Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon Bet

123468

Comments

  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    Swaye said:

    I think 1960 is a legit NC, and I don't give a fuck what anyone else thinks. We did win it on the field, against the NC, in the Rose Bowl. If the retards voted a week later back then, we are NC. So we are NC.

    1960 Futbol'naya komanda Ole Miss Rebels
    Iz Vikipedii, besplatnoy entsiklopedii

    Futbol'naya komanda Ole Miss Rebels 1960 goda predstavlyala Universitet Missisipi v 1960 godu v futbol'nom sezone. Povstantsy byli nazvany natsional'nymi chempionami Amerikanskoy assotsiatsii futbol'nykh pisateley. V to vremya kak Ole miss pretenduyet na dolyu dvukh drugikh natsional'nykh titulov (kak retroaktivnykh vyborov), eto yedinstvennoye, chto bylo priznano NCAA i soobshchestvom futbol'nogo kolledzha v tselom. [Pravit']

    Minnesota byla uvenchana natsional'nym chempionom oboimi krupnymi oprosami pered igrami v shary. [Pravit'] The Rebels i The Missouri Tigers byli yedinstvennoy komandoy v glavnoy gruppe v strane, kotoraya zakonchila sezon, nepobezhdennyy na pole.

    V yaytsevoy miske Ole miss obygrala shtat Missisipi, 35-9 let. Ole miss provela liderstvo v serii s 29 pobedami, 24 porazheniyami i 4 svyazyami. V «Magnoliyskoy chashe» Ole miss svyazala LGU, 6-6. LSU zanyal lidiruyushchiye pozitsii v serii s 27 pobedami, 20 poteryami i 2-mya svyazyami.

    Data Protivnik Rezul'tat # got sayta
    17 sentyabrya v KH'yustone * № 2 stadion risa • KH'yuston, TX W 42-0
    24 sentyabrya Kentukki № 1 Crump Stadium • Memfis, TN W 21-6
    1 oktyabrya v shtate Memfis * № 1 Crump Stadium • Memfis, TN W 31-20
    8 oktyabrya v Vanderbil'te № 2 Dadli Fild • Neshvill, TN (sopernichestvo) W 21-6
    15 oktyabrya v Tulane № 1 Stadion «Tulan» • Novyy Orlean, LA W 26-13
    22 oktyabrya v № 11 Arkanzas * № 2 Voyennyy memorial'nyy stadion • Litl-Rok, AR (sopernichestvo) W 10-7
    29 oktyabrya LGU № 2 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS (Magnoliya Boul) T 6-6
    5 noyabrya Chattanuga № 6 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS W 45-0
    12 noyabrya v № 14 Tennessi № 4 Pole Shilds-Uotkins • Noksvill, TN W 24-3
    26 noyabrya Shtat Missisipi № 3 Stadion Khemingueya • Oksford, MS (Yaytso Boul) W 35-9
    2 yanvarya 1961 goda protiv Raysa * № 2 Stadion Tulan • Novyy Orlean, LA (Sakharnitsa) W 14-6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.

    Well history says for you that is definitely true.
    Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.

    History disagrees with you.

    Fuck off.
    History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.

    No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.
    I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.

    Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
    Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.


    Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
    College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.

    Major pressing dude. MAJOR.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.

    Well history says for you that is definitely true.
    Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.

    History disagrees with you.

    Fuck off.
    History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.

    No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.
    I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.

    Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
    Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.


    Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
    College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.

    Major pressing dude. MAJOR.
    It didn't start in 2014. It started when championship games first began. Everything before that is irrelevant ancient history. Most real quooks would agree with this take. We don't acknowledge voted championships.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.

    Well history says for you that is definitely true.
    Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.

    History disagrees with you.

    Fuck off.
    History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.

    No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.
    I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.

    Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
    Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.


    Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
    College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.

    Major pressing dude. MAJOR.
    It didn't start in 2014. It started when championship games first began. Everything before that is irrelevant ancient history. Most real quooks would agree with this take. We don't acknowledge voted championships.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Edwin_Bambino said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Neither school will likely win a natty in your lifetime or theirs. HTH.

    Well history says for you that is definitely true.
    Oregon: 12-1 vs your doogs in the past duckade with 2 natty appearances within 4 years of each other. Washington: half a 'natty' without ever playing in a national championship game.

    History disagrees with you.

    Fuck off.
    History says UW has a natty caliber team every 25-30 years or so. It's very possible UW has natties from 60 and 84 if there were playoffs since they beat postseason #1 both those seasons.

    No, you don't have natties from 60 and 84. Real natties are won on the field, not in the polls. HTH. Every 25-30 years you say? Last year was the year to make it happen and you shit the bed on the big stage. 2047 is going to be special.
    I didn't claim natties from 60 and 84 dumbass, just said with the current format they were very capable of winning it.

    Unlike you, I've seen my team host a national championship trophy.
    Keep telling yourself a voted natty means something. Win it on the field or GTFO. Better yet, get on the field to begin with.


    Talk shit when you actually get there Doog Nation CuntWhore. Fucking overrated doog....
    College football started in 2014 is the quookiest take of all possible quook takes. You won't even get most quooks to embrace that, let alone anyone who isn't a quook.

    Major pressing dude. MAJOR.
    It didn't start in 2014. It started when championship games first began. Everything before that is irrelevant ancient history. Most real quooks would agree with this take. We don't acknowledge voted championships.
    I rest my case.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter