Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Stew on this my fellow fucktards

24

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,532 Swaye's Wigwam
    I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

    Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

    I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,358 Founders Club

    Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.



    Explains the grin



    image
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,358 Founders Club
    edited May 2013

    Salary

    Jim Mora, UCLA $2.0 million
    Steve Sarkisian, Washington $2.7 million

    Pleased to be explaining to me why we're paying Sark so much money?

    Someone sounds bitter and clearly has an agenda. Take it out of the middle of the store or your gone! :D

    Just a fucktarded guess, maybe Sark is smarter than Woodard and won the salary negotiation? Another fucktarded guess, maybe Mora's performance at Seattle and his unemployed status hurt his negotiating position and he had to "settle" for a mere 2 million a year? Yet another fucktarded guess, maybe UW is more of a "football school" than UCLA and willing to pay more for ANY head football coach? Let it play out. A year from now Sark may be on the unemployment line and Mora at the center of a bidding war :)] ...
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    Easy question. Cream Puff calls his own plays, has better dance routines, mo betta music in practices PLUS he howls and barks at recruits front door. For a 700K delta, a deal.
  • DeepSeaZ
    DeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    Hand gesture to the mouth? Jim, inappropriate.

    Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.



    Explains the grin



    image
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,073 Founders Club
    DeepSeaZ said:

    Hand gesture to the mouth? Jim, inappropriate.

    Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.



    Explains the grin



    image
    Pressing
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200

    I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

    Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

    I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

    UCLA was 9-3 with an easier than average schedule by pac-10 standards. Mora is recruiting very well. I'm not sure Rick would have had them at 9-3...maybe 8-4 at best.

    UCLA actually lost a fair amount of talent and they do have to play Nebraska, USC, Oregon, Stanford and Arizona on the road with UW and ASU as their toughest games at home. If they went 9-3 that would be a great job by Mora where 8-4 would probably be my guess.

    UCLA's easy schedule last year inflated Mora slightly but he still would have been an awesome hire for us.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,532 Swaye's Wigwam

    I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

    Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

    I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

    UCLA was 9-3 with an easier than average schedule by pac-10 standards. Mora is recruiting very well. I'm not sure Rick would have had them at 9-3...maybe 8-4 at best.

    UCLA actually lost a fair amount of talent and they do have to play Nebraska, USC, Oregon, Stanford and Arizona on the road with UW and ASU as their toughest games at home. If they went 9-3 that would be a great job by Mora where 8-4 would probably be my guess.

    UCLA's easy schedule last year inflated Mora slightly but he still would have been an awesome hire for us.
    Mora has been recruiting very well, but for the most part UCLA has always recruited well.

    Now that I look at their schedule, I don't see them having that great of a year. Their defense is going to get shredded in those road games. Hundley and the offense is going to need to out up some big numbers to win some of those games.

    Mora could very well be a big time coach like Petey. He could also be Al Groh or Dave Wandstett.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,073 Founders Club

    I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

    Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

    I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

    UCLA was 9-3 with an easier than average schedule by pac-10 standards. Mora is recruiting very well. I'm not sure Rick would have had them at 9-3...maybe 8-4 at best.

    UCLA actually lost a fair amount of talent and they do have to play Nebraska, USC, Oregon, Stanford and Arizona on the road with UW and ASU as their toughest games at home. If they went 9-3 that would be a great job by Mora where 8-4 would probably be my guess.

    UCLA's easy schedule last year inflated Mora slightly but he still would have been an awesome hire for us.
    Mora has been recruiting very well, but for the most part UCLA has always recruited well.

    Now that I look at their schedule, I don't see them having that great of a year. Their defense is going to get shredded in those road games. Hundley and the offense is going to need to out up some big numbers to win some of those games.

    Mora could very well be a big time coach like Petey. He could also be Al Groh or Dave Wandstett.
    Well it sounds like you have your bases covered regardless of outcome.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Roaddawg55, I am very impressed with your insight and your ability structure sound opinions. You are a welcome addition to the discussions on this board.

    Keep it up, we need more posters like yourself.