If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
Is stating facts fear mongering? I didn't realize how sensitive you are.
If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
Still waiting for your take.
No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
Still waiting for your take.
No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.
Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.
If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
Still waiting for your take.
No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.
Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.
This is becoming a waste of time, you apparently have a very limited memory.
If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets
So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
You got me
Your so smart and stuff
It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.
It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.
But regulashuns!!!!
It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.
HTH
There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
Still waiting for your take.
No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.
Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.
This is becoming a waste of time, you apparently have a very limited memory.
If cable companies are losing so much money because of people cutting cable TV in favor of streaming TV services, then why aren't cable companies already jacking internet rates out of control?
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
If cable companies are losing so much money because of people cutting cable TV in favor of streaming TV services, then why aren't cable companies already jacking internet rates out of control?
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
If cable companies are losing so much money because of people cutting cable TV in favor of streaming TV services, then why aren't cable companies already jacking internet rates out of control?
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
My internet is up to like 80 bucks. They are.
Okay, mine is $50 and streams everything (including 4k) just fine. So I'm sure it varies. But let's say they already did jack up our rates....what's the concern over ending NN if cable companies already jacked our internet rates as high as they need to go in order to make up for the cord cutters?
If cable companies are losing so much money because of people cutting cable TV in favor of streaming TV services, then why aren't cable companies already jacking internet rates out of control?
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
My internet is up to like 80 bucks. They are.
Okay, mine is $50 and streams everything (including 4k) just fine. So I'm sure it varies. But let's say they already did jack up our rates....what's the concern over ending NN if cable companies already jacked our internet rates as high as they need to go in order to make up for the cord cutters?
You can add Verizon 4g unlimited to your plan for $20. Right now the best deal. And you can take the hot spot with you.
If cable companies are losing so much money because of people cutting cable TV in favor of streaming TV services, then why aren't cable companies already jacking internet rates out of control?
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
My internet is up to like 80 bucks. They are.
Okay, mine is $50 and streams everything (including 4k) just fine. So I'm sure it varies. But let's say they already did jack up our rates....what's the concern over ending NN if cable companies already jacked our internet rates as high as they need to go in order to make up for the cord cutters?
Well yeah. Mine was 50 like a couple years ago. But every year they decide to raise the price.
If cable companies are losing so much money because of people cutting cable TV in favor of streaming TV services, then why aren't cable companies already jacking internet rates out of control?
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
My internet is up to like 80 bucks. They are.
Okay, mine is $50 and streams everything (including 4k) just fine. So I'm sure it varies. But let's say they already did jack up our rates....what's the concern over ending NN if cable companies already jacked our internet rates as high as they need to go in order to make up for the cord cutters?
You can add Verizon 4g unlimited to your plan for $20. Right now the best deal. And you can take the hot spot with you.
Can you use it to watch Husky games on your tablet with your Dish subscription?
DirecTV is 200 bucks now to get everything. Internet is a bargain in comparison. AT%T bought DirecTV so when satellite dies they are in position to replace it. Business has this funny desire to make money and not go out of business. People forget that they don't exist to give you free shit. That's the gubmint's job
If you have Verizon you need to ask yourself where you went wrong in life
DirecTV is 200 bucks now to get everything. Internet is a bargain in comparison. AT%T bought DirecTV so when satellite dies they are in position to replace it. Business has this funny desire to make money and not go out of business. People forget that they don't exist to give you free shit. That's the gubmint's job
If you have Verizon you need to ask yourself where you went wrong in life
I actually travel around rather than sit in Mom's basement. And my e-coli burger joint in Montana pays my entire cell phone bill.
Comments
You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.
Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.
And I refuse to bother to learn.
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/comment/592175
It seems like, if anything, this will allow people to pay less for internet if they aren't going to be hogging a bunch of bandwidth due to streaming TV services. For example, somebody who has cable TV, DVR, On-Demand, etc.
If you have Verizon you need to ask yourself where you went wrong in life
#winning