Scott Woodward publicly says Sumlin has to win this year
Comments
-
Winning became important for Woodward the minute his own contract was on the line
-
Can't wait for him to boot Sumlin's ass out of the building in week 7 so we can call bullshit again on how he doesn't like to "orphan football programs".
-
It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder. -
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
-
Sumlin has had a lot of leeway down there with the vast majority of the fan base willing to give him time to get things done ... I've had more than a few of my Aggie friends give me shit for calling Sumlin "Black Sark" because they didn't feel it was warranted ...Dennis_DeYoung said:Very courageous of him to put an unpopular black coach's balls on the line to a fan base that are like 40% Nazis.
Some of those same Aggies started changing their tune back end of last year and are in a similar position as UW was going into 2013 -
Woodward is doing the bidding of what the big money is telling him behind closed doors ...RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
There's an 81% chance that Sumlin is done (particularly if they lose at UCLA in Game 1) ...
It should be quite obvious by now that having the right coach is far more important than a single recruiting class ... if you have the right coach the recruiting follows -
?>4-4>4-4>3-5>4-4?RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
Why every coach in the Sec Best other than Freeze wasn't fired this off season I will never understand.
Records against Saban:
Mullen: 0-8
Bielema: 0-4
Sumlin: 1-4
Malzahn: 1-3 (due to kick-6)
Miles: 3-7 (RIP) -
Once again you infer what I didn't imply.Tequilla said:
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning. -
*chinfer
-
C'mon dude.Tequilla said:
Woodward is doing the bidding of what the big money is telling him behind closed doors ...RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
There's an 81% chance that Sumlin is done (particularly if they lose at UCLA in Game 1) ...
It should be quite obvious by now that having the right coach is far more important than a single recruiting class ... if you have the right coach the recruiting follows
