Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Idiots are out protesting tonight
Comments
-
We've been through this, you whining bitches.UWhuskytskeet said:
But how is the electoral college fucking retarded?Purple_Pills said:
Games won > total runs scoredPurpleThrobber said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.
The results under our current system do not equal the results under another. For example a voter in a state dominated by one party with no contentious local races or ballot issues may stay home knowing full well their vote isn't needed. There is more incentive to get out the vote in swing states because a single vote has more potential to swing an election there.
Don't like the game, change the rules. Otherwise, lay back and enjoy the plungering and STFU.
-
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.Purple_Pills said:
Your vote would mean less. Under the current system Chicago can only piss in the Illinois pot with their ballot stuffing. In a national popular vote they would be pissing into the entire pool.UWhuskytskeet said:
Popular vote means there aren't any state votes. Your vote would actually count for once, too.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country. -
And every single fraudulent vote is added to the grand total too. More cheating = your vote means less.UWhuskytskeet said:
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country.
Of course Democrats hate the current system, it makes cheating very difficult. Under a popular vote system Chicago, Baltimore, and the other shithole Democrat machine cities would be stuffing the ballot boxes with thousands of illegals ballots. -
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.Purple_Pills said:
And every single fraudulent vote is added to the grand total too. More cheating = your vote means less.UWhuskytskeet said:
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country.
Of course Democrats hate the current system, it makes cheating very difficult. Under a popular vote system Chicago, Baltimore, and the other shithole Democrat machine cities would be stuffing the ballot boxes with thousands of illegals ballots.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/
I have no doubt you don't want people in cities voting, but it's not because of voter fraud. -
much racist crapSledog said:
Lack of free shit at tax payer expense causes less votes. Blacks used to be republicans too but 1964 fixed all that with the biggest free shit giveaway in history and the purchase of minority votes by Lyndon B. with our tax dollars.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Much truth. Hard to swallow but that's never stopped you before.AZDuck said:
much racist crapSledog said:
Lack of free shit at tax payer expense causes less votes. Blacks used to be republicans too but 1964 fixed all that with the biggest free shit giveaway in history and the purchase of minority votes by Lyndon B. with our tax dollars.UWhuskytskeet said:
Republicans have lost 6 of the last 7 popular votes.2001400ex said:
Didn't Romney lose by millions of votes in the popular election?UWhuskytskeet said: -
Comprehensive, my ass. Violated basic modal assumptions. Garbage in, garbage out.UWhuskytskeet said:
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.Purple_Pills said:
And every single fraudulent vote is added to the grand total too. More cheating = your vote means less.UWhuskytskeet said:
No, one vote in Washington is equal to one vote in Illinois is equal to one vote in Alabama.
You're acting like it would make a difference if population was proportionally distributed across the country.
Of course Democrats hate the current system, it makes cheating very difficult. Under a popular vote system Chicago, Baltimore, and the other shithole Democrat machine cities would be stuffing the ballot boxes with thousands of illegals ballots.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/
I have no doubt you don't want people in cities voting, but it's not because of voter fraud.
#QsciSuperiorityGuy -
That's a myth. There were probably hundreds in King County alone this election. Very easy to do with our mail in ballot system.UWhuskytskeet said:
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.
The Democrats have to cheat to win & to maintain power. It is why they hate steps to prevent election fraud and why they want to scrap the hard to cheat electoral college.
-
You aren't basing that on any facts.Purple_Pills said:
That's a myth. There were probably hundreds in King County alone this election. Very easy to do with our mail in ballot system.UWhuskytskeet said:
Voter fraud is almost non-existent. Less than 31 in a billion.
The Democrats have to cheat to win & to maintain power. It is why they hate steps to prevent election fraud and why they want to scrap the hard to cheat electoral college. -
