Jalen Hurts - WARNING - stat bullshit
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense
Comments
-
Say what you will about Joey Freshwater, at least he knew what he had in Hurts; an athletic QB who can't read a defense either before or after the snap. Which is why they ran the ball, and only let Hurts make simple half-field reads when they threw it. I wonder if that's all Hurts is ever going to be. Alabama have been slowly shifting away from a lot of the pro-style stuff.
Even in his last season, Deshaun Watson was still predominantly asked to make half-field reads. Which is why he's gonna be a huge bust in the NFL. I hope that's not a trend for college offenses. Some of these spread offenses are boring enough as they are.
Either way I'm glad we're running a legit offense. And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid. -
Sounds just like me at the bar on Friday night.NorwegianHusky said:
And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid. -
I'm currently at a bar on Pacific Beach.Swaye said:
Sounds just like me at the bar on Friday night.NorwegianHusky said:
And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
Gonna attempt to do just that. -
Many of us in the game thread were horrified by Sark's play calling in that game.
-
The exception being when there are unblocked pass rushers headed straight for him, and he proceeds to shit his pantsNorwegianHusky said:Say what you will about Joey Freshwater, at least he knew what he had in Hurts; an athletic QB who can't read a defense either before or after the snap. Which is why they ran the ball, and only let Hurts make simple half-field reads when they threw it. I wonder if that's all Hurts is ever going to be. Alabama have been slowly shifting away from a lot of the pro-style stuff.
Even in his last season, Deshaun Watson was still predominantly asked to make half-field reads. Which is why he's gonna be a huge bust in the NFL. I hope that's not a trend for college offenses. Some of these spread offenses are boring enough as they are.
Either way I'm glad we're running a legit offense. And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid. -
I wouldn't be surprised if Tua Tagovailoa is starting by midseason. Better passer and almost as mobile as Hurts
-
Saban needs to own that shit. He could have just as well called his own plays in the NCG and done a better job than Sarktard.
Saban could have just run the fucking ball every down and dropped 31. Only question would be whether to go right, left or up the middle.
-
So easy to do in PBPitchfork51 said:
I'm currently at a bar on Pacific Beach.Swaye said:
Sounds just like me at the bar on Friday night.NorwegianHusky said:
And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
Gonna attempt to do just that. -
Smoke weed, talk shit, run the ball.
-
Hurts sucks. Watson doesn't suck. Who gives a fuck about progressions. Make plays, and win. It worked 50 years ago. It works now.NorwegianHusky said:Say what you will about Joey Freshwater, at least he knew what he had in Hurts; an athletic QB who can't read a defense either before or after the snap. Which is why they ran the ball, and only let Hurts make simple half-field reads when they threw it. I wonder if that's all Hurts is ever going to be. Alabama have been slowly shifting away from a lot of the pro-style stuff.
Even in his last season, Deshaun Watson was still predominantly asked to make half-field reads. Which is why he's gonna be a huge bust in the NFL. I hope that's not a trend for college offenses. Some of these spread offenses are boring enough as they are.
Either way I'm glad we're running a legit offense. And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
Run the Wing-T if it brings a Natty. -
Jake lost us the Bama game at the end of half. That was the epitome of a Brownsocking moment. We still probably don't win that game but at least we would have been in position to have a shot at it.NorwegianHusky said:Say what you will about Joey Freshwater, at least he knew what he had in Hurts; an athletic QB who can't read a defense either before or after the snap. Which is why they ran the ball, and only let Hurts make simple half-field reads when they threw it. I wonder if that's all Hurts is ever going to be. Alabama have been slowly shifting away from a lot of the pro-style stuff.
Even in his last season, Deshaun Watson was still predominantly asked to make half-field reads. Which is why he's gonna be a huge bust in the NFL. I hope that's not a trend for college offenses. Some of these spread offenses are boring enough as they are.
Either way I'm glad we're running a legit offense. And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
That being said I'm not as anti Jake as most either. He's head over heels better than what we have had recently and I still think he can improve. I love that he is a shit talker on the field. Pretty sure we all doomed hard at "the point" that was fucking awesome.
He is easily the 2nd best QB in the conference. Fuck Herbert and Falk. Herbert has the Jack Lockner new car smell on him and Falk fucking sucks. Of course I would rather have Darnold but Jake has been pretty good.
I am sick and fucking tired of white QBs named Jake though. Could we at least get like a Chad or Austin? -
It was more the coaches faults than Brownings tbh. He still threw the ball so he gets blame but he almost threw a pick 6 right before that. I remember saying outloud "well that's halftime" because WHO THE FUCK WOULD THROW AGAIN. Gotta know your personnel and Brownsocks was ready to throw the game away, you can't let him throw. It was Carroll/Bevell level stupid.CuntWaffle said:
Jake lost us the Bama game at the end of half. That was the epitome of a Brownsocking moment. We still probably don't win that game but at least we would have been in position to have a shot at it.NorwegianHusky said:Say what you will about Joey Freshwater, at least he knew what he had in Hurts; an athletic QB who can't read a defense either before or after the snap. Which is why they ran the ball, and only let Hurts make simple half-field reads when they threw it. I wonder if that's all Hurts is ever going to be. Alabama have been slowly shifting away from a lot of the pro-style stuff.
Even in his last season, Deshaun Watson was still predominantly asked to make half-field reads. Which is why he's gonna be a huge bust in the NFL. I hope that's not a trend for college offenses. Some of these spread offenses are boring enough as they are.
Either way I'm glad we're running a legit offense. And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
That being said I'm not as anti Jake as most either. He's head over heels better than what we have had recently and I still think he can improve. I love that he is a shit talker on the field. Pretty sure we all doomed hard at "the point" that was fucking awesome.
He is easily the 2nd best QB in the conference. Fuck Herbert and Falk. Herbert has the Jack Lockner new car smell on him and Falk fucking sucks. Of course I would rather have Darnold but Jake has been pretty good.
I am sick and fucking tired of white QBs named Jake though. Could we at least get like a Chad or Austin? -
This.allpurpleallgold said:
It was more the coaches faults than Brownings tbh. He still threw the ball so he gets blame but he almost threw a pick 6 right before that. I remember saying outloud "well that's halftime" because WHO THE FUCK WOULD THROW AGAIN. Gotta know your personnel and Brownsocks was ready to throw the game away, you can't let him throw. It was Carroll/Bevell level stupid.CuntWaffle said:
Jake lost us the Bama game at the end of half. That was the epitome of a Brownsocking moment. We still probably don't win that game but at least we would have been in position to have a shot at it.NorwegianHusky said:Say what you will about Joey Freshwater, at least he knew what he had in Hurts; an athletic QB who can't read a defense either before or after the snap. Which is why they ran the ball, and only let Hurts make simple half-field reads when they threw it. I wonder if that's all Hurts is ever going to be. Alabama have been slowly shifting away from a lot of the pro-style stuff.
Even in his last season, Deshaun Watson was still predominantly asked to make half-field reads. Which is why he's gonna be a huge bust in the NFL. I hope that's not a trend for college offenses. Some of these spread offenses are boring enough as they are.
Either way I'm glad we're running a legit offense. And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
That being said I'm not as anti Jake as most either. He's head over heels better than what we have had recently and I still think he can improve. I love that he is a shit talker on the field. Pretty sure we all doomed hard at "the point" that was fucking awesome.
He is easily the 2nd best QB in the conference. Fuck Herbert and Falk. Herbert has the Jack Lockner new car smell on him and Falk fucking sucks. Of course I would rather have Darnold but Jake has been pretty good.
I am sick and fucking tired of white QBs named Jake though. Could we at least get like a Chad or Austin?
Someone throw Smiff off a bridge. -
Which Bar? Lahaina? I'm hoping it's not Pennant or Beachcomber or your* gonna end up with an old broad.Pitchfork51 said:
I'm currently at a bar on Pacific Beach.Swaye said:
Sounds just like me at the bar on Friday night.NorwegianHusky said:
And say what you will about Browning; he usually goes through his progressions properly before he freaks out and does something stupid.
Gonna attempt to do just that.
Swing by MB Tattoo afterwards. always a few young chicks with daddy issues down there checking out the artwork. -
I'm glad I made you THINK and CARE @RaceBannon
-
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense -
puppylove_sugarsteve said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense
-
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense -
Puppy smart at everythingpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense -
I like to wear out my defense with 3 and outs and get credit for my offense winning the game
-
ITWYLTD?RaceBannon said:I like to wear out my defense with 3 and outs and get credit for my offense winning the game
-
WTF are you talking about Bannon? We are talking about the national championship game, college football...between Alabama and Clemson!!!
-
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
WTF are you talking about Bannon? We are talking about the national championship game, college football...between Oregon and Auburn !!!
-
Saban's and idiot for not keeping Dark aboard. Ive watched Sark call 2 of the best rose bowl offenses ive ever seen and a national title game he should have won. He called an awesome game. Leave it to you pussyless wonders to skew the factsCuntWaffle said:
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense
-
No he did not. Sark was actually pounding the ball down Clemson's throat then In retarded Sark fashion he let Jalen go out and RIP IT and he went 13/31... which put the ball in Watson's hand more times because he wasted 0 clock. Sark sucks get off his nuts.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Saban's and idiot for not keeping Dark aboard. Ive watched Sark call 2 of the best rose bowl offenses ive ever seen and a national title game he should have won. He called an awesome game. Leave it to you pussyless wonders to skew the factsCuntWaffle said:
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense -
I recommend you find your meds and let those that lose more knowledge about football when they queef than you have in your brain do the heavy lifting and thinking around here ...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Saban's and idiot for not keeping Dark aboard. Ive watched Sark call 2 of the best rose bowl offenses ive ever seen and a national title game he should have won. He called an awesome game. Leave it to you pussyless wonders to skew the factsCuntWaffle said:
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense
Sit back and relax Puppy while we educate you in between trips up to Maltby to give Franny some thunder in her poop chute ... have you noticed that your Rocky Road ice cream has a different texture and taste lately? Now you know ...
Teq good at everything
-
Wow. Did someone hack your account?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Saban's and idiot for not keeping Dark aboard. Ive watched Sark call 2 of the best rose bowl offenses ive ever seen and a national title game he should have won. He called an awesome game. Leave it to you pussyless wonders to skew the factsCuntWaffle said:
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense
Oh wait no. When comes to football are somehow the most clueless person on the board. -
The thing is that besides the UW job, Sarq inherits Ferrari talent all over the field and ends up waddin it up in a tree @Dennis_DeYoung style in the big ones more often than not. Sarc is a decent mid level coach. I doubt he'll ever be ready for prime time though. And now He's workin with a Super Bowl loser who almost always endos off the cliff the next Season. And as charmed life as that fucker has, he'll get another chance with them or some other fucktarded HC, AD or GM next season.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Saban's and idiot for not keeping Dark aboard. Ive watched Sark call 2 of the best rose bowl offenses ive ever seen and a national title game he should have won. He called an awesome game. Leave it to you pussyless wonders to skew the factsCuntWaffle said:
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense -
Doogs love Sarkpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Saban's and idiot for not keeping Dark aboard. Ive watched Sark call 2 of the best rose bowl offenses ive ever seen and a national title game he should have won. He called an awesome game. Leave it to you pussyless wonders to skew the factsCuntWaffle said:
Good to know you and Sark are still on great termspuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark called a great game, especially that masterful drive to win game at end. His offense beat Clemson. Saban's defense couldnt hold serve.RaceBannon said:CHICK-FIL-A PEACH BOWL - CFP SEMIFINAL
12/31 Washington W 24-7 COMP - 7 FOR14 57 YARDS 50.0% 19 RUSHES FOR 50 YARDS
CFP NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME PRESENTED BY AT&T
1/9 Clemson L 35-31 13 FOR 31 131YARDS 41.9% 10 RUSHES FOR 63 YARDS
In my mind I assumed he played a lot better than he did against Clemson since they scored 31 legit points as opposed to 17 - thanks brownsocks!
The only conclusion is that OUR rushing defense was better even though that was the only way Bama could score.
For you Kiffin haters, well you hate Sark too, but look at the passing attempts if you want to see why Clemson was able to hang in until they could win it at the end.
14 against our DAWGS - 31 under Sark against Clemson. Holee fuck that is bad.
Tequila asked if it would have made a difference if Sark had been OC against us. I'm now thinking it might have. Saban threatened Kiffin with death on the sideline if he kept throwing it. Sark was up in the box blowing the game and eating boogers.
On the other hand 7 points seemed to be our max output. Clemson had a real QB and offense -
People forget pumpy had Sark building a dynasty at USC. People forget that.
