Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rank the 1990, 1992, 2000, and 2016 UW teams

GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
in Hardcore Husky Board
90
16
92
00

Helps Trump IMO
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,300
    90
    16
    92
    84
    00
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    allpurpleallgold said:

    The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.

    Azeem laughs at this post.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 65,253 Founders Club
    God bless you Gladdy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    allpurpleallgold said:

    dnc said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.

    2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.

    2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.

    2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.

    2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.

    Tui would not be enough.
    Phillip Buchanon
    Vernon Carey
    Najeh Davenport
    Ken Dorsey
    Jamal Green
    Andre Johnson
    William Joseph
    Damione Lewis
    Bryant Mckinnie
    Dan Morgan
    Santana Moss
    Clinton Portis
    Ed Reed
    Mike Rumph
    Jeremy Shockey
    Jonathan Vilma
    Reggie Wayne
    DJ Williams

    If only there was some example of a team that was much better than that 2000 team that they beat.
    They beat them at home at the beginning of the year.

    They don't win that game on a neutral field or even halfway through the season.

    I love the 2000 team, it was probably the most fun UW team to watch to me outside of 91. It was lucky to only have one loss though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    allpurpleallgold said:

    dnc said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.

    2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.

    2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.

    2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.

    2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.

    Tui would not be enough.
    Phillip Buchanon
    Vernon Carey
    Najeh Davenport
    Ken Dorsey
    Jamal Green
    Andre Johnson
    William Joseph
    Damione Lewis
    Bryant Mckinnie
    Dan Morgan
    Santana Moss
    Clinton Portis
    Ed Reed
    Mike Rumph
    Jeremy Shockey
    Jonathan Vilma
    Reggie Wayne
    DJ Williams

    If only there was some example of a team that was much better than that 2000 team that they beat.
    This is the only valid argument for why 2000 would win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    edited June 2017
    The 2000 Huskies would beat anybody, including all the other teams on this list from prior years (except fucking UO)

    The 2009 Central team which lost only to the D2 winner in the playoffs would have defeated the 2008 Huskies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    I'm still a big fan of the 2000 Huskies!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,774 Founders Club
    edited June 2017
    2000
    1990
    2016
    1992

    1992 only scored three points against a good, but not great Arizona defense, got clobbered by Cougit losers, and lost three games. They're a disappointment and last.

    2016's schedule was too weak.

    2000 probably had the least talent, but they won the Rose Bowl, beat Miami, and only lost once.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,035
    2016 team would beat every other team easily, because the players on those other teams are old as fuck by now
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    08
    84
    16
    90
    00
    92

    08 too low and 84 way too high
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgoldallpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    dnc said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    dnc said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    The 2016 team would blow a 21 point 4th quarter lead to the 2000 team. Anyone that puts 2016 ahead of them doesn't know shit about football.

    2016 was better at HC, overall coaching staff and every position except QB and kicker.

    2016 was better at passing, catching, running, blocking, stopping the run, stopping the pass, returning kicks and punts.

    2000 was better at field goals and coming back late in the game.

    2016 would put 2000 away before halftime.

    Tui would not be enough.
    Phillip Buchanon
    Vernon Carey
    Najeh Davenport
    Ken Dorsey
    Jamal Green
    Andre Johnson
    William Joseph
    Damione Lewis
    Bryant Mckinnie
    Dan Morgan
    Santana Moss
    Clinton Portis
    Ed Reed
    Mike Rumph
    Jeremy Shockey
    Jonathan Vilma
    Reggie Wayne
    DJ Williams

    If only there was some example of a team that was much better than that 2000 team that they beat.
    They beat them at home at the beginning of the year.

    They don't win that game on a neutral field or even halfway through the season.

    I love the 2000 team, it was probably the most fun UW team to watch to me outside of 91. It was lucky to only have one loss though.
    Scoreboard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,403 Swaye's Wigwam
    1990
    2016
    1992
    2000

    I think this was pretty easy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.