Reverse mortgages: scourge of millenials
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-08/baby-boomers-who-won-t-sell-are-dominating-the-housing-market
Comments
-
Related: the boomers need to die off
-
Clearly then the government must step in to force these old folks to sell and move into their kids basement. The free market isn't working.
-
I don't what the deal is with house prices these days...all I know is that my parents bought a a decent house for a family of 4 in the late 1980s in eastern Washington for like $55,000, and then sold it in 2005 for like $200,000. And they didn't add-on to it or restore it or anything fancy like that , and it wasn't in some tourist hot spot either. That was just how much the general price of houses went up in 20 years.
So that's almost quadruple the price. Now, I don't know if this is the right way to do the math, but wages certainly haven't quadrupled in that time frame, either. And it's more costly to get a job these days, too. My dad bought that house on a truck driver salary...a job he got with no experience, no schooling, and no special license. He got it by simply walking into a place that said "hiring truck drivers", going on a drive with an experienced driver, and having that driver tell his boss "yeah, he did good, you should hire him", and the boss saying "okay, be here tomorrow at 7". And it wasn't no high-stress trucking job, either. They were short runs in-state, he was home by 6pm every night, and he had weekends off. With that job, he was able to buy a decent house and raise 2 kids while m y mom stayed home and raised us, cooked for us, cleaned, etc.
I'm not saying baby boomers had it easier overall, but in some ways they did. -
I should side with my generation (Gen X represent!) but I'm a homeowner so I'm going with the Republican mantra ("fuck you, I got mine") on this one
-
You stooped motherfucker, it's the Government that killed the free market.2001400ex said:Clearly then the government must step in to force these old folks to sell and move into their kids basement. The free market isn't working.
-
I've never heavily researched reverse mortgages, but just the way they are described by some old celeb shill like Pat Boone makes them sound really shady.
-
Interest rates were in the double digits in the 80's and lenders were more stringent than when they sold the house in 2005. They literally wrote stated income loans that allowed for no income verification.... At all and it only cost you half a point to do so in 2005. So in reality your income only needed to increase 50% as you could buy that house at 4.5% in 2005 with $0 down as opposed to the 15-19% that your parents had on their loan.Fenderbender123 said:I don't what the deal is with house prices these days...all I know is that my parents bought a a decent house for a family of 4 in the late 1980s in eastern Washington for like $55,000, and then sold it in 2005 for like $200,000. And they didn't add-on to it or restore it or anything fancy like that , and it wasn't in some tourist hot spot either. That was just how much the general price of houses went up in 20 years.
So that's almost quadruple the price. Now, I don't know if this is the right way to do the math, but wages certainly haven't quadrupled in that time frame, either. And it's more costly to get a job these days, too. My dad bought that house on a truck driver salary...a job he got with no experience, no schooling, and no special license. He got it by simply walking into a place that said "hiring truck drivers", going on a drive with an experienced driver, and having that driver tell his boss "yeah, he did good, you should hire him", and the boss saying "okay, be here tomorrow at 7". And it wasn't no high-stress trucking job, either. They were short runs in-state, he was home by 6pm every night, and he had weekends off. With that job, he was able to buy a decent house and raise 2 kids while m y mom stayed home and raised us, cooked for us, cleaned, etc.
I'm not saying baby boomers had it easier overall, but in some ways they did. -
But But the late Fred Thompson and Tom Selleck also endorse them. They're great for the homeowner but a pain in the ass for the person who inherits the home, especiallyif they aren't gainfully employed and have good credit. Say.... like a standard HH poaster.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I've never heavily researched reverse mortgages, but just the way they are described by some old celeb shill like Pat Boone makes them sound really shady.
-
I will ask real estate expert Kent Griswold his thoughts.
-
We have good credit?salemcoog said:
But But the late Fred Thompson and Tom Selleck also endorse them. They're great for the homeowner but a pain in the ass for the person who inherits the home, especiallyif they aren't gainfully employed and have good credit. Say.... like a standard HH poaster.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I've never heavily researched reverse mortgages, but just the way they are described by some old celeb shill like Pat Boone makes them sound really shady.





