Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
"Unbiased" Peach Bowl Preview ...
Comments
-
The last comments tell me 1) that you don't understand what we do defensively and 2) as Dennis mentioned it is difficult to watch games and understand what happened
-
Did I fucking stutter?
No, I think you spoke a perfectly clear incorrect statement. -
Stats are for losers. It's like revenge of the nerds in here. I just rolled over to your bama board. You guys are some cocky fucks. "We are so much more talented than them across the board it's pitiful." Seriously, fuck you and your fucking stats and your fucking entitled fans. The best part is Sark is your fucking OC next year. You have no idea how bad that is going to be. We lived through it. Sark is the X-factor in this game if he's giving any input on this game.
Actually, you allow 82% of opponent averages rushing the ball. Which is good, it's not elite. But outside of Stanford, who was down two linemen, the decent running teams you faced (Arizona, Utah, Oregon, Oregon St) all hit around their averages (or exceeded them).Secfans said:We will stop the run. yes, I understand that is a profound statement for you to comprehend but it's going to come down to QB play if you want to score points on offense.
Alabama will run for 200+ and exceed 5 YPC.
Again, the game isn't unwinnable for Washington, but you're arguing the wrong thing here. The match up against Alabama's run game isn't good for you. Your offensive skill players against basically anyone is.
-
That hit was enough to make him suck for a month? I don't think that's accurate. If so, I'm going to really start thinking the PAC 12 is soft. It's more likely that Oregon sucked this year. Like really really bad. And they finally started getting a little bit more continuity and identity under Herbert towards the end of the year - given that Washington was Herbert's first start.Secfans said:
Against the games following Washington he went 15 carries (CAL), 17 carries (ASU), 10 carries + 2 receptions (USC). Which is about average for him to that point in the season.
And if you think Alabama's running game is in any way comparable to Oregon's, you've not watched much football. It's completely different.
This has to be Tequilla using an alt handle. -
Does this guy realize 13 teams in the SEC lost at least four games this year? It's not vastly superior to anything anymore (it never was). "In the SEC, you'll get run over if you don't have at least five NFL players in your front seven." Christ.
-
Fast forwarded a few minutes into that video and heard him say our DL is "small". Sure.gif
I'd call our DL a lot of things but small isn't one of them. Maybe if you include Wooching but he's really an LB. -
No, I think you spoke a perfectly clear incorrect statement.Secfans said:Did I fucking stutter?
I don't think anyone that brags about supported Browning for Heisman should be popping off about incorrect statements. -
Stats are for losers. It's like revenge of the nerds in here.
Eh. How teams compare against a season full of unit averages is pretty telling. I'm at least supporting my positions with more than 'because I like UW so I really want it to be true'I just rolled over to your bama board. You guys are some cocky fucks.
Yeah, y'all are a big ol sack of humble over here. Wait...Does this guy realize 13 teams in the SEC lost at least four games this year? It's not vastly superior to anything anymore (it never was).
Yeah, nothing says you're a great conference like having a couple of teams who beat everyone, and the entire rest of the conference is trash. And those teams who beat everyone in conference couldn't beat anyone out of conference. Name your big OOC win this year, hell name a good team the PAC12 played competitively out of conference (Eastern Washington loss doesn't count). UCLA's OT loss to TAMU was the best win you had. But Rosen barely played the conf slate this year...
Your South champion got jail sexed by Michigan. Your South runner up lost 52-6 to us. Your best OOC win was Idaho, and your North runner up lost to EWU, Boise, and now Minnesota.
Kentucky has a better OOC win than anyone in the PAC12.I don't think anyone that brags about supported Browning for Heisman should be popping off about incorrect statements.
You missed the point of why I made that comment...like entirely.
-
Eh. How teams compare against a season full of unit averages is pretty telling. I'm at least supporting my positions with more than 'because I like UW so I really want it to be true'Secfans said:Stats are for losers. It's like revenge of the nerds in here.
I just rolled over to your bama board. You guys are some cocky fucks.
Yeah, y'all are a big ol sack of humble of here. Wait...Does this guy realize 13 teams in the SEC lost at least four games this year? It's not vastly superior to anything anymore (it never was).
Yeah, nothing says you're a great conference like having a couple of teams who beat everyone, and the entire rest of the conference is trash. And those teams who beat everyone in conference couldn't beat anyone out of conference. Name your big OOC win this year, hell name a good team the PAC12 played competitively out of conference (Eastern Washington loss doesn't count). UCLA's OT loss to TAMU was the best win you had. But Rosen barely played the conf slate this year...
Your South champion got jail sexed by Michigan. Your South runner up lost 52-6 to us. Your best OOC win was Idaho, and your North runner up lost to EWU, Boise, and now Minnesota.
Kentucky has a better OOC win than anyone in the PAC12.
Spreadsheets and OOC SOS talk...
I thought Bama fans knew footbaw??? -
You've posted a couple of times here without providing any detail. Such is your right, I'm just a visitor. Just seems weird.Tequilla said:The last comments tell me 1) that you don't understand what we do defensively and 2) as Dennis mentioned it is difficult to watch games and understand what happened
You cannot have listened to that 46 minute show and your takeaway was that you don't think we understand what you do defensively. I assume you're conflating my confidence in Alabama's run game having success against your defense with me not understanding what you do defensively. I can think Alabama will do well and still understand what you do completely. They are mutually exclusive.
It isn't difficult to watch games and understand what happened. I'm not sure I follow what you're saying here. Either it's so over the top condescending that I'm not getting it, or it's some inside baseball that I'm not following because of my lack of time here.
