RESULTS: 3rd Annual Jesse Callier Post-Collegiate Impact Ranking
Comments
-
My point stands since that is our entire fucking fan baseEsophagealFeces said:
Any fan that doesn't remember Sidney motherfuckin Jones 10 years from now deserves Owen 12 until the end of time.Houhusky said:
10 years from now my syphilitic riddled mush of a mind will remember Ossai, Center and Buttah Baker... Not sydney jones.WeakarmCobra said:In what universe is Sidney not a fucking 5?
Jones was amazing, Im not saying he wasn't a pivotal part of this years team and a possible future pro bowl player, but to me, part of being a 5 star was would they be remembered by casual faggy fans 5-8 years from now for their impact...
I also did this while drunk, so, w/e -
I want to give some slack to psalms. How drunk was sark when he decided the 6'2" 210lb guy would be good for the dline?
I know he decided full backs were gay the moment he saw wooching. Shoulda had him play running back cause atleast when he ran into the ol ass he would have pushed them forward for a short gain.
Fuuuuucck.
Jaff lunderquest as well.
Shit I want to see those two play running back would have been less shitty then lavon and Dwayne.
Watch both psalm and lumberquest be like that other fucker merkle reece who is an allpro full back now. -
It was actually very easy for the casual fan to overlook SMFJ's contributions, because nobody would even attempt to throw at him.
-
Didnt you in years past post everyone's individual votes in a spreadsheet ?
-
Sorry about giving Crane a 2, must of confused him with someone who played.
-
Yeah we'll get that donekh83 said:Didnt you in years past post everyone's individual votes in a spreadsheet ?
-
I can't argue with the logic ...FremontTroll said:I got a shoutout!
I like to ejaculate to Mathis' potential as much as anyone but he was a 1 up until this year.
His three conference games before breaking his feet (allegedly) get him to a 2.
If he had played at the level he did against Stanford for a whole season he might have gotten to a 4.
Prior to this year he was the definition of inconsistent ... he'd show glimpses and then disappear for a bit.
A player that definitely shows the importance of redshirting players ...
He was the toughest player for me to evaluate because his peaks were at a 4 to 5 level ... but his inability to sustain that performance for various reasons to me puts him more in the 3 range of being an average PAC starter. -
This just shows how different players can be viewed very differently based on each individual's individual contribution level.Mad_Son said:
Yeah, if he played all year he was a 5. As far as I am concerned this isn't about your entire career but your maximum contribution (over some nebulous amount of time). Just because you're on the bench for a long time doesn't mean you don't later become an essential part of the team.WeakarmCobra said:
If he payed at that level. He might have been an all american candidate. He was a monster at the stanford and the oregon game.FremontTroll said:I got a shoutout!
I like to ejaculate to Mathis' potential as much as anyone but he was a 1 up until this year.
His three conference games before breaking his feet (allegedly) get him to a 2.
If he had played at the level he did against Stanford for a whole season he might have gotten to a 4.
Gardenhire getting passed is a testament to how good others are, not a lack of contribution from him. Gardenhire was good last year hence the 4.
I do generally agree that as the overall talent on a team gets better it will be harder to evaluate players that are more role players and contribute as backups and on special teams.
I agree with you that Gardenhire got passed in 2016 and contributed in 2015 ... but one of my considerations that I look at is whether the player progressed or not. I don't give credit to a player for simply starting because that's basically a participation award. But I do expect players to grow from year to year and really look at players from the standpoint of All-American caliber, conference caliber, average starter, depth player, non-contributor. -
King's an all conference caliber player ... for me that is a 4WeakarmCobra said:Also fuck all you bitches that don't think Kevin King is a fucking 5. He was my favorite player on the team. It is a fucking travesty that he was not all conference. Dude covered, played the fucking run and made plays on special teams.
All-American caliber player is how I view a 5 ... he's not quite at that level. -
That music cracks me up. After watching that, I gotta admit that Psalm got a lot better.HelfrichFamilyVan said:
I prefer the term "simpleton."CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:Sidney MOTHER FUCKING Jones: 4.95 Rating; +1.95 diff. Almost a unanimous 5, maybe @HelfrichFamilyVan, @Houhusky, and @steelheader2 wanted him to play QB and return kicks and punts too, to earn that 5. You dumb-asses.
As an arbitrary starting point, I thought of my 4 as an all-conference player and my 5 as an all-american. I went back and forth a lot on both King and SMFJ, who are clearly elite players and were clearly essential to our defense (not to mention the culture of the program in general). In the end, the anchoring bias won.
Psalm got an automatic +1 from me for the unintentional comedy. If this isn't a worthy contribution to the program, I don't know what is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qf31UepfyY4
