Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

It has well and truly played out

2»

Comments

  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Tequilla... disagree.

    Sark is a shitty coach. A decent to good coach would have won last night. Sark's shitty in-game management and playcalling lost that game. Throw in the penalties and poor player management, and you've got a really shitty coach up there.

    It should be clear to anyone with half a brain that UW needs a new coaching staff. Its year 5. This is as good as it's going to get with Seven Win Steve.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Realized that I mis-stated my opinion in my original post ...

    Sark's proven that his high end is as an average coach in this conference ...

    I'd take him over Dykes ...

    Jury is still out on Colorado's coach and Helfrich IMO ...

    USC's next coach will be better ...

    Leach and Rich Rod is probably a push ...

    Everybody else? I'd take over Sark at this point.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    Take a fucking stand Auburn ...

    I don't care whether you're a doog, a half brain, etc., you want Washington to win every game. There's no way during the game last night anybody wasn't pulling for the victory.

    But the Arizona State game basically destroyed the myth's that Sark was trying to spin and exposed the fact that he's shitty at the details, nuances, and ideas of managing a football team at a high level.

    For all the excuses that Sark and his most loyal of supporters still had for him as a coach, these last 3 games were his Alamo. Prove it to us that the warts that we have all seen and called out for multiple years are just parts of our imagination.

    And then within the first 5 minutes of the game last night basically every single damn thing that you could possibly criticize Sark for in his tenure showed itself up in spades.

    Forget whether Sark's a good coach at this point. He's proved that at minimum he's an average coach in the PAC ... and if you are an average coach in the PAC then you are going to have at best an average team in the PAC. And quite frankly, being average isn't fucking good enough.

    Results matter. Sark has had plenty of time to display them. He's failed every single time he's been given an opportunity to do so - particularly on the road.

    I was cheering for the Bruins last night. I'll be cheering for the Beavers next Saturday and for the Cougars in the Apple Cup.

    Sark has proven at the MAXIMUM that he's an average coach in the Pac-12. This is the third season in a row where he should have been fired.

    Fuck off.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    If you are an alum of the UW, you should NEVER be rooting against them.

    I don't care how shitty the coach is, I'd put up with a shitty coach if we win week in and week out. I don't care how many cocktail waitresses that coach allegedly hooks up (pics?).

    It's the ADs job to have the pulse of what kind of job the head coach is doing and to make a change when warranted.

    If Woodward doesn't replace Sark at this point, Woodward should be replaced.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Any TCU MBA would know that there's no reason to extend the Sark charade past 2013 ...

    I don't care at this point if we win out or not ... after last night there's nothing he can do to convince me that he's the right guy going forward.

    Given the Cougs victory today, I fully expect that we'll not only lose to Oregon State, but we'll lose in the Apple Cup because the Cougs will actually be excited to a) shove it up our ass and b) to get to the best minor bowl possible.

    That being said, I'll be pulling for our guys to play the best possible and to win.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    If you are an alum of the UW, you should NEVER be rooting against them.

    I don't care how shitty the coach is, I'd put up with a shitty coach if we win week in and week out. I don't care how many cocktail waitresses that coach allegedly hooks up (pics?).

    It's the ADs job to have the pulse of what kind of job the head coach is doing and to make a change when warranted.

    If Woodward doesn't replace Sark at this point, Woodward should be replaced.

    Doog Post O' The Week!
  • Damn this thread delivers.

    We have Auburn Doog not even waiting 12 hours to back off on his Sark should be fired while Tequila is dooging it up hardcore.

    This is truly abundance!
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Damn this thread delivers.

    We have Auburn Doog not even waiting 12 hours to back off on his Sark should be fired while Tequila is dooging it up hardcore.

    This is truly abundance!

    The more Doogs change, the more they stay exactly the same.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    So let me get this straight, doog behavior means that you share the following opinion:

    1) Sark has done nothing to indicate that he's deserving of a Year 6 and should be fired

    2) Sark's not in the top half of coaches in the conference

    3) If Woodward does not pull the plug on Sark after this season then Woodward should be fired

    4) That regardless of the above, I'm not going to openly root against my school and hope that they lose.

    If you want to say that I'm dooging it up for #4, whatever. I've said 1-3 consistently. If that's dooging it up, then I'm far from the only one.
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited November 2013
    Tequilla said:

    So let me get this straight, doog behavior means that you share the following opinion:

    1) Sark has done nothing to indicate that he's deserving of a Year 6 and should be fired

    2) Sark's not in the top half of coaches in the conference

    3) If Woodward does not pull the plug on Sark after this season then Woodward should be fired

    4) That regardless of the above, I'm not going to openly root against my school and hope that they lose.

    If you want to say that I'm dooging it up for #4, whatever. I've said 1-3 consistently for the past 10 hours. If that's dooging it up, then I'm far from the only one.

    FTFY

    It took you 4.5 years of .500 football for you to figure out that "there's nothing Sark can do to convince [you] that he is the right guy going forward"

    AND you still root for him to win games so he can stick around, while complaining about people who are rooting for the only situation that will ensure that the guy you know isn't the right guy will be fired instead of given a few more years.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    If you think I just figured it out in the last 24 hours that Sark wasn't the right fit for this program, then you haven't been paying attention.
  • Tequilla said:

    If you think I just figured it out in the last 24 hours that Sark wasn't the right fit for this program, then you haven't been paying attention.

    Do you want to take the gloves off?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839

    Tequilla said:

    If you think I just figured it out in the last 24 hours that Sark wasn't the right fit for this program, then you haven't been paying attention.

    I never know what you are thinking. I usually stop reading 1/10th of the way through your posts
    Your attention span is stronger than mine

  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    Tequilla said:

    If you think I just figured it out in the last 24 hours that Sark wasn't the right fit for this program, then you haven't been paying attention.

    [citation needed]
  • JECAR
    JECAR Member Posts: 589
    Wait, so does this mean that you'll stop posting your stupid fucking power rankings on 17 different sites?