More Susan Rice News that apparently is not "News"
Comments
-
Donna Rice > Susan Rice.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills.
-
Purple Throbber took his Horny Goat Weed and Maca root today.PurpleThrobber said:Donna Rice > Susan Rice.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills. -
Clear case of abundance hereTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Unmasking isn't leaking.Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to learn the difference.
Leaking with masked names doesn't do much -
80's gals were just the right mix of curves and cocaine-induced skinniness.Doogles said:
Purple Throbber took his Horny Goat Weed and Maca root today.PurpleThrobber said:Donna Rice > Susan Rice.
I like my scandals to have perky nips and good oral skills.
Not like these fucking Plus-size models and shit this days. Fuck that shit - you're fat!!!
-
I'll bet she has a Red Herring.
-
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking. -
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking. -
Understand: There would have been no intelligence need for Susan Rice to ask for identities to be unmasked. If there had been a real need to reveal the identities — an intelligence need based on American interests — the unmasking would have been done by the investigating agencies.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/446415/susan-rice-unmasking-trump-campaign-members-obama-administration-fbi-cia-nsa -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/04/susan-rice-denies-leaking-trump-associate-intel-defends-unmasking-requests.htmlTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Link?Sledog said:
Information from the unmasking was leaked. Just so you know that means telling people who aren't cleared about it. I don't think reporters have proper clearance.BearsWiin said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Sledog said:
It will be more fun, since no allegations of criminal conduct have been reported, seeing those that ordered it for no reason and leaked it go to prison.AZDuck said:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/180/end-warrantless-wiretaps/Sledog said:
If recording every phone call made in the US and world for that mater is legal I'd like to know how. 4th amendment violation IMHO at least on American soil. If Obozo tapping Trump to get dirt for Clinton and then leak it all to the press isn't a crime what is?TierbsHsotBoobs said:If you change the word Trump to Clinton, every post on this bored would be LOCK HER UP!
I think this story legitimately helps Trump by the way. His campaign was being legally monitored for national security threats and no threats were apparently found.
If I was a Troomp, I would be emphasizing that part of this story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_warrantless_surveillance_(2001–07)
Started under GW Bush, Obummer limited the scope of the program, but @NSA_Dawg still has access to metadata, which is tantamount to actually having the data itself. What will be fun is finding out who Trump's people were talking to, and why they were being surveilled.
Some of you need to grow the hell up and learn the difference between unmasking and leaking. -
The tug tavern is poisoning my brain. Why do I keep opening these threads and doing this to myself? God I really hate me
