Lose to Both UCLA & OSU...
The ubers are already pissed according to HFNY. He also noted something at the end of last year that even AANDY touched on...which was that the ubers were pleased with Wilcox but not with Sark. So HFNY's post has credibility whereas we know Kim/Samek/Eklund have no more fucking clue than any of us. They are just parroting pro-Sark crap.
After ASU all but the doogliest of doogs (Section14 types) basically realized Sark had to go. What happens after we lose to both UCLA & OSU? I think its almost a nail in the coffin regardless of the AC. Everyone knew we had to improve on the road and 1-4 would be a disaster. 6-5 going into the AC would mean we went 2-5 in last 7 games. The lack of attendence last night also helped and I bet we see the same thing the last two home games.
Comments
-
I'm not sure about that after reading on the board that Woodward said he was pleased with Sark's incremental progress. He should get fired, but I question if he will.
Common sense says Sark would get fired in that scenario, but with this AD and our past history, who knows? -
Lose those two games and we find out if UW cares about football again or if the program truly is buried forever under the manboobs of its former coach.
-
Disagree. Your inner doog is pressing for what it wants, not what is logical based on facts accumulated over the Gilby-Neu-Tytanic-Sark era.HeretoBeatmyChest said:And I think better than 50% odds Sark gets fired.
The ubers are already pissed according to HFNY. He also noted something at the end of last year that even AANDY touched on...which was that the ubers were pleased with Wilcox but not with Sark. So HFNY's post has credibility whereas we know Kim/Samek/Eklund have no more fucking clue than any of us. They are just parroting pro-Sark crap.
After ASU all but the doogliest of doogs (Section14 types) basically realized Sark had to go. What happens after we lose to both UCLA & OSU? I think its almost a nail in the coffin regardless of the AC. Everyone knew we had to improve on the road and 1-4 would be a disaster. 6-5 going into the AC would mean we went 2-5 in last 7 games. The lack of attendence last night also helped and I bet we see the same thing the last two home games.
You want Sark on that wall. You need Sark on that wall. Drink the Kool-aid. Fellate Pool Boy. Good doog, good doog.
My work is done here. -
LEAVEDingaLing said:
Disagree. Your inner doog is pressing for what it wants, not what is logical based on facts accumulated over the Gilby-Neu-Tytanic-Sark era.HeretoBeatmyChest said:And I think better than 50% odds Sark gets fired.
The ubers are already pissed according to HFNY. He also noted something at the end of last year that even AANDY touched on...which was that the ubers were pleased with Wilcox but not with Sark. So HFNY's post has credibility whereas we know Kim/Samek/Eklund have no more fucking clue than any of us. They are just parroting pro-Sark crap.
After ASU all but the doogliest of doogs (Section14 types) basically realized Sark had to go. What happens after we lose to both UCLA & OSU? I think its almost a nail in the coffin regardless of the AC. Everyone knew we had to improve on the road and 1-4 would be a disaster. 6-5 going into the AC would mean we went 2-5 in last 7 games. The lack of attendence last night also helped and I bet we see the same thing the last two home games.
You want Sark on that wall. You need Sark on that wall. Drink the Kool-aid. Fellate Pool Boy. Good doog, good doog.
My work is done here. -
Chest, I hope you are right. Hope, too, we lose to UCLA and OSU, and WSU for good measure.
I don't enjoy rooting against the present Huskies. The players are victims of a dreckfest disaster that has no chance of being remedied as long as Sark is HC. I look to a better future.
Think Chest does too. This makes us doogs? If you think so, fuck yourself. -
Homebrew_Dawg said:
LEAVEDingaLing said:
Disagree. Your inner doog is pressing for what it wants, not what is logical based on facts accumulated over the Gilby-Neu-Tytanic-Sark era.HeretoBeatmyChest said:And I think better than 50% odds Sark gets fired.
The ubers are already pissed according to HFNY. He also noted something at the end of last year that even AANDY touched on...which was that the ubers were pleased with Wilcox but not with Sark. So HFNY's post has credibility whereas we know Kim/Samek/Eklund have no more fucking clue than any of us. They are just parroting pro-Sark crap.
After ASU all but the doogliest of doogs (Section14 types) basically realized Sark had to go. What happens after we lose to both UCLA & OSU? I think its almost a nail in the coffin regardless of the AC. Everyone knew we had to improve on the road and 1-4 would be a disaster. 6-5 going into the AC would mean we went 2-5 in last 7 games. The lack of attendence last night also helped and I bet we see the same thing the last two home games.
You want Sark on that wall. You need Sark on that wall. Drink the Kool-aid. Fellate Pool Boy. Good doog, good doog.
My work is done here.
It's ok. You just don't "get it."
Whooooooshhhhhh
Neg rep me again, please, oh baby, make me come with your neg votes oh ohohohoh -
My gut says sark will be overstaying his welcome in montlake.
-
Whatever. If inside joke, fine I don't get it.DingaLing said:Homebrew_Dawg said:
LEAVEDingaLing said:
Disagree. Your inner doog is pressing for what it wants, not what is logical based on facts accumulated over the Gilby-Neu-Tytanic-Sark era.HeretoBeatmyChest said:And I think better than 50% odds Sark gets fired.
The ubers are already pissed according to HFNY. He also noted something at the end of last year that even AANDY touched on...which was that the ubers were pleased with Wilcox but not with Sark. So HFNY's post has credibility whereas we know Kim/Samek/Eklund have no more fucking clue than any of us. They are just parroting pro-Sark crap.
After ASU all but the doogliest of doogs (Section14 types) basically realized Sark had to go. What happens after we lose to both UCLA & OSU? I think its almost a nail in the coffin regardless of the AC. Everyone knew we had to improve on the road and 1-4 would be a disaster. 6-5 going into the AC would mean we went 2-5 in last 7 games. The lack of attendence last night also helped and I bet we see the same thing the last two home games.
You want Sark on that wall. You need Sark on that wall. Drink the Kool-aid. Fellate Pool Boy. Good doog, good doog.
My work is done here.
It's ok. You just don't "get it."
Whooooooshhhhhh
Neg rep me again, please, oh baby, make me cumcomewith your neg votes oh ohohohoh
Elaborate? -
If you really think I want Sark "on that wall" or want to "fellate pool boy" or "drink the Kool aid", then I cannot help you.Homebrew_Dawg said:
Whatever. If inside joke, fine I don't get it.DingaLing said:Homebrew_Dawg said:
LEAVEDingaLing said:
Disagree. Your inner doog is pressing for what it wants, not what is logical based on facts accumulated over the Gilby-Neu-Tytanic-Sark era.HeretoBeatmyChest said:And I think better than 50% odds Sark gets fired.
The ubers are already pissed according to HFNY. He also noted something at the end of last year that even AANDY touched on...which was that the ubers were pleased with Wilcox but not with Sark. So HFNY's post has credibility whereas we know Kim/Samek/Eklund have no more fucking clue than any of us. They are just parroting pro-Sark crap.
After ASU all but the doogliest of doogs (Section14 types) basically realized Sark had to go. What happens after we lose to both UCLA & OSU? I think its almost a nail in the coffin regardless of the AC. Everyone knew we had to improve on the road and 1-4 would be a disaster. 6-5 going into the AC would mean we went 2-5 in last 7 games. The lack of attendence last night also helped and I bet we see the same thing the last two home games.
You want Sark on that wall. You need Sark on that wall. Drink the Kool-aid. Fellate Pool Boy. Good doog, good doog.
My work is done here.
It's ok. You just don't "get it."
Whooooooshhhhhh
Neg rep me again, please, oh baby, make me cumcomewith your neg votes oh ohohohoh
Elaborate?
Sven got it.
Either way, my point remains: wanting Sark to be fired and knowing he will be fired based on performance are, for the most part, mutually exclusive. I found the post a bit wanting. I don't believe Sark will be fired this year, no matter what.
The rest was tongue.in.ass. -
I think an AC loss (plus the other two losses mentioned) would put Sark In the proverbial coffin. I used to think along the lines of Chest, but Woodtard is still making the same idiotic statements.
