More Susan Rice News that apparently is not "News"
Comments
-
Donna Rice > Susan Rice.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills.
-
Purple Throbber took his Horny Goat Weed and Maca root today.PurpleThrobber said:Donna Rice > Susan Rice.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills. -
Clear case of abundance hereTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unmasking isn't leaking.Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to learn the difference.
Leaking with masked names doesn't do much -
80's gals were just the right mix of curves and cocaine-induced skinniness.Doogles said:
Purple Throbber took his Horny Goat Weed and Maca root today.PurpleThrobber said:Donna Rice > Susan Rice.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills.
Not like these fucking Plus-size models and shit this days. Fuck that shit - you're fat!!!
-
I'll bet she has a Red Herring.
-
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking. -
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking. -
Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/04/susan-rice-denies-leaking-trump-associate-intel-defends-unmasking-requests.htmlTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking. -
The tug tavern is poisoning my brain. Why do I keep opening these threads and doing this to myself? God I really hate me
-
So that article says there was no leak.Sledog said:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/04/susan-rice-denies-leaking-trump-associate-intel-defends-unmasking-requests.htmlTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Thanks for proving my point. -
The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa -
If that is true, why are consumers of intelligence now running to Devin Nunes to push Trump's wiretapping agenda?doogie said:The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa -
Devin Nunes is not part of the Trump administration. (or the executive branch)
-
Every consumer of intelligence has a fusion role. Kind of the point of intelligence.doogie said:The national-security adviser is not an investigator. She is a White House staffer. The president’s staff is a consumer of intelligence, not a generator or collector of it. If Susan Rice was unmasking Americans, it was not to fulfill an intelligence need based on American interests; it was to fulfill a political desire based on Democratic-party interests
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa -
If she is so fucking innocent why do we have tape of her lying her ass off about it before she got caught?
She makes the pathological liar seem honest -
I love the sound of desperation in the morning.RaceBannon said:If she is so fucking innocent why do we have tape of her lying her ass off about it before she got caught?
She makes the pathological liar seem honest -
Now you care about honesty?RaceBannon said:If she is so fucking innocent why do we have tape of her lying her ass off about it before she got caught?
She makes the pathological liar seem honest -
There was a leak that's why she denies leaking the information. Of course Susan Rice would never lie. She denied any knowledge of "unmasking" 12 days prior on PBS.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So that article says there was no leak.Sledog said:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/04/susan-rice-denies-leaking-trump-associate-intel-defends-unmasking-requests.htmlTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Thanks for proving my point. -
On CNBC Susan Rice said she "leaked nothing to nobody." Literally that would mean she leaked something to everybody.
-
No.doogie said:Devin Nunes is not part of the Trump administration. (or the executive branch)
The boys in Trump's administration that fed info to Nunes are in the same position that Susan Rice was in before. -
So link the actual leak this time.Sledog said:
There was a leak that's why she denies leaking the information. Of course Susan Rice would never lie. She denied any knowledge of "unmasking" 12 days prior on PBS.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
So that article says there was no leak.Sledog said:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/04/susan-rice-denies-leaking-trump-associate-intel-defends-unmasking-requests.htmlTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking.
Thanks for proving my point. -
She learned it by watching Trump.RaceBannon said:If she is so fucking innocent why do we have tape of her lying her ass off about it before she got caught?
She makes the pathological liar seem honest -
Quad shitpost because I can.
-
Mods?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Quad shitpost because I can.
-
-
You fucking racists in here make me sick
-
I would have to ax my black friends if that is the intent.HanseeHall78 said:On CNBC Susan Rice said she "leaked nothing to nobody." Literally that would mean she leaked something to everybody.
*just to show that I'm not racist and have black friends.
-
That is cute...the resident moron thinks VOX is unbiased news, Eli Lake didn't sit on the story until it leaked out and then still tried to cover for her, and nothing bad could have happened because Susan Rice said so.2001400ex said:
