Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Will our Defense be good enough in 2017 to make it to the Natty Game?
Comments
-
Yes. But the Question is will it be good enough to beat USC and Darnold ? Tall order
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
I think they are. But remains to be seen whether we can put points on the board against an elite defense. Didn't happen in 2016- i.e., 13 against SC and 7 against Bammer.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Yes. But the Question is will it be good enough to beat USC and Darnold ? Tall order
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Right guard was work in process. Jake E was on that level. The whole game plan was to go at lil nickdnc said:
We had decent guards last year.WeakarmCobra said:
If we have a decent right and left guard we can compete for a nationalYellowSnow said:
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
They have to be better than decent.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyoneOffense will struggle.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
Harris couldn't hold up against the best front 7 in college football. That doesn't mean he wasn't decent.WeakarmCobra said:
Right guard was work in process. Jake E was on that level. The whole game plan was to go at lil nickdnc said:
We had decent guards last year.WeakarmCobra said:
If we have a decent right and left guard we can compete for a nationalYellowSnow said:
Agree. Defense last year was good enough to compete for a NT. Don't see the backfield situation costing us a game before the season starts on 12/1/17. Gut tells me Offense won't be good enough to get us to the finals, however. A Pac 12 freshman offensive player of the year contender could help though as we move out of the midget receiver era.dnc said:Defense, yes. Offense, almost. Overall, not quite.
They have to be better than decent.
If you're saying we need guards who are decent against the best in the nation then you are saying we need guards who are more than decent. -
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone@dnc
What team did you watch to say that uw had decent guards? UW had 1 decent guard -
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
I forgot... Faggart (tee hee) is going to get Whoregon (hardy har har) to the Natty this year.oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
Yes - By mid season our D will be good enough to keep us in the game with anyone
NTD, BB round #2oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
-
No - How will replace Littleton and Feeney?
Here is what round #2 vs whatever other team happens to be there if you make it, looks like. That's a very big, unlikely IF BTW.YellowSnow said:
NTD, BB round #2oregonblitzkrieg said:Great fucking Kreist. You fuckers are not even getting to the playoffs this year. Do you understand how difficult it is to even get there at all, much less during consecutive years.
