Bar raised for recruiting also needs to happen
Comments
-
But seriously, Ty Jones is some fuckign sizzle. We got some great sizzle in this class imo (based on people comments who know more than I do about evaluating teen boy hips). Great LB, unreal WR class, great RB, unreal TE, fantastic set of DBs....really a solid class except a retard QB, one good OL and a couple of hopefuls, and basically no DL (if USC snags Marlon). Sizzle! Just needed more beef.jecornel said:This year is a great reminder why I stopped paying attention to recruiting a long time ago.
I will stick the Baird approach. Revisit three years from now.
I will chalk up this year's class lack of real sizzle due to "market inefficiencies."
I would guess anyone's standards here for Pete is a national title?
So far his o-line recruiting is not up to national title standards. Im sure the staff is well aware of the fact. -
My issue is more with saying that coaches need to be on the hot seat or "in the corporate world this could be considered a firable offense" because one recruit and his family lied to the entire staff behind their backs.
Of course our recruiting can be better and should always be striving to get better. Petersen has not gotten to where he is today without re evaluating methods and processes. I'm sure he's not happy about this situation and will try to improve upon it in the following years. -
I think your problem following recruiting is you don't understand it.jecornel said:This year is a great reminder why I stopped paying attention to recruiting a long time ago.
I will stick the Baird approach. Revisit three years from now.
I will chalk up this year's class lack of real sizzle due to "market inefficiencies."
I would guess anyone's standards here for Pete is a national title?
So far his o-line recruiting is not up to national title standards. Im sure the staff is well aware of the fact.
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about re: no sizzle.
I don't get it about three years from now and agreeing with Baird—who just said that when he missed on kids so people didn't get on him—it's an ultimate doog-ism. It's bullshit.
Instead of bailing because you have the wrong approach, PM IrishDawg and sit and fucking listen for a while before you try and know everything. You're smarter than the average fan; why does everyone here have to fucking try to show they know everything all the time?
So you get pwned in conversations about a topic you don't get - because you're trying to act like you know everything - and then your done? Ok.
Also, so because we know about the weaknesses of the team's play and so does the staff, we should just refrain from comment?
You're not making any fucking sense kid. -
Get him DDY. Rip him a new oneDennis_DeYoung said:
I think your problem following recruiting is you don't understand it.jecornel said:This year is a great reminder why I stopped paying attention to recruiting a long time ago.
I will stick the Baird approach. Revisit three years from now.
I will chalk up this year's class lack of real sizzle due to "market inefficiencies."
I would guess anyone's standards here for Pete is a national title?
So far his o-line recruiting is not up to national title standards. Im sure the staff is well aware of the fact.
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about re: no sizzle.
I don't get it about three years from now and agreeing with Baird—who just said that when he missed on kids so people didn't get on him—it's an ultimate doog-ism. It's bullshit.
Instead of bailing because you have the wrong approach, PM IrishDawg and sit and fucking listen for a while before you try and know everything. You're smarter than the average fan; why does everyone here have to fucking try to show they know everything all the time?
So you get pwned in conversations about a topic you don't get - because you're trying to act like you know everything - and then your done? Ok.
Also, so because we know about the weaknesses of the team's play and so does the staff, we should just refrain from comment?
You're not making any fucking sense kid. -
Oh my God.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think your problem following recruiting is you don't understand it.jecornel said:This year is a great reminder why I stopped paying attention to recruiting a long time ago.
I will stick the Baird approach. Revisit three years from now.
I will chalk up this year's class lack of real sizzle due to "market inefficiencies."
I would guess anyone's standards here for Pete is a national title?
So far his o-line recruiting is not up to national title standards. Im sure the staff is well aware of the fact.
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about re: no sizzle.
I don't get it about three years from now and agreeing with Baird—who just said that when he missed on kids so people didn't get on him—it's an ultimate doog-ism. It's bullshit.
Instead of bailing because you have the wrong approach, PM IrishDawg and sit and fucking listen for a while before you try and know everything. You're smarter than the average fan; why does everyone here have to fucking try to show they know everything all the time?
So you get pwned in conversations about a topic you don't get - because you're trying to act like you know everything - and then your done? Ok.
Also, so because we know about the weaknesses of the team's play and so does the staff, we should just refrain from comment?
You're not making any fucking sense kid.
I won't pretend I know about recruiting more than you. -
I almost came reading thisSwaye said:
Pretty much this. Very few of the comments have been OH MY GOD FUCKIGN KILL EVERYONE OUR RECRUTIS LOOK LIKE THYE BELONG AT FUCKING MONTANA!!!11!!!!1!!!!1!!CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:We already have a near great class THIS year. What is so wrong with saying that and saying we are missing out on some guys. My goodness, it's ok to have expectations on the field, but not in recruiting apparently.
I'm really happy with this class, like very happy. It's just that we missed some big time guys that could've helped. It's ok to admit that. No one is saying we're gonna go in the shitter now. Christ.
This is our best class in forever, and I don't even follow this shit super closely. Peterman did a great job when you look at the class as a whole. Bravo and all that shit. But fuck man, you are blind fucking donkey if you can't admit that missing on basically ALL our early offer OL sucks, and that losing one of the best DL we have ever recruited at the very end when we have no replacement for him at all is meeting high expectations. FFS. Have some goddamn standards. Class is still an A minus or B plus, but you keep Marlon and it's a solid A or A minus, and you add AVT and Fozzy and you have a fucking NTD, BB inducing A plus. Which is darn near perfect. And what I expect. And you fuckers should as well. Otherwise let's just give out participation trophies and sustainabilty awards and jerk off to 7-6 again. Fags. -
NO ONE DOES... MUAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA.jecornel said:
Oh my God.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I think your problem following recruiting is you don't understand it.jecornel said:This year is a great reminder why I stopped paying attention to recruiting a long time ago.
I will stick the Baird approach. Revisit three years from now.
I will chalk up this year's class lack of real sizzle due to "market inefficiencies."
I would guess anyone's standards here for Pete is a national title?
So far his o-line recruiting is not up to national title standards. Im sure the staff is well aware of the fact.
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about re: no sizzle.
I don't get it about three years from now and agreeing with Baird—who just said that when he missed on kids so people didn't get on him—it's an ultimate doog-ism. It's bullshit.
Instead of bailing because you have the wrong approach, PM IrishDawg and sit and fucking listen for a while before you try and know everything. You're smarter than the average fan; why does everyone here have to fucking try to show they know everything all the time?
So you get pwned in conversations about a topic you don't get - because you're trying to act like you know everything - and then your done? Ok.
Also, so because we know about the weaknesses of the team's play and so does the staff, we should just refrain from comment?
You're not making any fucking sense kid.
I won't pretend I know about recruiting more than you.
Except Coker, 'cos he's a fag. -
We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years. -
To have a top 10-15 class is reasonable expectations for UW, we can win a title with a class like that. There are a lot of shitty coaches in college football.
-
Everything is going to be fine
-
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus. -
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't. -
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't. -
lol.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't. -
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever. It's almost like on field results matter.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
You took some shit here and there for talking about how Petersen was building things, etc when we were losing to fucking Cal at home. You ended up being right. Things change. -
Well, we'll make sure to come to you for after the fact analysis from now on, then.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't. -
You expected me to have blind faith after the last 15 years?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Well, we'll make sure to come to you for after the fact analysis from now on, then.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't. -
Look, you are on the recruiting bored, we talk recruiting. I know you don't like it because you've stated that many times. But for fucks sake man, all you do on this bored is say you hate recruiting or just downplay everything.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
You took some shit here and there for talking about how Petersen was building things, etc when we were losing to fucking Cal at home. You ended up being right. Things change.
If we would have sucked this year you would've been on here saying that recruiting doesn't matter because Pete sucks. It's so fucking tired man.
OF COURSE WE WERE GOOD! That's great! I want to keep being good so I am on this bored talking about fucking recruiting with others that like to talk about it. If this was the NFL we might have a nice 6 year run with this core group of guys. But it's not and we need to recruit guys for the future.
So go take your doogman "I trust the coaches" bullshit and fuck off. -
The one note meltdowns and twisting over the basic fact that we all want good players is what is annoying. I don't completely hate recruiting and I like to keep track of who we get, who might come, etc.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Look, you are on the recruiting bored, we talk recruiting. I know you don't like it because you've stated that many times. But for fucks sake man, all you do on this bored is say you hate recruiting or just downplay everything.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
You took some shit here and there for talking about how Petersen was building things, etc when we were losing to fucking Cal at home. You ended up being right. Things change.
If we would have sucked this year you would've been on here saying that recruiting doesn't matter because Pete sucks. It's so fucking tired man.
OF COURSE WE WERE GOOD! That's great! I want to keep being good so I am on this bored talking about fucking recruiting with others that like to talk about it. If this was the NFL we might have a nice 6 year run with this core group of guys. But it's not and we need to recruit guys for the future.
So go take your doogman "I trust the coaches" bullshit and fuck off.
It's like Boobs saying everyone and everything sucks, fire everyone as a way to say, "I only like good football."
The meltdown over recruiting basically come down to, "I want UW to have great players!"
I guess my act is a way of saying who really gives a fuck, just win. I know we need talent to win. Whether that is elite talent ranked 5th or it's ranked 25th, coach it up and win. I expect to win conference titles and compete for natty's.
Stars are important, blah, blah... It's still just sizzle until games are won. We should continue to keep winning. -
I was told there would be a point.RoadDawg55 said:
The one note meltdowns and twisting over the basic fact that we all want good players is what is annoying. I don't completely hate recruiting and I like to keep track of who we get, who might come, etc.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Look, you are on the recruiting bored, we talk recruiting. I know you don't like it because you've stated that many times. But for fucks sake man, all you do on this bored is say you hate recruiting or just downplay everything.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
You took some shit here and there for talking about how Petersen was building things, etc when we were losing to fucking Cal at home. You ended up being right. Things change.
If we would have sucked this year you would've been on here saying that recruiting doesn't matter because Pete sucks. It's so fucking tired man.
OF COURSE WE WERE GOOD! That's great! I want to keep being good so I am on this bored talking about fucking recruiting with others that like to talk about it. If this was the NFL we might have a nice 6 year run with this core group of guys. But it's not and we need to recruit guys for the future.
So go take your doogman "I trust the coaches" bullshit and fuck off.
It's like Boobs saying everyone and everything sucks, fire everyone as a way to say, "I only like good football."
I guess my act is a way of saying who really gives a fuck, just win. I know we need talent to win. Whether that is elite talent ranked 5th or it's ranked 25th, coach it up and win.
Stars are important, blah, blah... It's still just sizzle until games are won. We should continue to keep winning. -
I agree. But just treat recruiting for a class like a fucking football season, that's what it is. I was pissed off when we lost to USC (I was not happy when I realized that Stanford fucker wasn't coming here). I was ecstatic when we curb stomped Stanford, boat raced Oregon and won the PAC12 (I was ecstatic when we got a lot, like the majority of our current commits).RoadDawg55 said:
The one note meltdowns and twisting over the basic fact that we all want good players is what is annoying. I don't completely hate recruiting and I like to keep track of who we get, who might come, etc.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Look, you are on the recruiting bored, we talk recruiting. I know you don't like it because you've stated that many times. But for fucks sake man, all you do on this bored is say you hate recruiting or just downplay everything.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
You took some shit here and there for talking about how Petersen was building things, etc when we were losing to fucking Cal at home. You ended up being right. Things change.
If we would have sucked this year you would've been on here saying that recruiting doesn't matter because Pete sucks. It's so fucking tired man.
OF COURSE WE WERE GOOD! That's great! I want to keep being good so I am on this bored talking about fucking recruiting with others that like to talk about it. If this was the NFL we might have a nice 6 year run with this core group of guys. But it's not and we need to recruit guys for the future.
So go take your doogman "I trust the coaches" bullshit and fuck off.
It's like Boobs saying everyone and everything sucks, fire everyone as a way to say, "I only like good football."
I guess my act is a way of saying who really gives a fuck, just win. I know we need talent to win. Whether that is elite talent ranked 5th or it's ranked 25th, coach it up and win. I expect to win conference titles and compete for natty's.
Stars are important, blah, blah... It's still just sizzle until games are won. We should continue to keep winning.
And now after signing day, just like after the season I will be very happy with this great class and say, "we were really close to an elite class". Just like after the season I said we had a great year but just weren't quite their offensively. -
PS: I love you @RoadDawg55
-
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
PS: I love you @RoadDawg55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jLCDlHsVk4 -
I'll meet you behind the 7-11 of your choosing for my flowers and hand written apology.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:PS: I love you @RoadDawg55
-
Does this end in a Lemon Party or what?
Fags. -
DDY has it spot on here ...jecornel said:Dennis, I respect your view point. What should Pete be doing differently in recruiting BESIDES firing Strausser?
Tequila, maybe you can tweet Pete and offer to coach him to sniff out a 17 year old bullshitter when you can take some time from running your multi million dollar company.
You are all busted up about Weddington? Seriously? Holy fuck dude.
You two whiny bitches were droning on and on about how fozzy was never coming to Washington.
I'm not busted up on Wedington because of Wedington ... I'm concerned that there are some leaks in our recruiting strategy that we got beat on this year in a bad way ... so yes, I'm interested to see how Pete responds ...
-
Just call a spade a spade ...RoadDawg55 said:
You expected me to have blind faith after the last 15 years?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Well, we'll make sure to come to you for after the fact analysis from now on, then.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
-
Passive Aggressive POTDCokeGreaterThanPepsi said:PS: I love you @RoadDawg55
-
Tequilla said:
Just call a spade a spade ...RoadDawg55 said:
You expected me to have blind faith after the last 15 years?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Well, we'll make sure to come to you for after the fact analysis from now on, then.RoadDawg55 said:
Maybe I didn't watch us go 12-2 this year? That could be the reason. I also hated Strausser until I saw the best OL we have had in forever.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
Are you one of those people? Last year you said Pete would never win the fucking division while he's at UW. Just fuck off already. Your act is fucking tired.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
Everyone thinks losing Tui sucks. Sarrell would have been a huge get. You have such PTSD that when someone says we are fine you think back to Kim saying the OL was fine in 2012.
Some here trust the coaches to develop the guys they do get into players."Trust the coaches! They said that on doogman!"
That's why we aren't all melting down like you do every fucking time some guy you think should go to UW doesn't.
-
RoadDawg55 said:
I'm not beasted on any argument and wasn't responding to one post. It was general thoughts. The program is in fine shape. You're a TBS obsessed lunatic. I get it. Good for you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
First of all fuck saying LSU is historically always talented. It's not.RoadDawg55 said:We aren't going to ever have Alabama, LSU, FSU, USC overall levels of talent. That's not low expectations, it's reality. Crying about that is like crying about why Sark couldn't win a PAC 12 title.
I don't feel like getting into tl,dr arguments that won't change anyone's opinion. I, along with everyone else wish we would have gotten Tui and Sarrell.
It is hard for me to cry about every highly touted 17 year old kid that shows interest but doesn't come when we just went 12-2 and could very well be back in the playoff next year. I've said it before, it's an entirely different issue if we are 7-6 and losing Garnett, Banner, etc.
Call me whatever for that opinion, but everything is fine. It's not perfect, but we are in a good place. I'm excited to watch the team contend for titles every couple of years.
Second, I suppose because you are getting beasted on the argument you are trying to straw-man it into oblivion. No one would say we need to recruit just as well as USC.
But do you think we can ever hope to catch Stanford? Who we historically out-recruit? Oh... wait, yeah maybe.
Jesus.
