Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
What happens when
2001400ex
Member Posts: 29,457
in Tug Tavern
Trump openly questions the nation's security officials while he is president. Just wondering.
https://gma.yahoo.com/trump-denial-evidence-grows-spymaster-putin-behind-election-055510203--abc-news-topstories.html#
https://gma.yahoo.com/trump-denial-evidence-grows-spymaster-putin-behind-election-055510203--abc-news-topstories.html#
Comments
-
Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?
Fuck off -
It will mean Hillary lost, still isn't President and we will be better off.
-
I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.RaceBannon said:Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?
Fuck off
Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.
It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world. -
You seem obsessed with Hillary. I don't give a shit that she lost. I do think it's funny how your chosen leader is such a dumbfuck and you see it but won't admit it.doogie said:It will mean Hillary lost, still isn't President and we will be better off.
-
But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war2001400ex said:
I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.RaceBannon said:Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?
Fuck off
Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.
It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.
It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack -
It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.RaceBannon said:
But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war2001400ex said:
I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.RaceBannon said:Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?
Fuck off
Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.
It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.
It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back. -
So Putin doctored the emails?
-
This is stereotypical toddler behavior when they get caught doing something they knew was wrong.
-
Exactly, it's like blaming the snitch who rats you out to the "police" (sorry Hondo for the bad language) after you commit armed robbery.doogie said:This is stereotypical toddler behavior when they get caught doing something they knew was wrong.
-
You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta2001400ex said:
It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.RaceBannon said:
But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war2001400ex said:
I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.RaceBannon said:Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?
Fuck off
Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.
It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.
It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.
I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.
I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point
