And nobody would protest because you're a cunt. -
I can't accept this outrage from you without a "dumb fucking donkey" bomb. It just isn't right.dflea said:Hey fuckface - you get up in the morning, check Infowars and Breitbart and then drag your drippy fucking cunt to HH to shitpost like a faggot. Every fucking day.
A cop would be doing the world a favor by shooting you in the face. And nobody would protest because you're a cunt. -
Couple of things.
1- lots more than 20. That's just the twenty whose names appear on that poster.
2- what's with the morality bait-n-switch? Black people are getting murdered in Chicago. That's a Chicago problem, that's a law-and-order problem. Crime is generally down in the US right now (Chicago excepted).
There's less outrage about crime because it usually isn't being done by agents of the government. Duh. People tend to get more outraged about law-abiding black people getting blown away at traffic stops or suffocated on a Staten Island sidewalk by police than they do about two drug dealers shooting each other in turf wars.
Shocking, I know.
But the thing is - who the fuck are you to tell someone what to get pissed about and what not to get pissed about? You want to protest about the murder rate in Chicago? Be my fucking guest. You want to be outraged about Killary's email server? Go for it. That's your right as a citizen.
-
I've never been outraged by anything on the internet. But I agree that doogie should always be called a dumb fucking donkey.
-
Of course not.doogie said:We both know that just isn't going to happen. But you keep that Viagra Rage goin.
You're white. -
Hi.pawz said:AZDuck said:
TWENTY since 2012. Twenty.
4 per year.
Last year 762 black-on-black homicides in Chicago alone.
Lots of faux outrage. Or intentionally divisive media coverage. You decide.
(In before fucktards thinking like HondoFS. That doesn't make any of them right.)
Personally, these two pissed me off the most. Especially the choke-out over a couple cartons of cigarettes - and taxation.
I have no idea why people are upset
I have no idea why people aren't more upset about issues that impact exponentially more people.
It's ok to be upset about both. -
Meanwhile you suck Rachel Maddow's cock and come here touting new fondue recipes, every day.
#triggerred -
AZDuck said:
Couple of things.
1- lots more than 20. That's just the twenty whose names appear on that poster.
On a scale between 20 and 786, where do you think that number actually lands. Hence the request for FBI statistics
2- what's with the morality bait-n-switch? Black people are getting murdered in Chicago. That's a Chicago problem, that's a law-and-order problem. Crime is generally down in the US right now (Chicago excepted).
This is the point I'm trying to drive home - and the ill intents of a divisive media.
There's less outrage about crime because it usually isn't being done by agents of the government. Duh. People tend to get more outraged about law-abiding black people getting blown away at traffic stops or suffocated on a Staten Island sidewalk by police than they do about two drug dealers shooting each other in turf wars.
Shocking, I know.
Agree.
But the thing is - who the fuck are you to tell someone what to get pissed about and what not to get pissed about? You want to protest about the murder rate in Chicago? Be my fucking guest. You want to be outraged about Killary's email server? Go for it. That's your right as a citizen.
Who is deciding morality? Morality is being determined by the purveyor of the news. In my perception, it's being done dishonestly, disingenuously and with an agenda that doesn't serve the best interests of the people.
The media certainly appears to be serving the interests of those who want to control the people - divide and conquer.
If this perception is wrong, the floor is yours counselor. -
I have been on the interwebs since roughly 1992 (war compuserve). People's heads have always exploded over tiny shit.
Rome burned while Nero fiddled.
We getting a couple damned good tunes played right now. A full fucking cacophony.
Pass the dark chocolate and graham crackers.
#s'mores
-
loldoogie said:Meanwhile you suck Rachel Maddow's cock and come here touting new fondue recipes, every day.
#triggerred
And you posted this in your own thread about people believing lies.
What a fucking cunt you are.
-
I'm glad you support protesting for white supremacy but hate peaceful protesting about police brutality. And you wonder why people call you racist.
-
Fuck off, simpleton. This bored is for functioning Adults and Backthepack
-
Someone struck a nerve. It's pathetic, take the same position. People should be able to peacefully protest. Whether you agree with the cause or not.doogie said:Fuck off, simpleton. This bored is for functioning Adults and Backthepack
-
Glad to see you're finally starting to agree with me.
... and you didn't even have to screem RATHITHST! or anything!
I'm making progress with you. Good. -
Blacks at 13% of the population are responsible for the majority of violent crime in the US. Rethink your over representation.AZDuck said:
I have no idea why people are upset -
The media is an extension of its viewership. It's private enterprise (for the most part) and it's going to give it users whatever content generates the most revenue. The current shit state of the media on the right and left is a symptom of a dumbed down populace that can't tell fact from fiction and is mostly looking for ammunition for social media and shit tier message board battles. Confirmation bias is a funny thing. People really hate questioning their belief system.pawz said:AZDuck said:Couple of things.
1- lots more than 20. That's just the twenty whose names appear on that poster.
On a scale between 20 and 786, where do you think that number actually lands. Hence the request for FBI statistics
2- what's with the morality bait-n-switch? Black people are getting murdered in Chicago. That's a Chicago problem, that's a law-and-order problem. Crime is generally down in the US right now (Chicago excepted).
This is the point I'm trying to drive home - and the ill intents of a divisive media.
There's less outrage about crime because it usually isn't being done by agents of the government. Duh. People tend to get more outraged about law-abiding black people getting blown away at traffic stops or suffocated on a Staten Island sidewalk by police than they do about two drug dealers shooting each other in turf wars.
Shocking, I know.
Agree.
But the thing is - who the fuck are you to tell someone what to get pissed about and what not to get pissed about? You want to protest about the murder rate in Chicago? Be my fucking guest. You want to be outraged about Killary's email server? Go for it. That's your right as a citizen.
Who is deciding morality? Morality is being determined by the purveyor of the news. In my perception, it's being done dishonestly, disingenuously and with an agenda that doesn't serve the best interests of the people.
The media certainly appears to be serving the interests of those who want to control the people - divide and conquer.
If this perception is wrong, the floor is yours counselor. -
FREE PUBdoogie said:Meanwhile you suck Rachel Maddow's cock and come here touting new fondue recipes, every day.
#triggerred -
In theory this is correct. In my estimation it's become very difficult to ascertain if the tail is wagging the dog or the dog is wagging the tail. I think there is another driver in-play that is meeting both aims - as you suggest and as I suggest.RedRocket said:
The media is an extension of its viewership. It's private enterprise (for the most part) and it's going to give it users whatever content generates the most revenue. The current shit state of the media on the right and left is a symptom of a dumbed down populace that can't tell fact from fiction and is mostly looking for ammunition for social media and shit tier message board battles. Confirmation bias is a funny thing. People really hate questioning their belief system.pawz said:AZDuck said:Couple of things.
1- lots more than 20. That's just the twenty whose names appear on that poster.
On a scale between 20 and 786, where do you think that number actually lands. Hence the request for FBI statistics
2- what's with the morality bait-n-switch? Black people are getting murdered in Chicago. That's a Chicago problem, that's a law-and-order problem. Crime is generally down in the US right now (Chicago excepted).
This is the point I'm trying to drive home - and the ill intents of a divisive media.
There's less outrage about crime because it usually isn't being done by agents of the government. Duh. People tend to get more outraged about law-abiding black people getting blown away at traffic stops or suffocated on a Staten Island sidewalk by police than they do about two drug dealers shooting each other in turf wars.
Shocking, I know.
Agree.
But the thing is - who the fuck are you to tell someone what to get pissed about and what not to get pissed about? You want to protest about the murder rate in Chicago? Be my fucking guest. You want to be outraged about Killary's email server? Go for it. That's your right as a citizen.
Who is deciding morality? Morality is being determined by the purveyor of the news. In my perception, it's being done dishonestly, disingenuously and with an agenda that doesn't serve the best interests of the people.
The media certainly appears to be serving the interests of those who want to control the people - divide and conquer.
If this perception is wrong, the floor is yours counselor.
Agree on the rest.
You haven't been around these parts much, but be sure to axe @dnc about confirmation bias. It's been covered.
-
Why are you here?doogie said:Fuck off, simpleton. This bored is for functioning Adults and Backthepack
-
Until black people stop being a disproportionate number of violent criminals then I'll give a fuck if a disproportionate number are shot.
-
Why does someone's personal income matter? Just because they are better at life than you doesn't mean their thoughts or opinions mean less.
-
Pitchfork51 said:
Until black people stop being a disproportionate number of violent criminals then I'll give a fuck if a disproportionate number are shot.
-
Because nothing is more racist than actual statistics.AZDuck said:Pitchfork51 said:Until black people stop being a disproportionate number of violent criminals then I'll give a fuck if a disproportionate number are shot.
-
Eh...That chart is meaningless when looking at the percentage of population by race. You would need to look at the percentage of police encounters by race. And to draw any real conclusion about that data, you would need to look at the percentage of crimes committed by race. And you would probably have to consider the kinds of crimes committed, how much of the shootings take place in known gang territory. The more likely answer, than what BLM is protesting or Colin Kappernick, is that police are too aggressive, militaristic, and basically are just as likely to shoot every race (not every cop, I am sure there are racists cops, but that data alone would not show a systemic racism problem).AZDuck said:
I have no idea why people are upset
Edit: Oddly enough, there is a similar statistical problem arises in just looking at the number of violent crimes committed by race. You see white supremacist use those crime number to try and show how black Americans are more violent. Yet those stats are also meaningless unless you consider other factors like rate of single mother hood and poverty. The above chart is sort of similar, but in reverse.
