The laughs continue...


Comments
-
I just told Harv to stop blocking people
-
So now you're F. LEE HARVEY OSWALD BAILEY, the online legal authority ?
Such a first amendment scholar J -
I don't even have a Twitter, but I'm sure the counter to all this would be liberals own free speech vs hate speech argument.
Can we ban Ann Coulter from speaking at Berkeley but not ban SuxDix3000 from retweeting Kathy Griffin's pic of Trumps bloody head to Trump? -
Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/ -
Trump is such a fucking pussy.
-
IronicCirrhosisDawg said:Trump is such a fucking pussy.
-
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5? -
I don't know why you axe me these question.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should -
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?AZDuck said:
I don't know why you axe me these question.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights? -
No.Doogles said:
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?AZDuck said:
I don't know why you axe me these question.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights? -
Assuming trump blocked someone on twitter? I think it would be hilarious if he set up a bot that just went through and blocked every anti trumper there is. Tons of butthurt it would be.
-
Ironic.phineas said:Assuming trump blocked someone on twitter? I think it would be hilarious if he set up a bot that just went through and blocked every anti trumper there is. Tons of butthurt it would be.
-
No. It makes him a giant fucking pussy.Doogles said:
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?AZDuck said:
I don't know why you axe me these question.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights? -
All trump all the time
-
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5? -
ohferfucksakes
Freedom of speech does not assume an inalienable right to an audience. It seems a better argument—only slightly—would be under some "redress of grievances" issue.
Further evidence that people, chincluding the president and @ReedStrong7, take Twitter way too seriously. -
Well...aids it is.
-
-
Snicker*2001400ex said:
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775
"The President has put in place an
organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before
in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday.
"That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database
will have information about everything on every individual on ways that
it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the
Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with
that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get
around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very
powerful what he's leaving in place."
Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99 -
You believe everything you read on the interwebs.doogie said:
Snicker*2001400ex said:
I'm just glad that after Obama's lack of knowledge of the Constitution, you elected a true constitutional scholar.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775
"The President has put in place an
organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before
in life," Representative Maxine Waters told Roland Martin on Monday.
"That's going to be very, very powerful," Waters said. "That database
will have information about everything on every individual on ways that
it's never been done before and whoever runs for President on the
Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They're going to go down with
that database and the concerns of those people because they can't get
around it. And he's [President Obama] been very smart. It's very
powerful what he's leaving in place."
Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49a_1360284775#DtskkbdOcHPizHEZ.99 -
So, #notyourpresident then?CirrhosisDawg said:
No. It makes him a giant fucking pussy.Doogles said:
I don't know man I'm an alcoholic, but is it violating my 1st amendment rights if Cnn doesn't allow me to comment on their articles?AZDuck said:
I don't know why you axe me these question.Doogles said:
Why not just go the way of Sven and create a new handle?AZDuck said:Trumpytang can block whoever he wants, but he does have a problem in that his twats are official government announcements now.
Fortunately there's an app to reduce confusion
https://www.wired.com/2017/06/trump-press-sec-twitter-bot/
Is it really restricting free speech if you can create a website or blog and express your opinions and link them to a comments page?
It's not like people are taken out back and given the old yeller treatment. You're still free to express your opinions on the internet platform.
Am I restricting me ex's rights to free speech by defriending her? Does she have a case that I'm violating her 1st amendment rights by denying her the ability to comment on my post about doing blow off a hookers ass while doing 90 on I5?
I don't agree with the fag prof about the free speech bullshit. But everything Trump says as Trump is official. If he wants to poast as @WhartonDude66_LOLZ he can and should
One of my favorite hungover pastimes is perusing the comments section of national publications. Some don't allow it. If Trump hit the disable comments button on his Twitter account is he still infringing on people's rights?
There is still hope or at least something to make like your side matters anymore though. Sign up here.
http://www.wearestillin.com/