Idiots are out protesting tonight
Comments
-
DerekJohnson said:doogsinparadise said:
Why shouldn't they go out and protest? The Republicans called Obama a traitor and a secret Muslim, so you can get fucked if you're going to turn around and ask for people to not insult Herr Trump.
Where would anyone get that crazy idea???
-
-
The electoral college is genius. One of its brilliant features is that it minimizes the damage from ballot stuffing. Of course ballot stuffing machine-Democrats would hate this.doogsinparadise said:The electoral college is a reactionary institution invented by the Framers as a tool to maintain white supremacy in the slave states.
-
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Looks like he actually did something about it in 2016. Instead of just complaining.UWhuskytskeet said:
What a concept. -
Scoreboard > total yards gained.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said:
-
Why do facts make you defensive?PurpleThrobber said:
Scoreboard > total yards gained.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Games won > total runs scoredPurpleThrobber said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.
The results under our current system do not equal the results under another. For example a voter in a state dominated by one party with no contentious local races or ballot issues may stay home knowing full well their vote isn't needed. There is more incentive to get out the vote in swing states because a single vote has more potential to swing an election there.
-
But how is the electoral college fucking retarded?Purple_Pills said:
Games won > total runs scoredPurpleThrobber said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.
The results under our current system do not equal the results under another. For example a voter in a state dominated by one party with no contentious local races or ballot issues may stay home knowing full well their vote isn't needed. There is more incentive to get out the vote in swing states because a single vote has more potential to swing an election there. -
Hillary beat Trump by 3.5 million votes in California, about three times her national lead.
The more you know, If I were a butthurt Hillary loser I'd want California to decide the election too.
But I'm not I'm a winner baby -
Hillary won the popular vote, genius.dnc said:doogsinparadise said:
Hillary didn't even get as many votes as Romney, so fuck her.
T-R-U-T-HCuntWaffle said:
P-R-E-S-S-I-N-Gdoogsinparadise said:The electoral college is a reactionary institution invented by the Framers as a tool to maintain white supremacy in the slave states.
Trump didn't even get as many votes as Romney, so fuck him.
Some of you just can't handle it. -
Trump won Michigan by 14,000 votes.
But how was this not a wave election again?
You should give Scott Walker and co a raise for all the hard work they put in on voter suppression. -
Popular vote means there aren't any state votes. Your vote would actually count for once, too.RaceBannon said:Hillary beat Trump by 3.5 million votes in California, about three times her national lead.
The more you know, If I were a butthurt Hillary loser I'd want California to decide the election too.
But I'm not I'm a winner baby -
Your vote would mean less. Under the current system Chicago can only piss in the Illinois pot with their ballot stuffing. In a national popular vote they would be pissing into the entire pool.UWhuskytskeet said:
Popular vote means there aren't any state votes. Your vote would actually count for once, too.
-
"Voter suppression" is Democrat code for "preventing election fraud." The Democrats know they need to cheat to maintain power.doogsinparadise said:
You should give Scott Walker and co a raise for all the hard work they put in on voter suppression. -
Sledog deserves the 3/5ths vote
-
Lack of free shit at tax payer expense causes less votes. Blacks used to be republicans too but 1964 fixed all that with the biggest free shit giveaway in history and the purchase of minority votes by Lyndon B. with our tax dollars.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
You simply couldn't hold back could youPitchfork51 said:Sledog deserves the 3/5ths vote
-
All you slack jawed faggot liberals need to go out and march with tears streaming down your face asking for handouts like the rest of these pussies. Get it all out then come back and get on with life. Even with all the voter fraud she still lost. She's a criminal people didn't want another criminal in office. Pretty simple. If you can't even cheat, steal, lie and buy the election your candidate is really a POS!
-
We've been through this, you whining bitches.UWhuskytskeet said:
But how is the electoral college fucking retarded?Purple_Pills said:
Games won > total runs scoredPurpleThrobber said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.
The results under our current system do not equal the results under another. For example a voter in a state dominated by one party with no contentious local races or ballot issues may stay home knowing full well their vote isn't needed. There is more incentive to get out the vote in swing states because a single vote has more potential to swing an election there.
Don't like the game, change the rules. Otherwise, lay back and enjoy the plungering and STFU.
-
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.Purple_Pills said:
Your vote would mean less. Under the current system Chicago can only piss in the Illinois pot with their ballot stuffing. In a national popular vote they would be pissing into the entire pool.UWhuskytskeet said:
Popular vote means there aren't any state votes. Your vote would actually count for once, too.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country. -
And every single fraudulent vote is added to the grand total too. More cheating = your vote means less.UWhuskytskeet said:
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country.
Of course Democrats hate the current system, it makes cheating very difficult. Under a popular vote system Chicago, Baltimore, and the other shithole Democrat machine cities would be stuffing the ballot boxes with thousands of illegals ballots. -
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.Purple_Pills said:
And every single fraudulent vote is added to the grand total too. More cheating = your vote means less.UWhuskytskeet said:
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country.
Of course Democrats hate the current system, it makes cheating very difficult. Under a popular vote system Chicago, Baltimore, and the other shithole Democrat machine cities would be stuffing the ballot boxes with thousands of illegals ballots.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/
I have no doubt you don't want people in cities voting, but it's not because of voter fraud. -
much racist crapSledog said:
Lack of free shit at tax payer expense causes less votes. Blacks used to be republicans too but 1964 fixed all that with the biggest free shit giveaway in history and the purchase of minority votes by Lyndon B. with our tax dollars.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Much truth. Hard to swallow but that's never stopped you before.AZDuck said:
much racist crapSledog said:
Lack of free shit at tax payer expense causes less votes. Blacks used to be republicans too but 1964 fixed all that with the biggest free shit giveaway in history and the purchase of minority votes by Lyndon B. with our tax dollars.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Comprehensive, my ass. Violated basic modal assumptions. Garbage in, garbage out.UWhuskytskeet said:
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.Purple_Pills said:
And every single fraudulent vote is added to the grand total too. More cheating = your vote means less.UWhuskytskeet said:
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country.
Of course Democrats hate the current system, it makes cheating very difficult. Under a popular vote system Chicago, Baltimore, and the other shithole Democrat machine cities would be stuffing the ballot boxes with thousands of illegals ballots.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/
I have no doubt you don't want people in cities voting, but it's not because of voter fraud.
#QsciSuperiorityGuy -
That's a myth. There were probably hundreds in King County alone this election. Very easy to do with our mail in ballot system.UWhuskytskeet said:
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.
The Democrats have to cheat to win & to maintain power. It is why they hate steps to prevent election fraud and why they want to scrap the hard to cheat electoral college.
-
You aren't basing that on any facts.Purple_Pills said:
That's a myth. There were probably hundreds in King County alone this election. Very easy to do with our mail in ballot system.UWhuskytskeet said:
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.
The Democrats have to cheat to win & to maintain power. It is why they hate steps to prevent election fraud and why they want to scrap the hard to cheat electoral college. -
