Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Rumors are he's being shopped around. I'm not against it if it brought back a first rounder (Saints at 32).
The only problem is we are already thin at CB. Earl Thomas showed he is easily the most valuable member of the secondary when he was out.
0 ·
Comments
At this point, he's as much of a distraction as an asset.
You don't give him up for a sack of potatoes but if you can get a team to give you a first rounder I say you definitely go for it. Help out the cap for the years to come to rebuild that dreck O line.
As long as Earl Thomas is back there you can still have a great to elite secondary.
He may not retire in Seattle, but they're not going to get an offer big enough to make it worthwhile to move him on this contract.
Sherman is a very good CB, but I don't totally discount the scheme helps. If we had depth I would love to trade him, but we don't.
Franchise > player
I wouldn't trade Sherman for him for Seattle. If I'm KC I wouldn't trade Peters for Sherman. Both players are more valuable where they are.
Disagree.
Water covers 70% of the Earth, Marcus Peters covers the rest.