Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who is excited for the end of net neutrality?

13567

Comments

  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    Is stating facts fear mongering? I didn't realize how sensitive you are.
    Snowflake.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    Ironic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Southerndawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    Ironic
    Ah shit, did Breitbart put out an opinion piece earlier? Let's hear your take.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Southerndawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Southerndawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
    image

    You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.

    Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,680
    I have no clue what net neutrality is.

    And I refuse to bother to learn.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Pitchfork51 said:

    I have no clue what net neutrality is.

    And I refuse to bother to learn.

    At least you admit it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Southerndawg said:

    salemcoog said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    UWhuskytskeet said:

    RaceBannon said:

    If the government is the best option for healthcare then I certainly trust them to run the nternets

    So you have no clue what net neutrality is. Got it.
    You got me

    Your so smart and stuff
    It's weird how this has been shaped into a left/right thing. There is zero reason to not want NN unless you hold stakes in an ISP.

    It would be like cheering for water companies to have the ability to charge you more for using water to make generic coffee, and less for making Starbucks. Water is water. Data is data.

    But regulashuns!!!!
    It's because of liberal shills like yourself fear mongering as if the TSIO already.



    HTH
    There's fear mongering used by the corrupt to persuade the ignorant, and then there's the ignorant perpetuating the fear mongering as if TSIO already. What we have here is clearly the latter.
    Still waiting for your take.
    No, you're not. Your only interest is in agreement that "Net Neutrality" as policy and regulation is only about net neutrality, which it clearly isn't. I suggest you develop a deeper understanding, try reading from sources other than the Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and learn a little history, this game has been played before.
    image

    You are second to Sledog in your love for biased reporting.

    Re: Net Neutrality: You basically don't have an actual opinion other than parroting spooky right-wing conspiracies.

    This is becoming a waste of time, you apparently have a very limited memory.

    http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/comment/592175
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter