I am so pissed off I can barely stand it right now
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE YEAR. 4 STRAIGHT TOP 25 RECRUITING CLASSES (only 13 other schools can say that) TWO DEEPS FULL OF JRS AND SRS. A 5TH YEAR QB AND TONS OF PLAYMAKERS, AND VERY FEW INJURIES!!!!
But no. Kiffin's little brother can't teach kids how to execute within the rules. He can't teach them to cover kick offs. He can't commit to the run. And he can't get them to consistently play hard.
With the talent coming back, a good coach could instantly turn this team into a contender next year. But Sark will just keep us stuck on mediocre. HE MUST GO NOW!! TODAY!!
GO BEAVS!! GO COUGS!! END OUR MISERY. ITS 2008 AGAIN!!
Sorry. You guys know all this. I just had to vent somewhere, and my wife is sick of listening to me.
Comments
-
-
You have a wife?
-
I'm in. Email sent to AD this morning.
-
You're gonna be held to these words just in case you get battered woman syndrome again if Sark does luck out and win in Corvallis.Auburndawg said:It is really sinking in how much this program sucks right now.
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE YEAR. 4 STRAIGHT TOP 25 RECRUITING CLASSES (only 13 other schools can say that) TWO DEEPS FULL OF JRS AND SRS. A 5TH YEAR QB AND TONS OF PLAYMAKERS, AND VERY FEW INJURIES!!!!
But no. Kiffin's little brother can't teach kids how to execute within the rules. He can't teach them to cover kick offs. He can't commit to the run. And he can't get them to consistently play hard.
With the talent coming back, a good coach could instantly turn this team into a contender next year. But Sark will just keep us stuck on mediocre. HE MUST GO NOW!! TODAY!!
GO BEAVS!! GO COUGS!! END OUR MISERY. ITS 2008 AGAIN!!
Sorry. You guys know all this. I just had to vent somewhere, and my wife is sick of listening to me. -
Correction. Its 2007 and not 2008 because Sark will be retained because our AD, fans and boosters are a bunch of manginas with no standards and goals.
-
"You're gonna be held to these words just in case you get battered woman syndrome again if Sark does luck out and win in Corvallis."
I will say it again:
The only way I would ever change my mind on Sark now is if he wins 12+ games next year. Even then I would go from nega back to skeptical. -
"You're gonna be held to these words just in case you get battered woman syndrome again if Sark does luck out and win in Corvallis."Auburndawg said:
I will say it again:
The only way I would ever change my mind on Sark now is if he wins 12+ games next year. Even then I would go from nega back to skeptical.
Who fucking cares if Sark wins 12 next year. If Sankey comes back he should win 12 with that roster & schedule. He's not a championship coach. Mike Price and Dick Tomey coached for a while and had a few great teams but both were 500 coaches. If Sark is here for 12 years I'm sure he'd have 1 or 2 top 10 teams. He is what he is. Average at best. Sooner he's gone the better off we'll be. -
I DONT WANT HIM HERE AT ALL NEXT YEAR OR NEXT WEEK!!
KIFFINATE HIM NOW. -
Fixed.Auburndawg said:It is really sinking in how much this program sucks right now.
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE YEAR. 4 STRAIGHT TOP 25 RECRUITING CLASSES (only 13 other schools can say that) TWO DEEPS FULL OF JRS AND SRS. A 5TH YEAR QB AND TONS OF PLAYMAKERS, AND VERY FEW INJURIES!!!!
But no. Kiffin's little brother can't teach kids how to execute within the rules. He can't teach them to cover kick offs. He can't commit to the run. And he can't get them to consistently play hard.
With the talent coming back, a good coach could instantly turn this team into a contender next year. But Sark will just keep us stuck on mediocre. HE MUST GO NOW!! TODAY!!
GO BEAVS!! GO COUGS!! END OUR MISERY. ITS 2006 AGAIN!!
Sorry. You guys know all this. I just had to vent somewhere, and my wife is sick of listening to me.
-
-
I wasn't rooting for us to actually lose in 2006.
-
You should have been. Ty should have been fired after the suddenly senior game.Auburndawg said:I wasn't rooting for us to actually lose in 2006.
-
The AD will just delete it and that'll fall on deaf ears.Auburndawg said:I'm in. Email sent to AD this morning.
I did get a reply when I emailed Young: president@uw.edu, although the response from UW Media Relations was fucking laughable.
-
Post the form letter or get the fuck out.Joe Stephanson said:
The AD will just delete it and that'll fall on deaf ears.Auburndawg said:I'm in. Email sent to AD this morning.
I did get a reply when I emailed Young: president@uw.edu, although the response from UW Media Relations was fucking laughable. -
I think I sent Emmert a couple of emails in 2007. His underlings responded once in a form letter way IIRC. These guys don't give a fuck unless you're a big time booster or a donor.
-
Post the form letter or get the fuck out.
I thought you'd never ask:
Date: Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: FW: Extremely Concerned UW Alum
To: "digits@uw.edu"
Cc: "pres@uw.edu"
Dear Mr. Stephanson:
President Young has asked me to reply on his behalf to your email message about the football program. Your analysis is impressive, as are your passion and commitment to Husky football. Indeed, it is largely due to the kind of interest you have that the program has been so important to our community for so many years, long before the James era, during his heyday, and even through the down years of the previous decade or so. I think we all know it takes time to build a long-term consistent winner, especially in today’s more competitive college football environment. And we understand that patience can be short. Some, like yourself, believe if we haven’t done it in 4-5 years under a coach, it’s time for a change. Others believe it can take longer, especially given how far back from the bottom this program had to come. As I’m sure you understand, there are many factors that go into evaluating the success of a program. Wins and losses are unquestionably important, and so is the culture in the program, the type of students who represent the University and their success in accomplishing their educational objectives. We take all of this into consideration when we evaluate our success.
I can also assure you that no one wants to win more than our athletic director and our head coach and coaching staff. We believe they are bright, capable, driven people who can restore the program to its former glory. I know you may disagree with this, and perhaps all I can say is, stay with us. There is more success to come.
Thank you for writing and expressing your passion for the program. We need it.
-
Post the form letter or get the fuck out.Joe Stephanson said:
I thought you'd never ask:
Date: Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: FW: Extremely Concerned UW Alum
To: "digits@uw.edu"
Cc: "pres@uw.edu"
Dear Mr. Stephanson:
President Young has asked me to reply on his behalf to your email message about the football program. Your analysis is impressive, as are your passion and commitment to Husky football. Indeed, it is largely due to the kind of interest you have that the program has been so important to our community for so many years, long before the James era, during his heyday, and even through the down years of the previous decade or so. I think we all know it takes time to build a long-term consistent winner, especially in today’s more competitive college football environment. And we understand that patience can be short. Some, like yourself, believe if we haven’t done it in 4-5 years under a coach, it’s time for a change. Others believe it can take longer, especially given how far back from the bottom this program had to come. As I’m sure you understand, there are many factors that go into evaluating the success of a program. Wins and losses are unquestionably important, and so is the culture in the program, the type of students who represent the University and their success in accomplishing their educational objectives. We take all of this into consideration when we evaluate our success.
I can also assure you that no one wants to win more than our athletic director and our head coach and coaching staff. We believe they are bright, capable, driven people who can restore the program to its former glory. I know you may disagree with this, and perhaps all I can say is, stay with us. There is more success to come.
Thank you for writing and expressing your passion for the program. We need it.
Did you reply back pointing out how Stanford came back faster? -
Post the form letter or get the fuck out.Joe Stephanson said:
I thought you'd never ask:
Date: Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: FW: Extremely Concerned UW Alum
To: "digits@uw.edu"
Cc: "pres@uw.edu"
Dear Mr. Stephanson:
President Young has asked me to reply on his behalf to your email message about the football program. Your analysis is impressive, as are your passion and commitment to Husky football. Indeed, it is largely due to the kind of interest you have that the program has been so important to our community for so many years, long before the James era, during his heyday, and even through the down years of the previous decade or so. I think we all know it takes time to build a long-term consistent winner, especially in today’s more competitive college football environment. And we understand that patience can be short. Some, like yourself, believe if we haven’t done it in 4-5 years under a coach, it’s time for a change. Others believe it can take longer, especially given how far back from the bottom this program had to come. As I’m sure you understand, there are many factors that go into evaluating the success of a program. Wins and losses are unquestionably important, and so is the culture in the program, the type of students who represent the University and their success in accomplishing their educational objectives. We take all of this into consideration when we evaluate our success.
I can also assure you that no one wants to win more than our athletic director and our head coach and coaching staff. We believe they are bright, capable, driven people who can restore the program to its former glory. I know you may disagree with this, and perhaps all I can say is, stay with us. There is more success to come.
Thank you for writing and expressing your passion for the program. We need it.
I call Bullshit.
-
The only good thing about that letter was it came after the Oregon game when fewer people had jumped ship. At least they're listening...hopefully.
-
Did you reply back pointing out how Stanford came back faster?
Nope. Considering the reply, I figured it's a waste of my time. I'm currently resigned to the fact that we're fuct, and the only way I can get it through to the UW Admin is by not spending a dime on anything UW football. It seems to be the only way to force them into making a change.
-
Post the form letter or get the fuck out.Joe Stephanson said:
I thought you'd never ask:
Date: Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: FW: Extremely Concerned UW Alum
To: "digits@uw.edu"
Cc: "pres@uw.edu"
Dear Mr. Stephanson:
President Young has asked me to reply on his behalf to your email message about the football program. Your analysis is impressive, as are your passion and commitment to Husky football. Indeed, it is largely due to the kind of interest you have that the program has been so important to our community for so many years, long before the James era, during his heyday, and even through the down years of the previous decade or so. I think we all know it takes time to build a long-term consistent winner, especially in today’s more competitive college football environment. And we understand that patience can be short. Some, like yourself, believe if we haven’t done it in 4-5 years under a coach, it’s time for a change. Others believe it can take longer, especially given how far back from the bottom this program had to come. As I’m sure you understand, there are many factors that go into evaluating the success of a program. Wins and losses are unquestionably important, and so is the culture in the program, the type of students who represent the University and their success in accomplishing their educational objectives. We take all of this into consideration when we evaluate our success.
I can also assure you that no one wants to win more than our athletic director and our head coach and coaching staff. We believe they are bright, capable, driven people who can restore the program to its former glory. I know you may disagree with this, and perhaps all I can say is, stay with us. There is more success to come.
Thank you for writing and expressing your passion for the program. We need it.
Well...if you needed proof that UW football was dead, here ya go. -
Auburndawg said:
It is really sinking in how much this program sucks right now.
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE YEAR. 4 STRAIGHT TOP 25 RECRUITING CLASSES (only 13 other schools can say that) TWO DEEPS FULL OF JRS AND SRS. A 5TH YEAR QB AND TONS OF PLAYMAKERS, AND VERY FEW INJURIES!!!!
But no. Kiffin's little brother can't teach kids how to execute within the rules. He can't teach them to cover kick offs. He can't commit to the run. And he can't get them to consistently play hard.
With the talent coming back, a good coach could instantly turn this team into a contender next year. But Sark will just keep us stuck on mediocre. HE MUST GO NOW!! TODAY!!
GO BEAVS!! GO COUGS!! END OUR MISERY. ITS 2008 AGAIN!!
Sorry. You guys know all this. I just had to vent somewhere, and my wife is sick of listening to me.
Does anyone else get the mental picture of "Hot & Cold" by Huey Lewis playing in the background as he dances around in a skin suit while they read this?
-
If it makes you feel any better or more football astute, it should be obvious that it's no consulation for some of us to have lived (and suffered) for years with the reality you have just acquired. If you think your frustration with the state of Husky Football is over the edge now, wait a couple of years while SarkBall improves by one or two more wins at best,...... providing a couple more cupcakes can be found on the schedule. If Sark is still our coach at the end of 2015, we should expect no better if as good in conference as where the Huskies are now in the middle of the Pac-12 poised to slip as OSU, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, CAL, and WSU get better (if they can). And if Sark and Woody go looking for more OOC cupcakes and donut-holes to pad the win column, let us pray they find a way to get the road trip to Boise State off the 2015 schedule. That would be the Oregon Way. to selling more tickets and luxury suites to doogs,.... just as UO did years ago in filling-up Autzen Arena with toothless grenolas and trailer trash.Auburndawg said:It is really sinking in how much this program sucks right now.
THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE YEAR. 4 STRAIGHT TOP 25 RECRUITING CLASSES (only 13 other schools can say that) TWO DEEPS FULL OF JRS AND SRS. A 5TH YEAR QB AND TONS OF PLAYMAKERS, AND VERY FEW INJURIES!!!!
But no. Kiffin's little brother can't teach kids how to execute within the rules. He can't teach them to cover kick offs. He can't commit to the run. And he can't get them to consistently play hard.
With the talent coming back, a good coach could instantly turn this team into a contender next year. But Sark will just keep us stuck on mediocre. HE MUST GO NOW!! TODAY!!
GO BEAVS!! GO COUGS!! END OUR MISERY. ITS 2008 AGAIN!!
Sorry. You guys know all this. I just had to vent somewhere, and my wife is sick of listening to me. -
If 7WS is still our HC at the end of 2015, then we're officially the Iowa of the Pac-12. Wait, we already are.
-
The beavs and cougs aren't going to do you any favors, they play swill football.
-
So does UW.oregonblitzkrieg said:The beavs and cougs aren't going to do you any favors, they play swill football.
Hope this helps.
-
Auburn you are part of the problem. Fans like you who constantly make excuses for Sark. Shit two days ago you said you were done with him then only 12 hours later you are explaining how you could support Sark again.
-
Elite swill > average swill and will win the day. Not what you all want. Sark knows he has a running back. Someone needs to tell Leach it's ok to run the ball more than 5 times per game.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So does UW.oregonblitzkrieg said:The beavs and cougs aren't going to do you any favors, they play swill football.
-
Fucking Christ?
Did Todd Turner write that bullshit?
Wins and losses are unquestionably important, and so is the culture in the program, the type of students who represent the University and their success in accomplishing their educational objectives.
You are what your record says you are.
Washington's culture is now one of accepting mediocre performance ...
7-6 is the new 10-1
FYI to President Young ...
Washington was never 0-12 ... that was a team who quit on their coach, because your predecessor quit on them.
I learned that in Bow Down To Willingham ... Kindle version is available for purchase. -
Money grab.topdawgnc said:Fucking Christ?
Did Todd Turner write that bullshit?
Wins and losses are unquestionably important, and so is the culture in the program, the type of students who represent the University and their success in accomplishing their educational objectives.
You are what your record says you are.
Washington's culture is now one of accepting mediocre performance ...
7-6 is the new 10-1
FYI to President Young ...
Washington was never 0-12 ... that was a team who quit on their coach, because your predecessor quit on them.
I learned that in Bow Down To Willingham ... Kindle version is available for purchase.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
