Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What happens when

2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
Trump openly questions the nation's security officials while he is president. Just wondering.

https://gma.yahoo.com/trump-denial-evidence-grows-spymaster-putin-behind-election-055510203--abc-news-topstories.html#

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,599 Founders Club
    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    It will mean Hillary lost, still isn't President and we will be better off.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    It will mean Hillary lost, still isn't President and we will be better off.

    You seem obsessed with Hillary. I don't give a shit that she lost. I do think it's funny how your chosen leader is such a dumbfuck and you see it but won't admit it.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,599 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
    But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

    If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

    It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
    But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

    If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

    It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
    It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

    I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,520
    edited December 2016
    So Putin doctored the emails?
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    This is stereotypical toddler behavior when they get caught doing something they knew was wrong.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,520
    edited December 2016
    doogie said:

    This is stereotypical toddler behavior when they get caught doing something they knew was wrong.

    Exactly, it's like blaming the snitch who rats you out to the "police" (sorry Hondo for the bad language) after you commit armed robbery.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,599 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
    But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

    If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

    It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
    It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

    I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.
    You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

    I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

    I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
    But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

    If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

    It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
    It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

    I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.
    You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

    I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

    I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point
    Komo4 buttfucker
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 107,599 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
    But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

    If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

    It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
    It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

    I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.
    You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

    I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

    I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point
    Komo4 buttfucker
    Like I said, I'm speaking to those with an IQ over 70
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

    Fuck off

    I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

    Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

    It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.
    But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

    If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

    It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack
    It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

    I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.
    You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

    I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

    I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point
    Komo4 buttfucker
    Like I said, I'm speaking to those with an IQ over 70
    I'd think anyone with an IQ over 70 would appreciate reading actual facts from a reputable source. Rather than just blindly believe a rambling old man whose time has passed him.
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    you still aren't any better at this then when you started.
Sign In or Register to comment.