Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon Bet
Comments
-
You seem to be bothered a lot by a simple number.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Congratulations on beating Slingblade and his dumpster fire program in its death spiral. Must feel special beating the team that slaughtered you for 12 straight years during its worst year in recent history. But don't let that stop you from thinking you're back.PurpleJ said:70
-
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy. -
obk's team lost better than any other loser has. They're apparently the kings of losing because they do it so well.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Little faggot obk is such a snot-nosed little fuckweasel that he can't come to grips that every National Champion crowned before he stopped shitting his own pants in 2016 was crowned based on polls. Apparently only tOSU, Bama, and Clemson have ever won a national title in football. He pretends this is the case so he can pretend that UO is on par with USC, Miami, Michigan, etc -and UW - instead of admitting they're a fucking loser program that has never won a championship in football.
obk is a little worm. He'd recognize our crystal football if someone shoved it way up into his ass. -
Upvoted for fuckweaseldflea said:
obk's team lost better than any other loser has. They're apparently the kings of losing because they do it so well.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Little faggot obk is such a snot-nosed little fuckweasel that he can't come to grips that every National Champion crowned before he stopped shitting his own pants in 2016 was crowned based on polls. Apparently only tOSU, Bama, and Clemson have ever won a national title in football. He pretends this is the case so he can pretend that UO is on par with USC, Miami, Michigan, etc -and UW - instead of admitting they're a fucking loser program that has never won a championship in football.
obk is a little worm. He'd recognize our crystal football if someone shoved it way up into his ass. -
So how many of those 12 straight wins over Washington that Oregon had qualify for the same commentary back?oregonblitzkrieg said:
Congratulations on beating Slingblade and his dumpster fire program in its death spiral. Must feel special beating the team that slaughtered you for 12 straight years during its worst year in recent history. But don't let that stop you from thinking you're back.PurpleJ said:70
-
It's too easy lighting a fire under your ass and watching you jump around and start bitching like a little girl. Insecurity about your voted half 'natty' is reasonable, considering no one nowadays really recognizes that shit anymore now that actual championship games are played.dflea said:
obk's team lost better than any other loser has. They're apparently the kings of losing because they do it so well.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Little faggot obk is such a snot-nosed little fuckweasel that he can't come to grips that every National Champion crowned before he stopped shitting his own pants in 2016 was crowned based on polls. Apparently only tOSU, Bama, and Clemson have ever won a national title in football. He pretends this is the case so he can pretend that UO is on par with USC, Miami, Michigan, etc -and UW - instead of admitting they're a fucking loser program that has never won a championship in football.
obk is a little worm. He'd recognize our crystal football if someone shoved it way up into his ass. -
Yeah except it *always* feels special pounding a dumpster fire program in the midst of a death spiral.
Felt good to shred Graham, scrimmage with Leech, etc.
I need a red-faced Mora next year screaming spittle into Rosen's face mask. -
Duck fans don't recognize our national championship - because they're cunts.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It's too easy lighting a fire under your ass and watching you jump around and start bitching like a little girl. Insecurity about your voted half 'natty' is reasonable, considering no one nowadays really recognizes that shit anymore now that actual championship games are played.dflea said:
obk's team lost better than any other loser has. They're apparently the kings of losing because they do it so well.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Little faggot obk is such a snot-nosed little fuckweasel that he can't come to grips that every National Champion crowned before he stopped shitting his own pants in 2016 was crowned based on polls. Apparently only tOSU, Bama, and Clemson have ever won a national title in football. He pretends this is the case so he can pretend that UO is on par with USC, Miami, Michigan, etc -and UW - instead of admitting they're a fucking loser program that has never won a championship in football.
obk is a little worm. He'd recognize our crystal football if someone shoved it way up into his ass.
Nobody recognizes UO's championship - because the Ducks don't have one.
Nowadays everyone still thinks you're a drippy little cunt - because you are.
Go kill yourself.
-
Upvoted for highlighting Fuckweasel -Pitchfork51 said:
Upvoted for fuckweaseldflea said:
obk's team lost better than any other loser has. They're apparently the kings of losing because they do it so well.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Little faggot obk is such a snot-nosed little fuckweasel that he can't come to grips that every National Champion crowned before he stopped shitting his own pants in 2016 was crowned based on polls. Apparently only tOSU, Bama, and Clemson have ever won a national title in football. He pretends this is the case so he can pretend that UO is on par with USC, Miami, Michigan, etc -and UW - instead of admitting they're a fucking loser program that has never won a championship in football.
obk is a little worm. He'd recognize our crystal football if someone shoved it way up into his ass.
what a great word...it's a noun, it's an adjective, mix it with "micro-wenis fag" to create fun descriptions...
-
dflea said:
Duck fans don't recognize our national championship - because they're cunts.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It's too easy lighting a fire under your ass and watching you jump around and start bitching like a little girl. Insecurity about your voted half 'natty' is reasonable, considering no one nowadays really recognizes that shit anymore now that actual championship games are played.dflea said:
obk's team lost better than any other loser has. They're apparently the kings of losing because they do it so well.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Little faggot obk is such a snot-nosed little fuckweasel that he can't come to grips that every National Champion crowned before he stopped shitting his own pants in 2016 was crowned based on polls. Apparently only tOSU, Bama, and Clemson have ever won a national title in football. He pretends this is the case so he can pretend that UO is on par with USC, Miami, Michigan, etc -and UW - instead of admitting they're a fucking loser program that has never won a championship in football.
obk is a little worm. He'd recognize our crystal football if someone shoved it way up into his ass.
Nobody recognizes UO's championship - because the Ducks don't have one.
Nowadays everyone still thinks you're a drippy little cunt - because you are.
Go kill yourself.
Hey at least you almost made it to the big game brah. That counts for something right? -
-
That bowl game Oregon had last season was awesome!
-
Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog.... -
Are you still here? Who are you again?PurpleJ said:70
-
Bring on puppy, you doogs don't have the fucking firepower to deal with me.
-
You know OBK is butthurt when he posts 3 times in a row.
-
Sit this one out on the sideline boobs if you don't want to wind up collateral damage and suck off your man J.
-
Drunk. Posting. Rules.oregonblitzkrieg said:Sit this one out on the sideline boobs if you don't want to wind up collateral damage and suck off your man J.
-
I think 1960 is a legit NC, and I don't give a fuck what anyone else thinks. We did win it on the field, against the NC, in the Rose Bowl. If the retards voted a week later back then, we are NC. So we are NC.
-
@oregonblitzkrieg proving in this thread that he's still a dumb fuck.
-
1960 Futbol'naya komanda Ole Miss RebelsSwaye said:I think 1960 is a legit NC, and I don't give a fuck what anyone else thinks. We did win it on the field, against the NC, in the Rose Bowl. If the retards voted a week later back then, we are NC. So we are NC.
Iz Vikipedii, besplatnoy entsiklopedii
Futbol'naya komanda Ole Miss Rebels 1960 goda predstavlyala Universitet Missisipi v 1960 godu v futbol'nom sezone. Povstantsy byli nazvany natsional'nymi chempionami Amerikanskoy assotsiatsii futbol'nykh pisateley. V to vremya kak Ole miss pretenduyet na dolyu dvukh drugikh natsional'nykh titulov (kak retroaktivnykh vyborov), eto yedinstvennoye, chto bylo priznano NCAA i soobshchestvom futbol'nogo kolledzha v tselom. [Pravit']
Minnesota byla uvenchana natsional'nym chempionom oboimi krupnymi oprosami pered igrami v shary. [Pravit'] The Rebels i The Missouri Tigers byli yedinstvennoy komandoy v glavnoy gruppe v strane, kotoraya zakonchila sezon, nepobezhdennyy na pole.
V yaytsevoy miske Ole miss obygrala shtat Missisipi, 35-9 let. Ole miss provela liderstvo v serii s 29 pobedami, 24 porazheniyami i 4 svyazyami. V «Magnoliyskoy chashe» Ole miss svyazala LGU, 6-6. LSU zanyal lidiruyushchiye pozitsii v serii s 27 pobedami, 20 poteryami i 2-mya svyazyami.
Data Protivnik Rezul'tat # got sayta
17 sentyabrya v KH'yustone * № 2 stadion risa • KH'yuston, TX W 42-0
24 sentyabrya Kentukki № 1 Crump Stadium • Memfis, TN W 21-6
1 oktyabrya v shtate Memfis * № 1 Crump Stadium • Memfis, TN W 31-20
8 oktyabrya v Vanderbil'te № 2 Dadli Fild • Neshvill, TN (sopernichestvo) W 21-6
15 oktyabrya v Tulane № 1 Stadion «Tulan» • Novyy Orlean, LA W 26-13
22 oktyabrya v № 11 Arkanzas * № 2 Voyennyy memorial'nyy stadion • Litl-Rok, AR (sopernichestvo) W 10-7
29 oktyabrya LGU № 2 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS (Magnoliya Boul) T 6-6
5 noyabrya Chattanuga № 6 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS W 45-0
12 noyabrya v № 14 Tennessi № 4 Pole Shilds-Uotkins • Noksvill, TN W 24-3
26 noyabrya Shtat Missisipi № 3 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS (Yaytso Boul) W 35-9
2 yanvarya 1961 goda protiv Raysa * № 2 Stadion Tulan • Novyy Orlean, LA (Sakharnitsa) W 14-6
-
Gave you a chin for being a dick. Dick.IPukeOregonGrellow said:
1960 Futbol'naya komanda Ole Miss RebelsSwaye said:I think 1960 is a legit NC, and I don't give a fuck what anyone else thinks. We did win it on the field, against the NC, in the Rose Bowl. If the retards voted a week later back then, we are NC. So we are NC.
Iz Vikipedii, besplatnoy entsiklopedii
Futbol'naya komanda Ole Miss Rebels 1960 goda predstavlyala Universitet Missisipi v 1960 godu v futbol'nom sezone. Povstantsy byli nazvany natsional'nymi chempionami Amerikanskoy assotsiatsii futbol'nykh pisateley. V to vremya kak Ole miss pretenduyet na dolyu dvukh drugikh natsional'nykh titulov (kak retroaktivnykh vyborov), eto yedinstvennoye, chto bylo priznano NCAA i soobshchestvom futbol'nogo kolledzha v tselom. [Pravit']
Minnesota byla uvenchana natsional'nym chempionom oboimi krupnymi oprosami pered igrami v shary. [Pravit'] The Rebels i The Missouri Tigers byli yedinstvennoy komandoy v glavnoy gruppe v strane, kotoraya zakonchila sezon, nepobezhdennyy na pole.
V yaytsevoy miske Ole miss obygrala shtat Missisipi, 35-9 let. Ole miss provela liderstvo v serii s 29 pobedami, 24 porazheniyami i 4 svyazyami. V «Magnoliyskoy chashe» Ole miss svyazala LGU, 6-6. LSU zanyal lidiruyushchiye pozitsii v serii s 27 pobedami, 20 poteryami i 2-mya svyazyami.
Data Protivnik Rezul'tat # got sayta
17 sentyabrya v KH'yustone * № 2 stadion risa • KH'yuston, TX W 42-0
24 sentyabrya Kentukki № 1 Crump Stadium • Memfis, TN W 21-6
1 oktyabrya v shtate Memfis * № 1 Crump Stadium • Memfis, TN W 31-20
8 oktyabrya v Vanderbil'te № 2 Dadli Fild • Neshvill, TN (sopernichestvo) W 21-6
15 oktyabrya v Tulane № 1 Stadion «Tulan» • Novyy Orlean, LA W 26-13
22 oktyabrya v № 11 Arkanzas * № 2 Voyennyy memorial'nyy stadion • Litl-Rok, AR (sopernichestvo) W 10-7
29 oktyabrya LGU № 2 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS (Magnoliya Boul) T 6-6
5 noyabrya Chattanuga № 6 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS W 45-0
12 noyabrya v № 14 Tennessi № 4 Pole Shilds-Uotkins • Noksvill, TN W 24-3
26 noyabrya Shtat Missisipi № 3 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS (Yaytso Boul) W 35-9
2 yanvarya 1961 goda protiv Raysa * № 2 Stadion Tulan • Novyy Orlean, LA (Sakharnitsa) W 14-6 -
Won't be a dry eye in Autzen Stadium that day. Or vag.AZDuck said:I just hope that we? permanently cripple Thomas Tyner in the civil war.
-
College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
Major pressing dude. MAJOR. -
OBK was awol this season sucking dick in the Bama board until we lost in the CFP
Pretty much sums things up -
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
OBK was
awol this seasonsucking dickin the Bama board until we lost in the CFP
Pretty much sums things up -
I think Washington will be more successful than Oregon in the future, because Washington is my favorite team.
-
It didn't start in 2014. It started when championship games first began. Everything before that is irrelevant ancient history. Most real quooks would agree with this take. We don't acknowledge voted championships.dnc said:
College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
Major pressing dude. MAJOR. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
It didn't start in 2014. It started when championship games first began. Everything before that is irrelevant ancient history. Most real quooks would agree with this take. We don't acknowledge voted championships.dnc said:
College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
Major pressing dude. MAJOR.
-
I rest my case.oregonblitzkrieg said:
It didn't start in 2014. It started when championship games first began. Everything before that is irrelevant ancient history. Most real quooks would agree with this take. We don't acknowledge voted championships.dnc said:
College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.dnc said:
I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.oregonblitzkrieg said:
No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.dnc said:
History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.Edwin_Bambino said:
Well history says for you that is definitely true.oregonblitzkrieg said:Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.
History disagrees with you.
Fuck off.
Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
Major pressing dude. MAJOR.
