Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The laughs continue...
Comments
-
Assuming trump blocked someone on twitter? I think it would be hilarious if he set up a bot that just went through and blocked every anti trumper there is. Tons of butthurt it would be.
-
Ironic.phineas said:Assuming trump blocked someone on twitter? I think it would be hilarious if he set up a bot that just went through and blocked every anti trumper there is. Tons of butthurt it would be.
-
No. It makes him a giant fucking pussy.Doogles said:
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?AZDuck said:
I don't know why you axe me these question.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights? -
All trump all the time
-
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5? -
ohferfucksakes
Freedom of speech does not assume an inalienable right to an audience. It seems a better argument—only slightly—would be under some "redress of grievances" issue.
Further evidence that people, chincluding the president and @ReedStrong7, take Twitter way too seriously. -
Well...aids it is.
-
-
Snicker*2001400ex said:
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775
"The President has put in place an
organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before
in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday.
"That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database
will have information about everything on every individual on ways that
it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the
Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with
that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get
around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very
powerful what he's leaving in place."
Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99 -
You believe everything you read on the interwebs.doogie said:
Snicker*2001400ex said:
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775
"The President has put in place an
organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before
in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday.
"That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database
will have information about everything on every individual on ways that
it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the
Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with
that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get
around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very
powerful what he's leaving in place."
Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99
