Stew on this my fellow fucktards

DerekJohnson

Salary

Jim Mora, UCLA $2.0 million
Steve Sarkisian, Washington $2.7 million

Pleased to be explaining to me why we're paying Sark so much money?

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Because he gave a great interview?

DerekJohnson

this post wouldn't last 53 seconds on Dawgman before being deleted

ACSlaterDawg

Because thats how much we had to pay to get someone to coach this 0-12 team and worst program in the NCAA with nothing going for it, no talent, no resources.

Sheesh! You think everything is free?

TommySQC

if you are just going to look back instead of forward, then you're going to be gone!!

HillsboroDuck

You act like 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 never happened

HuskyJW

I saw him throw fish at Pike Place with LoRo one time......that's free pub you can't put a price on.

CirrhosisDawg

Sark is running a program the right way. Building for the long term. Comportment AND seven win seasons. High fives everybody!

DeepSeaZ

Can Mora hit the crossbar? I didn't think so.

volcanodawg

just wait for the Mora meltdown. the $.7M less he earns will make sense at that point.

MikeDamone

Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.

RoadDawg55

I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

Southerndawg

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.

Explains the grin

Southerndawg

DerekJohnson said:

Salary

Jim Mora, UCLA $2.0 million
Steve Sarkisian, Washington $2.7 million

Pleased to be explaining to me why we're paying Sark so much money?

Someone sounds bitter and clearly has an agenda. Take it out of the middle of the store or your gone!

Just a fucktarded guess, maybe Sark is smarter than Woodard and won the salary negotiation? Another fucktarded guess, maybe Mora's performance at Seattle and his unemployed status hurt his negotiating position and he had to "settle" for a mere 2 million a year? Yet another fucktarded guess, maybe UW is more of a "football school" than UCLA and willing to pay more for ANY head football coach? Let it play out. A year from now Sark may be on the unemployment line and Mora at the center of a bidding war ] ...

Steve_Bowman

Easy question. Cream Puff calls his own plays, has better dance routines, mo betta music in practices PLUS he howls and barks at recruits front door. For a 700K delta, a deal.

DeepSeaZ

Hand gesture to the mouth? Jim, inappropriate.

Southerndawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.

Explains the grin

DerekJohnson

DeepSeaZ said:

Hand gesture to the mouth? Jim, inappropriate.

Southerndawg said:

MikeDamone said:

Sounds like he has a CONTRACT.

Explains the grin

Pressing

ACSlaterDawg

RoadDawg55 said:

I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

UCLA was 9-3 with an easier than average schedule by pac-10 standards. Mora is recruiting very well. I'm not sure Rick would have had them at 9-3...maybe 8-4 at best.

UCLA actually lost a fair amount of talent and they do have to play Nebraska, USC, Oregon, Stanford and Arizona on the road with UW and ASU as their toughest games at home. If they went 9-3 that would be a great job by Mora where 8-4 would probably be my guess.

UCLA's easy schedule last year inflated Mora slightly but he still would have been an awesome hire for us.

RoadDawg55

ACSlaterDawg said:

RoadDawg55 said:

I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

UCLA was 9-3 with an easier than average schedule by pac-10 standards. Mora is recruiting very well. I'm not sure Rick would have had them at 9-3...maybe 8-4 at best.

UCLA actually lost a fair amount of talent and they do have to play Nebraska, USC, Oregon, Stanford and Arizona on the road with UW and ASU as their toughest games at home. If they went 9-3 that would be a great job by Mora where 8-4 would probably be my guess.

UCLA's easy schedule last year inflated Mora slightly but he still would have been an awesome hire for us.

Mora has been recruiting very well, but for the most part UCLA has always recruited well.

Now that I look at their schedule, I don't see them having that great of a year. Their defense is going to get shredded in those road games. Hundley and the offense is going to need to out up some big numbers to win some of those games.

Mora could very well be a big time coach like Petey. He could also be Al Groh or Dave Wandstett.

DerekJohnson

RoadDawg55 said:

ACSlaterDawg said:

RoadDawg55 said:

I wish we would have gotten Mora in 2007, but I'm not sure if he is as great as some of you think he is. His team lost 3 in a row to end the year and the defense (his specialty) sucked. His defenses with the Seahawks sucked as well, both when he was the head coach and when he was DB coach (his group was the worst on the team).

Could UCLA have gone 9-5 with Rick? I think it would have been possible. Hundley was the real reason for improvement. Prince and Brehaut were arguably the worst QB's in the conference and played a key role on getting Rick fired.

I'm not a cunt like Kim saying wait for Mora to implode, but the Mora dick sucking on here is a little strange. He really hasn't done shit yet.

UCLA was 9-3 with an easier than average schedule by pac-10 standards. Mora is recruiting very well. I'm not sure Rick would have had them at 9-3...maybe 8-4 at best.

UCLA actually lost a fair amount of talent and they do have to play Nebraska, USC, Oregon, Stanford and Arizona on the road with UW and ASU as their toughest games at home. If they went 9-3 that would be a great job by Mora where 8-4 would probably be my guess.

UCLA's easy schedule last year inflated Mora slightly but he still would have been an awesome hire for us.

Mora has been recruiting very well, but for the most part UCLA has always recruited well.

Now that I look at their schedule, I don't see them having that great of a year. Their defense is going to get shredded in those road games. Hundley and the offense is going to need to out up some big numbers to win some of those games.

Mora could very well be a big time coach like Petey. He could also be Al Groh or Dave Wandstett.

Well it sounds like you have your bases covered regardless of outcome.

jecornel

Roaddawg55, I am very impressed with your insight and your ability structure sound opinions. You are a welcome addition to the discussions on this board.

Keep it up, we need more posters like yourself.