Will our Defense be good enough in 2017 to make it to the Natty Game?


Will our Defense be good enough in 2017 to make it to the Natty Game? 37 votes
Comments
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyoneDefense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
If we have a decent right and left guard we can compete for a nationalYellowSnow said:
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
-
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?The loss of Littleton and Feeney will be too difficult to overcome
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyoneVea is an All-American and Gaines literally eats people. Yes.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
We had decent guards last year.WeakarmCobra said:
If we have a decent right and left guard we can compete for a nationalYellowSnow said:
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
They have to be better than decent. -
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
NTD, BBSwaye said:Vea is an All-American and Gaines literally eats people. Yes.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
fapYellowSnow said: -
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?
They can't pitch a shutout in the playoffs.YellowSnow said: -
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Truth, but this wasn't a "will the defense be good enuff to cover for the offense pole", rather, will we have a NT caliber defense in 2017?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
They can't pitch a shutout in the playoffs.YellowSnow said: -
Yes. But the Question is will it be good enough to beat USC and Darnold ? Tall order
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
I think they are. But remains to be seen whether we can put points on the board against an elite defense. Didn't happen in 2016- i.e., 13 against SC and 7 against Bammer.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Yes. But the Question is will it be good enough to beat USC and Darnold ? Tall order
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Right guard was work in process. Jake E was on that level. The whole game plan was to go at lil nickdnc said:
We had decent guards last year.WeakarmCobra said:
If we have a decent right and left guard we can compete for a nationalYellowSnow said:
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
They have to be better than decent.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyoneOffense will struggle.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Harris couldn't hold up against the best front 7 in college football. That doesn't mean he wasn't decent.WeakarmCobra said:
Right guard was work in process. Jake E was on that level. The whole game plan was to go at lil nickdnc said:
We had decent guards last year.WeakarmCobra said:
If we have a decent right and left guard we can compete for a nationalYellowSnow said:
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
They have to be better than decent.
If you're saying we need guards who are decent against the best in the nation then you are saying we need guards who are more than decent. -
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone@dnc
What team did you watch to say that uw had decent guards? UW had 1 decent guard -
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
I forgot... Faggart (tee hee) is going to get Whoregon (hardy har har) to the Natty this year.oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
NTD, BB round #2oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?
Here is what round #2 vs whatever other team happens to be there if you make it, looks like. That's a very big, unlikely IF BTW.YellowSnow said:
NTD, BB round #2oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Agree, we don't have a NT caliber offense still, so sum of the parts isn't there most likely. But the pole was only about defense. Few teams get there w/o being elite on both sides of the ball.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Here is what round #2 vs whatever other team happens to be there if you make it, looks like. That's a very big, unlikely IF BTW.YellowSnow said:
NTD, BB round #2oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?
Only the most retarded quook would actually believe that. HTH. Beat UW. Nothing else matters.PurpleBaze said:
I forgot... Faggart (tee hee) is going to get Whoregon (hardy har har) to the Natty this year.oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?I'm not sure Faggart deserved a tee hee.
Faggart is a funny nickname. -
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?
Your defense is good but you have the same problem Oregon did. Big fast guys > smaller fast guys. Which is why the South/SEC always wins. I agree about the offense. It sucks balls.YellowSnow said:
Agree, we don't have a NT caliber offense still, so sum of the parts isn't there most likely. But the pole was only about defense. Few teams get there w/o being elite on both sides of the ball.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Here is what round #2 vs whatever other team happens to be there if you make it, looks like. That's a very big, unlikely IF BTW.YellowSnow said:
NTD, BB round #2oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
You literally just said USC is in some deep shit if UW plays them like a week ago.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Yes. But the Question is will it be good enough to beat USC and Darnold ? Tall order
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
If they pitch a shutout I will be pitching a tent in the basementTierbsHsotBoobs said:
They can't pitch a shutout in the playoffs.YellowSnow said:
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Of the 8 teams who have made the playoffs and had an opportunity to return (IOW, all playoff teams except 2016 because we don't know who has returned from that pool yet), three made it two years in a row. So the answer to the second part of your statement is 37.5%. And the first part is irrelevant since UW already did it.oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
So chances are UW doesn't make it back this year, but it's far from a lock.
BTW, the odds UW makes it back within the next two years are 50%, and the odds UW makes it back both of the next two years are 25%.
Honk em. -
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?
Upvoted for the use of complicated math equations to make your poontdnc said:
Of the 8 teams who have made the playoffs and had an opportunity to return (IOW, all playoff teams except 2016 because we don't know who has returned from that pool yet), three made it two years in a row. So the answer to the second part of your statement is 37.5%. And the first part is irrelevant since UW already did it.oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
So chances are UW doesn't make it back this year, but it's far from a lock.
BTW, the odds UW makes it back within the next two years are 50%, and the odds UW makes it back both of the next two years are 25%.
Honk em. -
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyoneDoes pup have erotic homosexual fantasies?
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
3/8 is complicated math to you?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Upvoted for the use of complicated math equations to make your poontdnc said:
Of the 8 teams who have made the playoffs and had an opportunity to return (IOW, all playoff teams except 2016 because we don't know who has returned from that pool yet), three made it two years in a row. So the answer to the second part of your statement is 37.5%. And the first part is irrelevant since UW already did it.oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
So chances are UW doesn't make it back this year, but it's far from a lock.
BTW, the odds UW makes it back within the next two years are 50%, and the odds UW makes it back both of the next two years are 25%.
Honk em.
Chinteresting.