Things doogs would say
Comments
-
Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
^ doog who is ACTUALLY scared of the revenge factor.
-
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
-
That is the real definition of a doog.Pitchfork51 said:
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours. -
You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.RaceBannon said:Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
Gus Johnson has called the two greatest UCLA comebacks of my lifetime.H_D said:
You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.RaceBannon said:Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Gus Johnson has called the two greatest UCLA comebacks of my miserable and pathetic lifetime.H_D said:
You are only pointing out the times Gus Johnson was right.RaceBannon said:Gus Johnson called the punt return before it happened
-
The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:haie said:
That is the real definition of a doog.Pitchfork51 said:
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
The real definition of a doog is much simpler than that:haie said:
That is the real definition of a doog.Pitchfork51 said:
God its always "there's a strong possiblity of a loss but I'm not saying it's a loss. I mean well probably lose but we might not. Either way I'll be right."TierbsHsotBoobs said:Doogs also say this:
Colorado not a good matchup for UW early in year. Of course yous all, those who have attacked Pup and Pete for 3-4 years, suddenly attack Pup in Pete's defense? Cant make this shit up.
"Colorado sucks" , "Colorado lost too many guys", "Colorado is starting a 'new' QB" etc... pull your head out your crappers. Appears my wisdom reared its head yet again. UW could very well limp home with a pup-predicted loss from way back. Washington is still a very good team. But if you think theyre going to waltz through this league without a real challenge from at least 5-6 top 25 teams youre retarded...
Pup called Stanford a loss long ago which you homers are well aware of... after Friday I just upgraded Colorado from my pre-season potential -loss to a realistic loss, not a given, but a last-second-field goal type game. I was the only, as usual. Montez is going to have fun with our corners.
Need I mention UCLA? The team I said could very well beat UW at home months ago. If you dorks actually put down the gaming system and watched yesterday, you'd understand what i was getting at 6 months ago regarding UCLA (My DARKHORSE pac12 champ here) This is a very good league.
WSU could very well be a big loss with everything on the line too. Thats a really good football team.
I think theyll be top 10 at some point this year. They are really experienced. Very good in trenches. If they beat Stanford at home lookout.
On a side note, Pup has been clear for the last 2 years about Petersen's negligent recruiting at NG and DT. I've been clear for 2 years that UW will go 8-4, 7-5, maybe 6-6 in '18 due to that. Save it. We are in huge trouble with our front 7 if Ganes follows Vea.
Ill be signing teets this Friday at the Ram in a sort of Pep Rally. Come on by guys, ill sign yours.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/profile/haie
