Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Need to find a pass rush next week

13

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!

    Seems kinda raysiss iyam.
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!



    Nobody watches the game and thinks, "We're barely ever getting to the QB, but at least it's not as bad as 2004."

    "That was a horrible ball by Browning, but I've seen Johnny DuRocher throw a worse pass."

    "I don't care that Van Winkle missed that FG because he's better than Michael Braunstein."

    "Budda Baker looked like a flailing hurdler at the special olympics on the long pass against Arizona, but I've seen Tripper Johnson look like an ever bigger retard.
    I don't agree. The long term trend is to recruit along what appears to be a racial profile of big guys with last names typical European Americans can't pronounce. Just saying that is not racist. Actually recruiting along racial lines is "racism" because there is what appears to be a preference for players meeting a certain ethnic profile. It's not racism to say that. I am not talking about field goal kickers or the special Olympics; your analogies fall flat. I'm saying they've been doing the same thing with the DL for about the last 15 or 16 years and in all this time we have had a disappointing pass rush. That is my point and it is spot on.
  • ExtraChrisB
    ExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,814

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!



    Nobody watches the game and thinks, "We're barely ever getting to the QB, but at least it's not as bad as 2004."

    "That was a horrible ball by Browning, but I've seen Johnny DuRocher throw a worse pass."

    "I don't care that Van Winkle missed that FG because he's better than Michael Braunstein."

    "Budda Baker looked like a flailing hurdler at the special olympics on the long pass against Arizona, but I've seen Tripper Johnson look like an ever bigger retard.
    I don't agree. The long term trend is to recruit along what appears to be a racial profile of big guys with last names typical European Americans can't pronounce. Just saying that is not racist. Actually recruiting along racial lines is "racism" because there is what appears to be a preference for players meeting a certain ethnic profile. It's not racism to say that. I am not talking about field goal kickers or the special Olympics; your analogies fall flat. I'm saying they've been doing the same thing with the DL for about the last 15 or 16 years and in all this time we have had a disappointing pass rush. That is my point and it is spot on.
    @NeedsMoreStringDawg, true?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!



    Nobody watches the game and thinks, "We're barely ever getting to the QB, but at least it's not as bad as 2004."

    "That was a horrible ball by Browning, but I've seen Johnny DuRocher throw a worse pass."

    "I don't care that Van Winkle missed that FG because he's better than Michael Braunstein."

    "Budda Baker looked like a flailing hurdler at the special olympics on the long pass against Arizona, but I've seen Tripper Johnson look like an ever bigger retard.
    I don't agree. The long term trend is to recruit along what appears to be a racial profile of big guys with last names typical European Americans can't pronounce. Just saying that is not racist. Actually recruiting along racial lines is "racism" because there is what appears to be a preference for players meeting a certain ethnic profile. It's not racism to say that. I am not talking about field goal kickers or the special Olympics; your analogies fall flat. I'm saying they've been doing the same thing with the DL for about the last 15 or 16 years and in all this time we have had a disappointing pass rush. That is my point and it is spot on.
    Yes, Saturday was poor, but our pass rush has been good to great since Kwatkowski got here.

    Polynesian DL weren't the problem.

    Coaching was the problem.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!

    Seems kinda raysiss iyam.
    Kinda?
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    Serious question:
    Is the Huskies' extreme reluctance to blitz likely a preference of Kwiatkowski, Petersen or both?

    This seems like the kind of big picture philosophy thing that isn't totally up to the DC, right?



  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    dnc said:

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!



    Nobody watches the game and thinks, "We're barely ever getting to the QB, but at least it's not as bad as 2004."

    "That was a horrible ball by Browning, but I've seen Johnny DuRocher throw a worse pass."

    "I don't care that Van Winkle missed that FG because he's better than Michael Braunstein."

    "Budda Baker looked like a flailing hurdler at the special olympics on the long pass against Arizona, but I've seen Tripper Johnson look like an ever bigger retard.
    I don't agree. The long term trend is to recruit along what appears to be a racial profile of big guys with last names typical European Americans can't pronounce. Just saying that is not racist. Actually recruiting along racial lines is "racism" because there is what appears to be a preference for players meeting a certain ethnic profile. It's not racism to say that. I am not talking about field goal kickers or the special Olympics; your analogies fall flat. I'm saying they've been doing the same thing with the DL for about the last 15 or 16 years and in all this time we have had a disappointing pass rush. That is my point and it is spot on.
    Yes, Saturday was poor, but our pass rush has been good to great since Kwatkowski got here.

    Polynesian DL weren't the problem.

    Coaching was the problem.
    There are a lot of good poly players. My point is more like there appeared to be for a long time that a player was recruited just because he was a big polynesian dude... what that appears to be is a bias based upon race. The other word for that is racism. I'm just calling it as it really is. The bored here is supposed to be for free speech. Probably saying we need more big fucking black guys is racist sounding. But what does it look like they are doing in the SEC SEC SEC SEC?

    Yes, the pass rush has improved. That was my original point above which was buried. I asked what you assholes were complaining about since it had improved!
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    I asked what you assholes were complaining about since it had improved!

    The complaints were specifically about the lack of pressure on the QB Saturday. Did you watch the damn game?

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!



    Nobody watches the game and thinks, "We're barely ever getting to the QB, but at least it's not as bad as 2004."

    "That was a horrible ball by Browning, but I've seen Johnny DuRocher throw a worse pass."

    "I don't care that Van Winkle missed that FG because he's better than Michael Braunstein."

    "Budda Baker looked like a flailing hurdler at the special olympics on the long pass against Arizona, but I've seen Tripper Johnson look like an ever bigger retard.
    I don't agree. The long term trend is to recruit along what appears to be a racial profile of big guys with last names typical European Americans can't pronounce. Just saying that is not racist. Actually recruiting along racial lines is "racism" because there is what appears to be a preference for players meeting a certain ethnic profile. It's not racism to say that. I am not talking about field goal kickers or the special Olympics; your analogies fall flat. I'm saying they've been doing the same thing with the DL for about the last 15 or 16 years and in all this time we have had a disappointing pass rush. That is my point and it is spot on.
    Yes, Saturday was poor, but our pass rush has been good to great since Kwatkowski got here.

    Polynesian DL weren't the problem.

    Coaching was the problem.
    There are a lot of good poly players. My point is more like there appeared to be for a long time that a player was recruited just because he was a big polynesian dude... what that appears to be is a bias based upon race. The other word for that is racism. I'm just calling it as it really is. The bored here is supposed to be for free speech. Probably saying we need more big fucking black guys is racist sounding. But what does it look like they are doing in the SEC SEC SEC SEC?

    Yes, the pass rush has improved. That was my original point above which was buried. I asked what you assholes were complaining about since it had improved!
    Hi there.

    We had a pass rush last year. And the year before.

    Hth.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    AIRWOLF said:

    Serious question:
    Is the Huskies' extreme reluctance to blitz likely a preference of Kwiatkowski, Petersen or both?

    This seems like the kind of big picture philosophy thing that isn't totally up to the DC, right?



    It's the preference of every coach (Excluding Todd Graham, of course). If you can get pressure without bringing more than 4 players you are at a decided advantage. Even better yet, if you have a secondary good enough that when you do bring 3/4 and still don't get to the QB that they can still hold a play to limited yards or force the QB to throw it away because there is no where to go, you have an even bigger advantage.