Which assistant coaches
We all know the problem is the head coach but lets be realistic here for a minute and that is probably what Pool boy will require.
Comments
-
I like to ask different questions to answer the original question ...
If you were a new coach taking the job, what coaches on staff would you strongly consider keeping on staff?
All 4 of the defensive coaches you could make strong arguments for retaining.
You could make a strong argument for retaining Tui.
Taking recruiting out of the picture, you could make an argument for keeping Cozzetto. But you could probably find someone comparable (and that's before recruiting).
I couldn't think of a good reason to retain Kiseau, Nansen, or Poopoo or whatever his name is.
That basically tells you who SHOULD get fired.
As for Sark, no chance he fires Nansen ... if he survived the Holt firings, then you know there's a reason he's tied w/ Sark. -
If you keep anyone from the current staff, you deserve to be fired faster than Alabama fired Mike Price.Tequilla said:I like to ask different questions to answer the original question ...
If you were a new coach taking the job, what coaches on staff would you strongly consider keeping on staff?
All 4 of the defensive coaches you could make strong arguments for retaining.
You could make a strong argument for retaining Tui.
Taking recruiting out of the picture, you could make an argument for keeping Cozzetto. But you could probably find someone comparable (and that's before recruiting).
I couldn't think of a good reason to retain Kiseau, Nansen, or Poopoo or whatever his name is.
That basically tells you who SHOULD get fired.
As for Sark, no chance he fires Nansen ... if he survived the Holt firings, then you know there's a reason he's tied w/ Sark. -
Our defensive coaches are not the problem
-
Giving up 98 points and 1,200+ yards in two weeks is a problem.Tequilla said:Our defensive coaches are not the problem
In related news: Water is wet. -
El oh el.Tequilla said:Our defensive coaches are not the problem
-
-
I'll take the D staff and the RB coach. Everyone else can fuck off.Tequilla said:
I like to ask different questions to answer the original question ...
If you were a new coach taking the job, what coaches on staff would you strongly consider keeping on staff?
All 4 of the defensive coaches you could make strong arguments for retaining.
You could make a strong argument for retaining Tui.
Taking recruiting out of the picture, you could make an argument for keeping Cozzetto. But you could probably find someone comparable (and that's before recruiting).
I couldn't think of a good reason to retain Kiseau, Nansen, or Poopoo or whatever his name is.
That basically tells you who SHOULD get fired.
As for Sark, no chance he fires Nansen ... if he survived the Holt firings, then you know there's a reason he's tied w/ Sark. -
Nansen is the rb coach....
My guess is Tosh & Heyward be kept. Wilcox & Sirmon are a package deal and would probably look elsewhere. Mora might keep them but DeRuyter would not. -
When the PAC schedule is over, come back and tell me how many defenses gave up less than 45 points to Oregon. Bad example.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Giving up 98 points and 1,200+ yards in two weeks is a problem.Tequilla said:Our defensive coaches are not the problem
In related news: Water is wet.
Sark fucked the defense at ASU with a giant plunger in the first half. If Sark didn't have his head straight up his ass, the defense would have done a hell of a job to get to the locker room down 15-7 all things considered. -
TierbsHsotBoobs is giving you a great example of how you don't want to act when you're 40
