What happens when

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

Fuck off

I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.

But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack

It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.

You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point

Komo4 buttfucker

RaceBannon

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

Fuck off

I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.

But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack

It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.

You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point

Komo4 buttfucker

Like I said, I'm speaking to those with an IQ over 70

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Did Obama believe that Saddam had WMDs? Did he listen when his advisers told him not to cut and run from Iraq?

Fuck off

I'm pretty sure everyone knew there was no meaningful WMDs in Iraq by the time Obama was voted into the Senate in 2005.

Iraq wanted the US the fuck out of there and Obama withdrew from Iraq according to the schedule in the agreement signed by Bush. Not to mention it would have taken approval from the Iraqi Parliament for us to stay in Iraq longer than the agreement. Or we would have been at war with Iraq again.

It's almost like facts are meaningless in your world.

But SEVENTEEN agencies said they were there when Obama opposed the war

If Obama had to leave why did he send troops back? Why was he too weak to get an agreement to keep them there? He was told by his advisers to stay.

It's almost like your a cock sucking partisan hack

It's almost like you are purveyor of fake news. Show me a link where 17 agencies said there were WMDs in Iraq.

I won't even get into you saying in one post that Obama pulled out of Iraq and was weak in Iraq. But the next post you say he sent troops back.

You can find the information when you link to the SEVENTEEN agencies saying the Russians hacked Podesta

I understand that your limited intellect is unable to piece together why I would say that your lame excuse for Obama being to weak to get an agreement to keep the troops there is undermined by him sending them back without an agreement.

I figure those here with an IQ over 70 get the point

Komo4 buttfucker

Like I said, I'm speaking to those with an IQ over 70

I'd think anyone with an IQ over 70 would appreciate reading actual facts from a reputable source. Rather than just blindly believe a rambling old man whose time has passed him.

doogie

you still aren't any better at this then when you started.