when ideology outweighs rational thought
This is the kind of shit you'd expect a 5 year old to write.
Comments
-
The o/u is 5 anyway.dhdawg said:http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-signs-executive-order-requiring-that-for-every-one-new-regulation-two-must-be-revoked-234365
This is the kind of shit you'd expect a 5 year old to write. -
Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
As the OP stated, where ideology outweighs rational thought ...RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
And he backed it up really well tooAlCzervik said:
As the OP stated, where ideology outweighs rational thought ...RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
It is actually quite rational to eliminate the vast numbers and duplication of EOs while streamlining to make it easier for bidness owners to track all the bullshit thrown their way by the feds
-
Going down with the ship I see.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
Governing by the closet rule. Something only an imbecile like your hero would love -
To some, it's so simple a 5 year old would think it up. Perhaps that's what makes it a brilliant sound-bite, easily digestible in one bite.
Once again, many are overlooking the media savvy of The Donald. -
Still a little chippy I see...dhdawg said:
Going down with the ship I see.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
Governing by the closet rule. Something only an imbecile like your hero would love -
Um no. Trump is that simple Troomp.TurdBuffer said:To some, it's so simple a 5 year old would think it up. Perhaps that's what makes it a brilliant sound-bite, easily digestible in one bite.
Once again, many are overlooking the media savvy of The Donald. -
I'm not sure why I occasionally graciously try with you, Hondo. But these Boreds just wouldn't be the same without you, so I won't give up on you, yet. Just give a little thought before you miss so badly on the next poast.2001400ex said:
Um no. Trump is that simple Troomp.TurdBuffer said:To some, it's so simple a 5 year old would think it up. Perhaps that's what makes it a brilliant sound-bite, easily digestible in one bite.
Once again, many are overlooking the media savvy of The Donald. -
Once again devoid of any facts to back your original assertion.dhdawg said:
Going down with the ship I see.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
Governing by the closet rule. Something only an imbecile like your hero would love
-
President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward. -
Why is this necessary given Trump ran on "no new regulations"?RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward. -
We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.2001400ex said:
Why is this necessary given Trump ran on "no new regulations"?RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward.
Sounds like hondo is lying again -
It's almost like Trump changed his campaign promises daily.RaceBannon said:
We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.2001400ex said:
Why is this necessary given Trump ran on "no new regulations"?RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward.
Sounds like hondo is lying again
Issue a temporary moratorium on new agency regulations that are not compelled by Congress or public safety in order to give our American companies the certainty they need to reinvest in our community, get cash off of the sidelines, start hiring again, and expanding businesses. We will no longer regulate our companies and our jobs out of existence.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/regulations -
coming up with an arbitrary number as to how many are "knocked out" when one is introduced. so when we find out that coal runoff is poisoning the water supply, we need to eliminate 2 regulations in order to address that. this is how a child thinks.RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward.
HTH -
DisagreeRaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward. -
True. If you have a 5 year old's understanding of cost-benefit analysis, pricing externalities, and CBO's historical economic analytics. I can see why you are not bothered.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
Agreed. The appropriate ratio is likely much higher.dhdawg said:
coming up with an arbitrary number as to how many are "knocked out" when one is introduced. so when we find out that coal runoff is poisoning the water supply, we need to eliminate 2 regulations in order to address that. this is how a child thinks.RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward.
HTH -
Could very well be. Why not real analysis determine the cost and benefits of regulations and decide based on rationality and facts. As the OP stated, this is just more mindless troompism.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Agreed. The appropriate ratio is likely much higher.dhdawg said:
coming up with an arbitrary number as to how many are "knocked out" when one is introduced. so when we find out that coal runoff is poisoning the water supply, we need to eliminate 2 regulations in order to address that. this is how a child thinks.RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward.
HTH
-
Brilliant disguise, Tequila.RaceBannon said:President Trump signed an executive order on Monday to drastically reduce the regulatory burden on U.S. businesses, requiring federal agencies to effectively eliminate at least two regulations for each new one issued.
“We have to knock out a regulation for every two, but it goes far beyond that. This is a big one,” said Trump, in signing the order that makes good on his "one in-two out" campaign promise.
Trump has signed more than a dozen executive orders in his first 11 days in office.
The order Monday specifically states that prior regulations must be “identified for elimination” when a new rule is put forward. However, the 900-word order makes clear that the costs associated with new regulations each year cannot go up. So they would have to be offset by eliminating “costs associated with at least two prior regulations.”
For fiscal 2017, Trump told agency heads that the total cost of new regulations finalized this year "shall be no greater than zero" unless otherwise directed.
“It is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with federal regulations,” the document also states.
“We will begin efforts to reduce federal regulations. We’ll be reducing them big time,” Trump said in concluding a White House meeting with small business owners before signing the order.
The military, national security and foreign affairs are exempt from the order, which puts the Office of Management and Budget in charge of the changes.
Agencies must present OMB with new regulations and show what is slated for elimination. However, the order offers some flexibility: allowing agencies to determine the cuts, maintaining White House input and giving the OMB director authority to make emergency exceptions.
An administration official told Fox News that a recently issued White House memo on temporary regulation freezes remains in place and that the executive order establishes the process going forward. -
Must you always try this hard to impress the uneducated, white trash on these boreds? Surprising someone as educated and brilliant as yourself can't figure out how to get an original avatar.CirrhosisDawg said:
True. If you have a 5 year old's understanding of cost-benefit analysis, pricing externalities, and CBO's historical economic analytics. I can see why you are not bothered.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
What is an avatar?TurdBuffer said:
Must you always try this hard to impress the uneducated, white trash on these boreds? Surprising someone as educated and brilliant as yourself can't figure out how to get an original avatar.CirrhosisDawg said:
True. If you have a 5 year old's understanding of cost-benefit analysis, pricing externalities, and CBO's historical economic analytics. I can see why you are not bothered.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
Hilarity ensues.CirrhosisDawg said:
What is an avatar?TurdBuffer said:
Must you always try this hard to impress the uneducated, white trash on these boreds? Surprising someone as educated and brilliant as yourself can't figure out how to get an original avatar.CirrhosisDawg said:
True. If you have a 5 year old's understanding of cost-benefit analysis, pricing externalities, and CBO's historical economic analytics. I can see why you are not bothered.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
I've always said Turdbufer is really funny. True story.TurdBuffer said:
Hilarity ensues.CirrhosisDawg said:
What is an avatar?TurdBuffer said:
Must you always try this hard to impress the uneducated, white trash on these boreds? Surprising someone as educated and brilliant as yourself can't figure out how to get an original avatar.CirrhosisDawg said:
True. If you have a 5 year old's understanding of cost-benefit analysis, pricing externalities, and CBO's historical economic analytics. I can see why you are not bothered.RaceBannon said:Nothing is wrong with the statements in the article.
-
The arguments against this innocuous move today make up for their lack of substance with the screaming sandy vagina approach.
Typical of the "smart" posters who continually need to tell us how smart they are because it remains far from obvious to our readers. -
So imaginary Coal run off and speculation that Trump is acting like a 5 year old by decreasing regulations on business.
The big central gubment lovers are grasping at straws at this point. No worries guys...At least you guys have a solid candidate for 2020 lined up to run against Trump. -
Far from obvious? Our? Readers. Are you confused? There's help for you.RaceBannon said:The arguments against this innocuous move today make up for their lack of substance with the screaming sandy vagina approach.
Typical of the "smart" posters who continually need to tell us how smart they are because it remains far from obvious to our readers. -
There are bad poasts. There are shit poasts.CirrhosisDawg said:
Far from obvious? Our? Readers. Are you confused? There's help for you.RaceBannon said:The arguments against this innocuous move today make up for their lack of substance with the screaming sandy vagina approach.
Typical of the "smart" posters who continually need to tell us how smart they are because it remains far from obvious to our readers.
Then there are these. In a class by themselves. -
I'm not confused at all. Seems like you are though with the questions you asked.CirrhosisDawg said:
Far from obvious? Our? Readers. Are you confused? There's help for you.RaceBannon said:The arguments against this innocuous move today make up for their lack of substance with the screaming sandy vagina approach.
Typical of the "smart" posters who continually need to tell us how smart they are because it remains far from obvious to our readers. -
Trust me, you are confused.RaceBannon said:
I'm not confused at all. Seems like you are though with the questions you asked.CirrhosisDawg said:
Far from obvious? Our? Readers. Are you confused? There's help for you.RaceBannon said:The arguments against this innocuous move today make up for their lack of substance with the screaming sandy vagina approach.
Typical of the "smart" posters who continually need to tell us how smart they are because it remains far from obvious to our readers.
