Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
"Unbiased" Peach Bowl Preview ...
Comments
-
USC couldn't stop anybody early in the year. Even Stanford rushed for over 300 yards against USC (13 days later UW held Stanford to 29 yards rushing FWIW). This common opponent/transitive property analysis is beyond pointless.montyfranklyn said:
I think you are trying to down play the common opponent point. The link you posted was clearly stupid because Bama beat the holy hell out of Mississippi State. Mississippi State also didn't have Chad Kelly. I know you all will harp on USC changing QBs, but QBs don't play defense. They just couldn't stop Bama.AlCzervik said:
You missed the point.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Alabama&loser=Washington&year=2016&method=2AlCzervik said:
Probably the opposite of what USC did when they lost by 17 to a team UW beat 44-6. CHRIST.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?sport=CFB&winner=Washington&loser=Alabama&year=2016&method=2
Game's in two days. Well see then. -
The USC exhibition game had zero impact on the Huskies season as evidenced by the fact Washington is two games away from winning the National Championship.
That scrimmage against USC's team speed gave UW an opportunity to prepare for Saturday -
Those Ole Miss teams have talent, but will always be poorly coached and undisciplined. They are more or less the same team every year.Secfans said:
Oh I'm not thinking that at all. I've already said here that transitive property only works across a body of work, not one isolated game with isolated circumstances. I wasn't asking in relation to how Alabama handled them, but more in the frame of - that's the only good team you played.RoadDawg55 said:
So, the USC loss looks bad considering Alabama beat them 52-3. UW would probably plunger Ole Miss, but I wouldn't think we were beating Alabama because you had a tough time with them.
Alabama lost to Ole Miss last year, but played like 10 bowl teams (who went 8-2 or something in their bowls). It's just hard to know who this UW team is considering it's one year removed from 7-6 and played such a bad schedule.
But like 2014 OSU, outside of the one loss, UW rolled right through their schedule.
UW is well coached, disciplined, and also has a lot of talent. There are a lot of future pro's starters on this UW team. That said, you guys are a juggernaut so while I think we can win, I don't really expect to. -
I know you've all been waiting, so I'll chime in:
All our fans (Bama) are amazed by how calmly our true freshman QB can throw bad passes. That poise makes him the best thing since sliced bread. But, in the grand scheme of things, I think accurate passes might help the team. He was improving at the end of the year, but a 5-week layoff might set him back. However, if he can make good passes, this is the most talented GROUP of receivers Bama has had under Saban.
The running game - Kiffin is opposed. We have some great RB's and a pretty good OL that we generally don't use until after we've wasted a half by "setting up the run" with a bunch of failed sweeps and cutesy bullshit.
Defense. UW won't run on Bama and Bama won't have to commit extra guys to stop them. Nobody runs on this team. So, just go ahead and assume you'll have to win by throwing the ball. Alabama has a great pass rush but if they don't get there, have been susceptible to big chunk passes downfield.
Losing our All-America candidate safety earlier in the year has cut back on our non-offensive touchdowns a bit. On the other hand, Hurts is good for at least one fumble and interception in the first half. So, take those and enjoy. You're welcome.
Petersen is a great coach, but I think Bama will be focused. And the Tide has a huge talent advantage.
Now you all know. I'm willing to buy your tickets at 25% of face value. -
This place was fagged out long before I showed.dflea said:
It's funny that you decided to fag out HH this week since your shit team is done playing shit football for the year.salemcoog said:
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed.
You should go kill yourself before your shit team starts playing shit football again next year.
You sound stressed...
You should relax and have a smoke. -
He has to work this week. Cut him a little slack.
-
Your labia is awfully swollen, cuog.salemcoog said:
This place was fagged out long before I showed.dflea said:
It's funny that you decided to fag out HH this week since your shit team is done playing shit football for the year.salemcoog said:
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed.
You should go kill yourself before your shit team starts playing shit football again next year.
You sound stressed...
You should relax and have a smoke.
Pull it together, or bring back our @beelzebub. -
You're struggling here.salemcoog said:
This place was fagged out long before I showed.dflea said:
It's funny that you decided to fag out HH this week since your shit team is done playing shit football for the year.salemcoog said:
Great write up.Mad_Son said:
Nothing. I 100% fully believe we handed them the game with terrible offensive playcalling. USC was playing well and have a lot of talent. They played a good game with good players but did not dominate. The defense held them to 24 points despite spending all day on the field. The issue was our offense was asked to only do the things they couldn't do.montyfranklyn said:
Serious question: From your perspective, what did USC do to dominate and control the game earlier this season?Mad_Son said:
Some light reading for youmontyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
https://www.google.com/search?q=5+reasons+ossai&oq=5+reasons+ossai&aqs=chrome..69i57.6360j0j4&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
We barely ran the ball, and when asked to they were lateral runs. USC, like Alabama, is too fast and athletic to run lateral on. After a few failed, bad run calls, the run game was abandoned.
We put ourselves behind early by trying to force trick plays and deep balls. USC was too athletic to get away with forcing trick plays. Like everyone other than our offensive coordinator knows you have to set those up through actually passing football first. He was told that teams with explosive plays win but he does not understand that is correlative, not casual, so he tries to manufacture them. Same thing goes for deep balls. Browning is not good at deep balls but he was asked to throw them early and often. John ross can run circles beneath an under thrown deep ball against Cal but not a team like USC or Bama. Deep balls were a constant play call the second half, getting increasingly desperate.
The key to beating USC for us was to stick to our strengths, take what was given, and only go for a big play once it was properly set up. We did nothing of the sort though.
Lemme shorten it up for ya.
They put a little pressure on our noodle arm QB and he shit the bed.
You should go kill yourself before your shit team starts playing shit football again next year.
You sound stressed...
You should relax and have a smoke.
You should die and see if that helps. -
I'll take a 2014 Ohio State result
-
Agree with you 100% my friend. Speed, speed, speed. this is the fastest team Washington has had this century, maybe since 1991! John Ross XIV, Charlie McClutchins, Dwayne Warshington, Azeem Victor, Buttah Baker, Grayson Gunheim, Johnny Durocher, Cody Burns, Ossai, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but we bring a new dimension that the program has not had in years, speed.montyfranklyn said:
Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with itH_D said:
Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!montyfranklyn said:Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple
