Sports Illustrated ranks UW class #20
Comments
-
If your classes are relatively balanced, your development program is excellent and the character of the kids you recruited can handle the stress, 20th should be all you need.
-
Sounds like something you'd say if you were in the WAC Petersen!!!!!!!!!doogie said:If your classes are relatively balanced, your development program is excellent and the character of the kids you recruited can handle the stress, 20th should be all you need.
-
"You can't flag a moderator's post, even when he posts NAMBLA shit on the wrong bored."
-
Sports Illustrated is still a thing?
-
I've tried flagging him because your contribution icon still doesn't show. Mods?TierbsHsotBoobs said:"You can't flag a moderator's post, even when he posts NAMBLA shit on the wrong bored."
-
20th is a disappointment.
-
Massive. If Washington is BACK!, why aren't the top recruits flocking?GrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.
Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in -
#20 is fine as a rule but is a bit of a letdown for this year. Momentum a few months ago pointed toward a possible top 10 rating. It really fizzled and they didn't close on any big name guys who were deciding late.
-
It sounds like you think the two are mutually exclusive.bananasnblondes said:Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.
Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in
You* need playmakers. Did you* get any? -
Thanks Taft.
-
They are flocking. To USC.BearsWiin said:
Massive. If Washington is BACK!, why aren't the top recruits flocking?GrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
No he didn't.bananasnblondes said:Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.
Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in -
Until the morning of signing daybananasnblondes said:Average star rating, offers, and class balance is what you need to look at, not this numerical rank bullshit.
Sark had a "top 10" class one year that was way worse than this one. It had the high ranking because he took 30 kids and filled the class with a bunch of guys like James Atoe and Cooper Pelleur, and guys who had no chance of getting in -
Ranking classes before signing day is special
-
Because the opinions of Kim, fetters and Ruth regarding a 17 year old kids athletecism and capability to develop into a productive college football player is really all that mattersGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
Sark had a lot of highly rated classes IIRC. The difference is player development.
Following recruiting is for fags. -
None of those fucks works for SIdoogie said:
Because the opinions of Kim, fetters and Ruth regarding a 17 year old kids athletecism and capability to develop into a productive college football player is really all that mattersGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
Agreed.Pitchfork51 said:Ranking classes before signing day is special
Still some WSU recruits to pilfer. -
Common myth. His classes were in the top 30 because there were so many players in them. He surrounded a few guys with high ratings with a bunch of plan D guys and Fetters 3* for whom UW was the only major offer.PurpleJ said:Sark had a lot of highly rated classes IIRC. The difference is player development.
Following recruiting is for fags. -
S
SI works for themdnc said:
None of those fucks works for SIdoogie said:
Because the opinions of Kim, fetters and Ruth regarding a 17 year old kids athletecism and capability to develop into a productive college football player is really all that mattersGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
I'm hearing new Cuog coach has all the Toledo recruits in the bag that he needssalemcoog said:
Agreed.Pitchfork51 said:Ranking classes before signing day is special
Still some WSU recruits to pilfer. -
It fucking sucks. The planets had to align for UW to get to the playoffs. This class doesn't get them backGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
You better check your hearing then.doogie said:
I'm hearing new Cuog coach has all the Toledo recruits in the bag that he needssalemcoog said:
Agreed.Pitchfork51 said:Ranking classes before signing day is special
Still some WSU recruits to pilfer.
I'd suggest a firehose to the eardrum. -
As the only Cal poaster worth a shit on these boreds, you should already know the answer.BearsWiin said:
Massive. If Washington is BACK!, why aren't the top recruits flocking?GrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
This class will have a very minimal impact on UW reaching the playoff next year. Only a couple of these guys will be counted on.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It fucking sucks. The planets had to align for UW to get to the playoffs. This class doesn't get them backGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
I get that. It won't help much in the next 4 years. This isn't and won't be a difference making class.RoadDawg55 said:
This class will have a very minimal impact on UW reaching the playoff next year. Only a couple of these guys will be counted on.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It fucking sucks. The planets had to align for UW to get to the playoffs. This class doesn't get them backGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
disagree, this class is full of really good players. It's just that we missed on some key guys (especially on OL). And now with the loss of Tui it seems worse. Reality is that this is still one of the best classes coming in that we've had in a LONG time.
-
As long as the Pac-12 and XII are trash, UW is in great shape.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It fucking sucks. The planets had to align for UW to get to the playoffs. This class doesn't get them backGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
-
So UW is in great shapeTierbsHsotBoobs said:
As long as the Pac-12 and XII are trash, UW is in great shape.DuckHHunterisafag said:
It fucking sucks. The planets had to align for UW to get to the playoffs. This class doesn't get them backGrundleStiltzkin said:20th is a disappointment.
