Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Things doogs would say

2»

Comments

  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,765 Swaye's Wigwam
    ^ doog who is ACTUALLY scared of the revenge factor.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,883

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,765 Swaye's Wigwam

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    That is the real definition of a doog.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    edited September 2017

    Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened

    You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    H_D said:

    Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened

    You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.
    Gus Johnson has called the two greatest UCLA comebacks of my lifetime.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    haie said:

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    That is the real definition of a doog.
    The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:

    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,765 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    Doogs also say this:


    Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.

    "Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...

    Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.

    Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.

    WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
    I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.

    On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.

    Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.

    God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."
    That is the real definition of a doog.
    The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:

    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie
    image
  • longduckdonglongduckdong Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,025 Swaye's Wigwam
    Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,942 Standard Supporter
    Thanks Great Uncle Race. It's always special to hear from Gil Dobie's spiritual advisor.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
    You wouldn't want to Cozetto when he's angry.
    *see
  • GrandpaSankeyGrandpaSankey Member Posts: 956

    Passion said:

    Doogles said:

    Maybe we should have kept the good OL coach that couldn't recruit because his lines didn't suck.

    Alternatively, how about a man that can recruit and coach? Is there a Jimmy like that coaches OLs?
    His name was Cozetto and he was one tough SOB.
    You wouldn't want to Cozetto when he's angry.
    This guy gets it
Sign In or Register to comment.