As i said pre-season...
Comments
-
I still can't get over how much puppy hates Coach Pete.
-
Puppy said year 3 would suck until after it happened then he was the only one who said UW was on track. Back when year 3 would suck it was year 4 where we would starting beating some ass, now it's not.
Pumpy just has to cover all his angles so he could say he told us so. Like when he "predicted" (conveinantly the predicition came AFTER it happened) Colorado would win the South last year. Puppy had UW losing every important game last year (Oregon, Stanford, WSU, Colorado etc) and now of course he's the only one that predicted year 3.
Consistency is key with pumpy. -
This!CuntWaffle said:Puppy said year 3 would suck until after it happened then he was the only one who said UW was on track. Back when year 3 would suck it was year 4 where we would starting beating some ass, now it's not.
Pumpy just has to cover all his angles so he could say he told us so. Like when he "predicted" (conveinantly the predicition came AFTER it happened) Colorado would win the South last year. Puppy had UW losing every important game last year (Oregon, Stanford, WSU, Colorado etc) and now of course he's the only one that predicted year 3.
Consistency is key with pumpy.
Puppy's poasting playbook:
1. Revise history
2. Contradict yourself
3. Spew nonsense
4. Throw enough shit against the wall and see if something sticks.
Feel free to add to the list. -
1) you dont need to mention ucla.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
2) i wish i could push you from the top row of 306 but im guessing youre too poor to afford seats. -
There are so many comments I want to make, but I'll behave myself.rodmansrage said:
1) you dont need to mention ucla.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
2) i wish i could push you from the top row of 306 but im guessing youre too poor to afford seats. -
<puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a.
This fucker is Kent Griswald, right?
-
Pumpy still loves DoogmanTommySQC said:
<puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a.
This fucker is Kent Griswald, right? -
Kim literally made a living hedging his bet. And Doogs ate that shit up.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Pumpy still loves DoogmanTommySQC said:
<puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a.
This fucker is Kent Griswald, right? -
Didn't he say Notre Dame would make the playoff last year too?
-
Back from Doogman so soon?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
It's like ye never left. -
Puppy- You owe me $20. Mora didn't get fired on Tuesday as you predicted in the first half of UCLA A&M game. "Moose, Rocko help Puppy find his checkbook!"
-
No way in hell this team loses four or even three conference games. TYFYS re the SuckEC but c'mon...I'm your biggest apologist here but this team would have to fall apart go 5-4 again.
-
Takes a wagon jumper to know one
-
Your continued downward spiral into your split-personality disorder is a joy for all of us to witness.
-
-
Could replace Interesting Things with More Booze for our Coug friendsDardanus said:
-
Puppy got skills. I love how he bet against himself with one alt, totally contradicts himself with another alt, then upvotes an alt poast with yet another alt.
-
-
BAZE CONTINUe
-
I would bump a few more Pup threads, but he has gotten WTF'ed, flagged, & downvoted to death.TierbsHsotBoobs said:BAZE CONTINUe
-
agree:PurpleBaze said:
I would bump a few more Pup threads, but he has gotten WTF'ed, flagged, & downvoted to death.TierbsHsotBoobs said:BAZE CONTINUe
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/42355/i-hate-you-fuckers -
Bump, mainly for this gempuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
-
You got one.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Stanford, Cal, Oregon, ASU.haie said:
Oregon, Oregon State (State pride LOL) Arizona, ASU.oregonblitzkrieg said:I fully support your 4 loss thesis, but I don't agree with the teams you selected to derail the Huskie's season.
Sark is not stumbling through that door.
Good for you. -
they still have as good a chance asanyone in thesouth.whatshouldicareabout said:Bump, mainly for this gem
puppylove_sugarsteel said:Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
-
This is quite honestly the worst prediction thread in the history of predictions.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
Finally, some football talk.
-
Bumppuppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
do yourself a favor and work on cleaning up your language and personal attacks it makes you look so smallpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
So Pup predicted 2 losses this year back in the summer. Hmmmm, guess he is good at everything. Of course all yous went on the defense and went off. Pretty sure all yous thought 12-0. Pup said, CLEARLY, and on 2 websites 10-2. Damn pup good at everything.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
And for the doubters, i modified losses to ASU and Stanford on 2 websites during season. Any of yous do that? Not 1 LOL.
Next year feel free to pm me for betting advice. Ill vet to as many as i can, for a fee of course. -
Lying cunt.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
So Pup predicted 2 losses this year back in the summer. Hmmmm, guess he is good at everything. Of course all yous went on the defense and went off. Pretty sure all yous thought 12-0. Pup said, CLEARLY, and on 2 websites 10-2. Damn pup good at everything.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
And for the doubters, i modified losses to ASU and Stanford on 2 websites during season. Any of yous do that? Not 1 LOL.
Next year feel free to pm me for betting advice. Ill vet to as many as i can, for a fee of course.
Go back to Doogman already.
