Things doogs would say
In 1990 we barely beat Purdue and San Jose before welcoming USC to the all I saw was purple game
Trotted out after every bad opener
Thing is this century winning any road game is special for our DAWGS because we sucked until last year. And struggled at Arizona and Utah
The best thing about last night is that Rutgers did all the little things losers do and we slept walked to a win.
Our DAWGS looked like they knew they would win regardless of how shitty they played.
Now get better and find a fucking quarterback
Pettis is the MVP last night. Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
Comments
-
Race i will defer to your judgement, caz you been watching the dawgs longer than most of us have been alive. but fuck the way the OL played was fucking scary
-
Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.
-
Everyone's favorite Husky squad between 1991 and 2016 could barely win regardless of whom they played unless it was Oregon. But they just kept winning.
-
The OL played just like this last year against Rutgers... you don't need Race's experience and perspective to remember that.
-
does that mean we going to get rapped by USC again?Mad_Son said:The OL played just like this last year against Rutgers... you don't need Race's experience and perspective to remember that.
-
If babushka remains our play caller then probably.WeakarmCobra said:
does that mean we going to get rapped by USC again?Mad_Son said:The OL played just like this last year against Rutgers... you don't need Race's experience and perspective to remember that.
I assume you don't actually understand what the difference between early season and late season is? We have the preseason for a reason... -
dont get me wrong, i was just expecting more from the OL given that they all got bigger and stronger. it seemed some of them had not idea what to do during the some parts of the gameMad_Son said:
If babushka remains our play caller then probably.WeakarmCobra said:
does that mean we going to get rapped by USC again?Mad_Son said:The OL played just like this last year against Rutgers... you don't need Race's experience and perspective to remember that.
I assume you don't actually understand what the difference between early season and late season is? We have the preseason for a reason... -
We seriously need a "perspective coffee break with race bannon segment" during your carpet cleaning breaks. Actually, maybe we should call it "it sucks to be old, white, and poor" with RaceBannon
-
Whoosh
"Things doogs would say"
Hook, line and sinker.
Well done Race Bannon. Well done. -
I felt like gaskin was the one who got us unfucked in the 3rd quarter, he was on a different level
-
I don't know, is Lil' Wayne still on the team?WeakarmCobra said:
does that mean we going to get rapped by USC again?Mad_Son said:The OL played just like this last year against Rutgers... you don't need Race's experience and perspective to remember that.
-
COLD BLOODED!!RaceBannon said:An old favorite was
In 1990 we barely beat Purdue and San Jose before welcoming USC to the all I saw was purple game
Trotted out after every bad opener
Thing is this century winning any road game is special for our DAWGS because we sucked until last year. And struggled at Arizona and Utah
The best thing about last night is that Rutgers did all the little things losers do and we slept walked to a win.
Our DAWGS looked like they knew they would win regardless of how shitty they played.
Now get better and find a fucking quarterback
Pettis is the MVP last night. Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened -
news flash: Race ain't po no moCuntWaffle said:We seriously need a "perspective coffee break with race bannon segment" during your carpet cleaning breaks. Actually, maybe we should call it "it sucks to be old, white, and poor" with RaceBannon
-
Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?Doogles said:Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.
-
I'm actually worried about this.Doogles said:Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.
-
People forget that SC gave up 31 points and 263 yards rushing to a shitty western Michigan. People forget that.
-
it does not fit the national narrative that USC is amazing.AEB said:People forget that SC gave up 31 points and 263 yards rushing to a shitty western Michigan. People forget that.
-
RaceBannon said:
An old favorite was
In 1990 we barely beat Purdue and San Jose before welcoming USC to the all I saw was purple game
Trotted out after every bad opener
Thing is this century winning any road game is special for our DAWGS because we sucked until last year. And struggled at Arizona and Utah
The best thing about last night is that Rutgers did all the little things losers do and we slept walked to a win.
Our DAWGS looked like they knew they would win regardless of how shitty they played.
Now get better and find a fucking quarterback
Pettis is the MVP last night. Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
Link?DerekJohnson said:
news flash: Race ain't po no moCuntWaffle said:We seriously need a "perspective coffee break with race bannon segment" during your carpet cleaning breaks. Actually, maybe we should call it "it sucks to be old, white, and poor" with RaceBannon
-
Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
^ doog who is ACTUALLY scared of the revenge factor.
-
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
-
That is the real definition of a doog.Pitchfork51 said:
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.RaceBannon said:Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
Gus Johnson has called the two greatest UCLA comebacks of my lifetime.H_D said:
You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.RaceBannon said:Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Gus Johnson has called the two greatest UCLA comebacks of my miserable and pathetic lifetime.H_D said:
You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.RaceBannon said:Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:haie said:
That is the real definition of a doog.Pitchfork51 said:
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:haie said:
That is the real definition of a doog.Pitchfork51 said:
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie
