The "Powerful" SEC

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

RoadDawg55 said:

SEC arguments are dumb because they have the most talent. They put the most players in the NFL and have the best program in football.

That said, their style of football is shit. I love this UW team so much because they do it all and actually shut down legitimate passing attacks. It's a much more entertaining brand of football.

I enjoy watching USC, Stanford, and Oregon (before this year). Oregon State will be fun to watch too. The PAC 12 has the best variety of teams and styles.

All of our defensive stats would be better in the SEC. It's amazing how bad most of the offenses in that conference are.

Colorado 10, Stanford 5

Alabama 10, LSU 0

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

PurpleThrobber said:

Tequilla said:

It's not a means to say that Alabama isn't good or that we're better ...

What it is intended to say/show is that when looking at Alabama's numbers, I do think that you have to take some of it with a grain of salt given that the other teams in the conference are a dumpster fire. I'm amused by this thought that Auburn is going to give Oklahoma a close game ... let's just say I'll be interested.

In general, my thoughts about the SEC as a whole is that it's not uncommon for them to run 9-10 guys up within 5-7 yards of the line of scrimmage. There's a lot of 1 yard and a cloud of dust as a result of how aggressive they are. On the other hand, there are a lot of big play opportunities that result from that ... particularly in the passing game. The SEC doesn't have a lot of good QBs in the league ... simple truth. Another thing that I see with the league and their defenses is that a lot of those big plays are created because of simply blown assignments ... motion can really fuck with them.

Turnovers are huge in the SEC ... occur at a far higher level than in the PAC.

They couldn't hold onto their slaves. How do you expect them to hold onto a football?

You mean like college football players?

I know you are being sarcastic but college football players worthless college education is worth 1.3 trillion dollars of debt for student loans.

Now if Bernie had made college free that scholarship would be worthless

Football players correlate to total student loan debt how exactly?

By not being a part of it because they get n education for playing football

So by not being a part of it, their pieces of paper are "worth" the $1.3 trill balance???

That's like a homeless person being "worth" the value of all the home loans in the country because he is "not a part" of the home owner community...

No

It isn't

You seem to be having a tough time here.

No, please tell us all how 85 scholarship football players per school is somehow equal to the remaining student population with loan debt.

It's not

Still don't get it I see

Thanks for admitting I was right.

I don't get the QB infatuation, give me a punter, some nasty Polys and running back.

I'm currently in SEC country - down here Christianity is the #2 religion behind college football

States like Alabama and Mississippi have no pro teams, no one in Tennessee gives a fuck about the Titans, etc.

LSU is it's own planet, and what the fuck is in Arkansas besides Civil War monuments and incest brothels ?

Historically the SEC has been pretty dominant

...of course Auburn boosters paying Cam Newton $180,000 for a few months work has something to do with that...

Most of us believe the conference is complicit in helping Bama cheat to stay on top...

But yes, "the conference" is clearly down this year, and quarterback play has been woeful...

How the fuck teams like Fla and LSU can't manage to get a QB is a true mystery...

And some normally stout defenses are surprisingly suckful...

And for the record - I fucking hate Bama and wanted Washington -

Like wearing Huskey gear to piss everyone off down here