Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Riot at CAL

135678

Comments

  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Just like with uw. The anarchists out in full force.

    People conflate these assholes with liberals. In reality liberals are their enemy
  • DawgFaderDawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    edited February 2017
    For me...on a basic level it's about supporting our constitution rights and seeing to it that our personal and econmic liberties /freedoms remain intact and continue to develop in a democratic way.

    The country has values like(individualism, equality, progress and change, work and leasure, competition, mobility, diversity and volunteerism to name several.

    Firing up the base and tearing at those values doesn't make sense. In doing so we are loosing freedoms and flexibility.

    Insighting looses its insightfulness when the message isn't balanced.

    All of the recent executive orders have been layed down to pave the way for drastic change. 1600's been tossing ideas against the wall and seeing what sticks some ideas do, some don't.

    It's like turning in a paper my mom wrote for me the night before it was due on a book she never read and I didn't either. Everyone who has a clue knows it's not a best effort and we should demand that.

    Intel, joint chiefs, watch dogs, free trade, destructive creativity, intelligence, visa are part of good decision making. Eliminating them or putting them on hold is short sighted. Over half the country is up on arms for a reason.

    There is a general lack of desire in communicating our differences. As if one adult doesn't care to or can't understand what the other is saying. Which is a sad truth.

    Watch all the conservative money dry up and be pushed in a new direction if center can't be found and met, soon.

    Bannon and Trump have won the early rounds of the "fight" but will end up loosing the war because ideas like walls and trade wars don't benefit the people who put them in power.

    CREAM

    Wu-Tang bitches

    We should be able to have a thread about it that stays on target. Have a developed dialog and have great understanding at the end. That why I'm here 81% of the time.

    And what exactly do you think his point of view and message is? Do i know more about him than you?
  • DawgFaderDawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    edited February 2017

    A different viewpoint

    I know it's scary
    The Chronic is in my top 5.


    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PBwAxmrE194
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member Posts: 8,343
    dhdawg said:

    Just like with uw. The anarchists out in full force.

    People conflate these assholes with liberals. In reality liberals are their enemy

    You're right, there's nothing liberal about them, but to say people conflate these assholes with liberals is a bit misleading. That crowd co-opted the term long ago.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    edited February 2017
    A lot of these liberals preach tolerence but can't sit next to someone on an airplane with different ideas of how our? country should be run.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 20,027 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    Just like with uw. The anarchists out in full force.

    People conflate these assholes with liberals. In reality liberals are their enemy

    Well, they certainly should be, given that liberals are supposed to be all about tolerating dissenting and opposing points of view. Too bad liberals are as bad at articulating what they stand for as they are nominating Presidential candidates.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 20,027 Standard Supporter
    DawgFader said:

    For me...on a basic level it's about supporting our constitution rights and seeing to it that our personal and econmic liberties /freedoms remain intact and continue to develop in a democratic way.

    The country has values like(individualism, equality, progress and change, work and leasure, competition, mobility, diversity and volunteerism to name several.

    Firing up the base and tearing at those values doesn't make sense. In doing so we are loosing freedoms and flexibility.

    Insighting looses its insightfulness when the message isn't balanced.

    All of the recent executive orders have been layed down to pave the way for drastic change. 1600's been tossing ideas against the wall and seeing what sticks some ideas do, some don't.

    It's like turning in a paper my mom wrote for me the night before it was due on a book she never read and I didn't either. Everyone who has a clue knows it's not a best effort and we should demand that.

    Intel, joint chiefs, watch dogs, free trade, destructive creativity, intelligence, visa are part of good decision making. Eliminating them or putting them on hold is short sighted. Over half the country is up on arms for a reason.

    There is a general lack of desire in communicating our differences. As if one adult doesn't care to or can't understand what the other is saying. Which is a sad truth.

    Watch all the conservative money dry up and be pushed in a new direction if center can't be found and met, soon.

    Bannon and Trump have won the early rounds of the "fight" but will end up loosing the war because ideas like walls and trade wars don't benefit the people who put them in power.

    CREAM

    Wu-Tang bitches

    We should be able to have a thread about it that stays on target. Have a developed dialog and have great understanding at the end. That why I'm here 81% of the time.

    And what exactly do you think his point of view and message is? Do i know more about him than you?

    Thanks Tequila.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited February 2017

    Well, they certainly should be, given that liberals are supposed to be all about tolerating dissenting and opposing points of view. Too bad liberals are as bad at articulating what they stand for as they are nominating Presidential candidates.
    I know a couple. not close friends at all, but I'm well aware that they aren't fond of my political views at all lol
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113

    I've never heard of him until last night

    But it is obvious he brings a different viewpoint

    Discussion as in riot


    You obviously have no idea what the fuck you are talking about
    Hitting close to home?

    Read his articles. Christ, it's not a hidden message.

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,111

    Hitting close to home?

    Read his articles. Christ, it's not a hidden message.

    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/03/29/an-establishment-conservatives-guide-to-the-alt-right/
    That article is like 10 Tequilla posts put together, fuck off if you think im reading that.

    From the first paragraph, "Some — mostly Establishment types — insist it’s little more than a vehicle for the worst dregs of human society: anti-Semites, white supremacists, and other members of the Stormfront set. They’re wrong."


    So right off the bat he is saying his ideology is not racist. The burden of proof is on you to show us he is a racist....
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Why don't you attempt to explain why?
    Twitter allows Trump
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    Twitter allows Trump
    The true and rightful Annoyer of All.
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Milo is an internet troll enjoying a short fling with celebrity.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    AlCzervik said:

    Milo is an internet troll enjoying a short fling with celebrity.

    And the idiot protesters keep feeding him
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,111

    Twitter allows Trump
    Trump is the POTUS
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,062
    Dude61 said:

    1964: Berkeley Students march to demand free speech.

    image

    2017: Berkeley students riot to demand free speech be denied.

    image

    Except, of course, that it wasn't students who were rioting. The students were protesting. BAMN was rioting.

    He's free to say what he likes. Others are free to call him for the crap he spews. Free marketplace of ideas, and all that. The students didn't ask BAMN to show up and ruin a peaceful and respectable protest. But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.
Sign In or Register to comment.