Trade Sherman?
The only problem is we are already thin at CB. Earl Thomas showed he is easily the most valuable member of the secondary when he was out.
Comments
-
Bellicheck would. The old trade a year early is better than a year late.
-
Depends on the return ... if you know you can get a replacement to slot in for him I'd strongly consider it.
At this point, he's as much of a distraction as an asset. -
He is going to be 29 and was never the most athletic corner in the league. He can only play smart for a little longer before he is going to getting a PI every other play to stay with fast receivers.
You don't give him up for a sack of potatoes but if you can get a team to give you a first rounder I say you definitely go for it. Help out the cap for the years to come to rebuild that dreck O line.
As long as Earl Thomas is back there you can still have a great to elite secondary. -
Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract. -
You can win a SB this upcoming year so unless someone overpays like crazy you keep him.
-
If Seattle trades him it's because some other GM/Coach combo is stupid enough to think he'd be as valuable in their system.dnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract.
Yes, I think Seattle's window of opportunities to win a SB are rapidly closing, 1-2 more years remaining.HuskiesADW said:You can win a SB this upcoming year so unless someone overpays like crazy you keep him.
-
To be clear I'm looking only at his performance on the field. I don't care what he says or does off field
-
He'd be valuable in any system. It's unlikely he'd be $11 million per year PLUS what it would take to get Seattle to part with him valuable in any system.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
If Seattle trades him it's because some other GM/Coach combo is stupid enough to think he'd be as valuable in their system. -
I mostly agree, but he was a distraction last year. Chancellor at the end of the year commented on it fucking them up.RaceBannon said:To be clear I'm looking only at his performance on the field. I don't care what he says or does off field
Sherman is a very good CB, but I don't totally discount the scheme helps. If we had depth I would love to trade him, but we don't. -
Just watch him go to New England...
-
I'm not as convinced about that as you. Sherman would still be good, but I bet he would slip on any other team.dnc said:
He'd be valuable in any system. It's unlikely he'd be $11 million per year PLUS what it would take to get Seattle to part with him valuable in any system.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
If Seattle trades him it's because some other GM/Coach combo is stupid enough to think he'd be as valuable in their system. -
Not worth it unless it's a stupid team like the Browns who will give up a ton of talent (if they have it) and/or draft picks. The Hawks have a couple of more years with this core. The time is now.
-
Trade him. Recapture the salary move ahead.
Franchise > player -
You gave me a wtf when I would have traded him for a Marcus peters pick 2 years ago. Now you and I both would trade him straight updnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract. -
I love Peters but he doesn't have the discipline to play in Seattle's system. He wouldn't be a good fit here, at all.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
You gave me a wtf when I would have traded him for a Marcus peters pick 2 years ago. Now you and I both would trade him straight updnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract.
I wouldn't trade Sherman for him for Seattle. If I'm KC I wouldn't trade Peters for Sherman. Both players are more valuable where they are. -
wtf???NeGgaPlEaSe said:
You gave me a wtf when I would have traded him for a Marcus peters pick 2 years ago. Now you and I both would trade him straight updnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract. -
So both are just system guys then?dnc said:
I love Peters but he doesn't have the discipline to play in Seattle's system. He wouldn't be a good fit here, at all.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
You gave me a wtf when I would have traded him for a Marcus peters pick 2 years ago. Now you and I both would trade him straight updnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract.
I wouldn't trade Sherman for him for Seattle. If I'm KC I wouldn't trade Peters for Sherman. Both players are more valuable where they are.
Disagree. -
Everyone has a system that best fits their skill set, that isn't the same thing as being a system guy. SOYNTLTDsalemcoog said:
So both are just system guys then?dnc said:
I love Peters but he doesn't have the discipline to play in Seattle's system. He wouldn't be a good fit here, at all.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
You gave me a wtf when I would have traded him for a Marcus peters pick 2 years ago. Now you and I both would trade him straight updnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract.
I wouldn't trade Sherman for him for Seattle. If I'm KC I wouldn't trade Peters for Sherman. Both players are more valuable where they are.
Disagree. -
Flagged for insulting our cover and savior Marcus Peters. The Hawks would piss all themselves for Peters.dnc said:
I love Peters but he doesn't have the discipline to play in Seattle's system. He wouldn't be a good fit here, at all.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
You gave me a wtf when I would have traded him for a Marcus peters pick 2 years ago. Now you and I both would trade him straight updnc said:Not going to happen. He's more valuable to Seattle than he would be anywhere else. Nobody else has the defense taylor made to his skills + the culture to handle his personality.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract.
I wouldn't trade Sherman for him for Seattle. If I'm KC I wouldn't trade Peters for Sherman. Both players are more valuable where they are.
Water covers 70% of the Earth, Marcus Peters covers the rest. -
Belichick would have traded him last year before he was burnt toast in the big game.RaceBannon said:Bellicheck would. The old trade a year early is better than a year late.
