Rank the 1990, 1992, 2000, and 2016 UW teams
Comments
-
1984 would kick both their asses and then laugh about it.dnc said:
2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.allpurpleallgold said:The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.
2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.
2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.
2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.
Tui would not be enough.
-
2000 had more talent than people recognize. CW had NFL talent, and so did Vontoure. Pharms could've stayed in the league a while.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:2000
1990
2016
1992
1992 only scored three points against a good, but not great Arizona defense, got clobbered by Cougit losers, and lost three games. They're a disappointment and last.
2016's schedule was too weak.
2000 probably had the least talent, but they won the Rose Bowl, beat Miami, and only lost once.
Fucking Neu and his "Built for Prison" program derailed a lot of that. -
That secondary was legit. Daniels pharms and Triplett were all good too. They seemed to fall apart for a few weeks after williams was hurt though.Quietcowskee said:
2000 had more talent than people recognize. CW had NFL talent, and so did Vontoure. Pharms could've stayed in the league a while.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:2000
1990
2016
1992
1992 only scored three points against a good, but not great Arizona defense, got clobbered by Cougit losers, and lost three games. They're a disappointment and last.
2016's schedule was too weak.
2000 probably had the least talent, but they won the Rose Bowl, beat Miami, and only lost once.
Fucking Neu and his "Built for Prison" program derailed a lot of that. -
The '90 and '84 teams were both excellent. Both came within a whisker of being national champs. '16 wasn't quite at that level, but '17 should be. The '00 team was merely good, but with huge heart.
-
Thinking about this again...i think id rank 2000 ahead of 92. That 92 team showed very little heart or toughness in the pullman snow and just looked slow against michigan. I know there were extenuating circumstances but that was not a top 10 team at the end of the year.
-
Yeah but Joey Harrington.allpurpleallgold said:
Phillip Buchanondnc said:
2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.allpurpleallgold said:The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.
2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.
2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.
2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.
Tui would not be enough.
Vernon Carey
Najeh Davenport
Ken Dorsey
Jamal Green
Andre Johnson
William Joseph
Damione Lewis
Bryant Mckinnie
Dan Morgan
Santana Moss
Clinton Portis
Ed Reed
Mike Rumph
Jeremy Shockey
Jonathan Vilma
Reggie Wayne
DJ Williams
If only there was some example of a team that was much better than that 2000 team that they beat. -
1984 wasn't even the best team in the Pac-10.PurpleThrobber said:
1984 would kick both their asses and then laugh about it.dnc said:
2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.allpurpleallgold said:The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.
2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.
2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.
2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.
Tui would not be enough. -
1960
Was better than all of them, and defeated the National Champion Minnesota team in the Rose Bowl. -
Race was there.uzi said:1960
Was better than all of them, and defeated the National Champion Minnesota team in the Rose Bowl. -
What part ofPurpleThrobber said:
1984 would kick both their asses and then laugh about it.dnc said:
2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.allpurpleallgold said:The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.
2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.
2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.
2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.
Tui would not be enough.
08
84
16
90
00
92
didn't you understand?
