"the dems need to stop obsessing over Trannies"
Comments
-
And yet you continue to shit post and start shit threads about things that effect .3% of the population. Beside If you fags can't see the common sense of those with a dick should piss in the boys bathroom and those without should not, you should try the new Fiery avalanche ride at 6 Fags Park.dhdawg said:This is what I keep beimg told after a Republican legislature and governor goes out of their way to pass a law against them using the wrong bathroom.
And now the president going out of his way to try and ban them from serving in the military.
Seriously? Why do the Democrats care so much about .3% of the population?
-
I'm afraid it was done quite awhile ago.RaceBannon said: -
It's nice that some of you really pretend that you cair.
-
If I didn't have the ability to use the awesomeness of a urinal I would never go in the men's bathroom.salemcoog said:
And yet you continue to shit post and start shit threads about things that effect .3% of the population. Beside If you fags can't see the common sense of those with a dick should piss in the boys bathroom and those without should not, you should try the new Fiery avalanche ride at 6 Fags Park.dhdawg said:This is what I keep beimg told after a Republican legislature and governor goes out of their way to pass a law against them using the wrong bathroom.
And now the president going out of his way to try and ban them from serving in the military.
Seriously? Why do the Democrats care so much about .3% of the population?
-
Dude61 said:
Trumps decision was based on advise from those that run the military. The armed forces are currently forced to pay for gender reassignment surgery. Why should the military pay to make trans-gendered people? Trans people are another prop used in an endless political fight.AZDuck said:
Please to be explaining how trannies in the military have an effect on military readiness. Also, the President cited medical costs in his official tweet.doogie said:It''s a military readiness and effectiveness issue.
Simple.
Is it one or the other, or both?
In the end, the decision was about practicality, not bigotry. As Race mentions, the trannies will survive not being required to kill at close quarters.
In a sign of the confusion caused by the move, Pentagon officials initially declined to speak about the policy shift. Spokesman Capt. Jeff Davis eventually released a statement admitting the Defense Department has no plan to deal with the policy reversal, and “will provide revised guidance to the Department in the near future.”
http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/07/26/trump-blindsides-pentagon-in-transgender-policy-shift/
Trump’s tweets did not say what would happen to transgender troops currently in the ranks. But he said that after consulting with “my Generals and military experts,” the government “will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.”
The Pentagon referred all questions to the White House.
Under still-current policy, soldiers seeking gender transition must get approval of their brigade commander, who is required to consider a trio of factors in making the decision whether or not to approve the request:
- facts and circumstances of the soldier and his/her request
- military readiness
- good order and discipline
https://www.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/453704.pdf
The RAND Corporation estimated that between 1,320 and 6,630 active-duty personnel are transgender. The report estimated that between 29 and 129 troops might seek medical treatment, including hormones or surgery, a year, for their condition. To date, five servicemembers have started some kind of medical treatment for gender dysphoria, including one person who is seeking to have gender-reassignment surgery.
http://www.militarytimes.com/2016/09/19/pentagon-to-cover-sex-reassignment-surgery-for-transgender-active-duty-troops/ -
Koopdog's silence is deafening
-
How is that "alienating" voters.RaceBannon said:Trump continues to call the tune and the democrats dance. They forgot already that they are reaching out to middle America with a "new plan" and are back in the Obama playbook alienating voters for less than 1% of the population
I applaud Trump for keeping our Trannies safe and at home out of harms way.
The north Carolina governor lost reelection because of his obsession over this issue.
And trump really has done a great job reaching out to "middle America" whatever the fuck that means.
-
Pretty sure you'll find the answer you seek from the military commanders who felt this way enough to influence policy this direction.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How?doogie said:It''s a military readiness and effectiveness issue.
Simple. -
Uh actually this is false. I live in San Francisco and the hot trend at bars and restaurants has been to make every bathroom genderless. Which may not sound great but really as a guy it just gives you more bathrooms to pee in. It fucks over girls who now have to deal with every bathroom having piss all over it which is pretty funny. It's fucking sweet.salemcoog said:
And yet you continue to shit post and start shit threads about things that effect .3% of the population. Beside If you fags can't see the common sense of those with a dick should piss in the boys bathroom and those without should not, you should try the new Fiery avalanche ride at 6 Fags Park.dhdawg said:This is what I keep beimg told after a Republican legislature and governor goes out of their way to pass a law against them using the wrong bathroom.
And now the president going out of his way to try and ban them from serving in the military.
Seriously? Why do the Democrats care so much about .3% of the population? -
Go on...cite them.doogie said:
Pretty sure you'll find the answer you seek from the military commanders who felt this way enough to influence policy this direction.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
How?doogie said:It''s a military readiness and effectiveness issue.
Simple.
