Washington Football: ROADDAWG weighs in on Washington-Alabama Game
Comments
-
You guys came out with a great game plan. You mixed up the run and pass and used some misdirection and had a beautiful first drive. Your D did a great job as well in the first half and had good stretches in the 2nd half. After that Bama put another person in the box and made the run not as effective. And on pass downs they have no problem getting to the QB with 4 rushers and can effectively take out your 2 best receivers down field. More or less what you guys did to 3/4 of your schedule to opposing offenses.
Hurt wasn't particularly sharp throwing the ball but he only gave it up once and made just enough pass plays and plays running the ball. But Bama always has that back that will run you over come 4th qtr and #9 appears as to be every bit as good as his predecessors.
Someone mentioned your punting game not being effective. I strongly disagree. I don't think their PR caught one the whole game and Bama was lucky to not muff a couple of those punts. The Dawgs came out strong but were shut down by the adjustments Bama made. Would another play caller made a difference? Maybe. But it was more of a talent issue. They are otherworldly. Although I do give Clemson w fighters chance next Monday.
As always, fuck off and eat me. -
YVBEsalemcoog said:You guys came out with a great game plan. You mixed up the run and pass and used some misdirection and had a beautiful first drive. Your D did a great job as well in the first half and had good stretches in the 2nd half. After that Bama put another person in the box and made the run not as effective. And on pass downs they have no problem getting to the QB with 4 rushers and can effectively take out your 2 best receivers down field. More or less what you guys did to 3/4 of your schedule to opposing offenses.
Hurt wasn't particularly sharp throwing the ball but he only gave it up once and made just enough pass plays and plays running the ball. But Bama always has that back that will run you over come 4th qtr and #9 appears as to be every bit as good as his predecessors.
Someone mentioned your punting game not being effective. I strongly disagree. I don't think their PR caught one the whole game and Bama was lucky to not muff a couple of those punts. The Dawgs came out strong but were shut down by the adjustments Bama made. Would another play caller made a difference? Maybe. But it was more of a talent issue. They are otherworldly. Although I do give Clemson w fighters chance next Monday.
As always, fuck off and eat me. -
Have you forgetten how big of an excuse making, piece of shit doog you have always been?Tequilla said:The Doogman-ness of so many on this thread makes me want to gouge my eyes out with a dull spoon
We think Harris will be good. I've seen him play well. Nobody thought we would dominate Alabama up front. It needs to get better. It also will get better with 4 returning starters, Dissly/Sample and some promising young guys. Fuck off. -
In years past, if I made a comment that said "we struggled in the passing game because of Nick Harris" you would take that as making an excuse to explain away the problems of Jake Browning, Babushka, etc.RoadDawg55 said:
Have you forgetten how big of an excuse making, piece of shit doog you have always been?Tequilla said:The Doogman-ness of so many on this thread makes me want to gouge my eyes out with a dull spoon
We think Harris will be good. I've seen him play well. Nobody thought we would dominate Alabama up front. It needs to get better. It also will get better with 4 returning starters, Dissly/Sample and some promising young guys. Fuck off.
The comments that I've made regarding Harris today are exactly the same as I would have made 5 years ago ...
As for the "fuck off" ... I don't get mad ... I just get even ... trust me, you won't like the road that I take on that. -
What in the actual fuck?Tequilla said:
In years past, if I made a comment that said "we struggled in the passing game because of Nick Harris" you would take that as making an excuse to explain away the problems of Jake Browning, Babushka, etc.RoadDawg55 said:
Have you forgetten how big of an excuse making, piece of shit doog you have always been?Tequilla said:The Doogman-ness of so many on this thread makes me want to gouge my eyes out with a dull spoon
We think Harris will be good. I've seen him play well. Nobody thought we would dominate Alabama up front. It needs to get better. It also will get better with 4 returning starters, Dissly/Sample and some promising young guys. Fuck off.
The comments that I've made regarding Harris today are exactly the same as I would have made 5 years ago ...
As for the "fuck off" ... I don't get mad ... I just get even ... trust me, you won't like the road that I take on that. -
That's for me to know and for you to find outRoadDawg55 said:
What in the actual fuck?Tequilla said:
In years past, if I made a comment that said "we struggled in the passing game because of Nick Harris" you would take that as making an excuse to explain away the problems of Jake Browning, Babushka, etc.RoadDawg55 said:
Have you forgetten how big of an excuse making, piece of shit doog you have always been?Tequilla said:The Doogman-ness of so many on this thread makes me want to gouge my eyes out with a dull spoon
We think Harris will be good. I've seen him play well. Nobody thought we would dominate Alabama up front. It needs to get better. It also will get better with 4 returning starters, Dissly/Sample and some promising young guys. Fuck off.
The comments that I've made regarding Harris today are exactly the same as I would have made 5 years ago ...
As for the "fuck off" ... I don't get mad ... I just get even ... trust me, you won't like the road that I take on that. -
You two need to get a room at the Motel 6 right next to the 7-11.
-
Perfect meet-up for a fight & fuck.HoustonHusky said:You two need to get a room at the Motel 6 right next to the 7-11.
-
Gloves are off
-
