Do they actually believe their own lie?
Comments
-
Hi.pawz said:AZDuck said:
TWENTY since 2012. Twenty.
4 per year.
Last year 762 black-on-black homicides in Chicago alone.
Lots of faux outrage. Or intentionally divisive media coverage. You decide.
(In before fucktards thinking like HondoFS. That doesn't make any of them right.)
Personally, these two pissed me off the most. Especially the choke-out over a couple cartons of cigarettes - and taxation.
I have no idea why people are upset
I have no idea why people aren't more upset about issues that impact exponentially more people.
It's ok to be upset about both. -
Meanwhile you suck Rachel Maddow's cock and come here touting new fondue recipes, every day.
#triggerred -
AZDuck said:
Couple of things.
1- lots more than 20. That's just the twenty whose names appear on that poster.
On a scale between 20 and 786, where do you think that number actually lands. Hence the request for FBI statistics
2- what's with the morality bait-n-switch? Black people are getting murdered in Chicago. That's a Chicago problem, that's a law-and-order problem. Crime is generally down in the US right now (Chicago excepted).
This is the point I'm trying to drive home - and the ill intents of a divisive media.
There's less outrage about crime because it usually isn't being done by agents of the government. Duh. People tend to get more outraged about law-abiding black people getting blown away at traffic stops or suffocated on a Staten Island sidewalk by police than they do about two drug dealers shooting each other in turf wars.
Shocking, I know.
Agree.
But the thing is - who the fuck are you to tell someone what to get pissed about and what not to get pissed about? You want to protest about the murder rate in Chicago? Be my fucking guest. You want to be outraged about Killary's email server? Go for it. That's your right as a citizen.
Who is deciding morality? Morality is being determined by the purveyor of the news. In my perception, it's being done dishonestly, disingenuously and with an agenda that doesn't serve the best interests of the people.
The media certainly appears to be serving the interests of those who want to control the people - divide and conquer.
If this perception is wrong, the floor is yours counselor. -
I have been on the interwebs since roughly 1992 (war compuserve). People's heads have always exploded over tiny shit.
Rome burned while Nero fiddled.
We getting a couple damned good tunes played right now. A full fucking cacophony.
Pass the dark chocolate and graham crackers.
#s'mores
-
loldoogie said:Meanwhile you suck Rachel Maddow's cock and come here touting new fondue recipes, every day.
#triggerred
And you posted this in your own thread about people believing lies.
What a fucking cunt you are.
-
I'm glad you support protesting for white supremacy but hate peaceful protesting about police brutality. And you wonder why people call you racist.
-
Fuck off, simpleton. This bored is for functioning Adults and Backthepack
-
Someone struck a nerve. It's pathetic, take the same position. People should be able to peacefully protest. Whether you agree with the cause or not.doogie said:Fuck off, simpleton. This bored is for functioning Adults and Backthepack
-
Glad to see you're finally starting to agree with me.
... and you didn't even have to screem RATHITHST! or anything!
I'm making progress with you. Good. -
Blacks at 13% of the population are responsible for the majority of violent crime in the US. Rethink your over representation.AZDuck said:
I have no idea why people are upset
