Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Need to find a pass rush next week

bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 14,918
First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
Standard Supporter
in Hardcore Husky Board
For the first time all year, UW will be going against a QB who is not a complete retard when it comes to throwing the ball. Same can be said for Darnold and Falk. As good as our secondary is, those guys will pick us apart in the mid-range game if we let them have 7-seconds to throw the ball because we're rushing 2 guys.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Options
    PineapplePiratePineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,012
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    - Cal's OLine will help give us a pass rush.
    - Cal has not faced a secondary like ours.
    - Cal has not faced a run game like ours.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    PineapplePiratePineapplePirate Member Posts: 4,012
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    edited October 2016
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    PineapplePirate said:

    - Cal's OLine will help give us a pass rush.
    - Cal has not faced a secondary like ours.
    - Cal has not faced a run game like ours.

    Disagree on last 2. They just played SC.
    You can make an argument for 3, with Utah, USC, San Diego State, but I still think our run game is better.

    USC's secondary better than UW?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,493
    First Anniversary 5 Fuck Offs 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Yea Cals OLine is garbage compared to Utahs who's held our line the entire time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    The pass rush this year has been better than usual. There really wasn't a pass rush since about the 2000 season up until lately at all, so what the fuck are you bitching about?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter
    Gladstone said:

    No more 3 man front bullshit.

    I'd be surprised if we see much else.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 4,305
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment
    Standard Supporter
    I've wondered whether we change our pass rushing strategy depending on the QB.

    Against Stanford, QB was a statue so go knock him down.

    Against Oregon and Utah, QB was more dangerous running than throwing, so don't break contain and then try to sack him.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    89ute89ute Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,454
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
    If Hansen is back you might have a game on your hands. They never reached the red zone on us but scored with the long ball.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,585
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    89ute said:

    If Hansen is back you might have a game on your hands. They never reached the red zone on us but scored with the long ball.

    Our secondary is a bit more stout than yours. Id be surprised if they do that.

    What is more likely is Cal gets unlimited 10 yard gains on slants and curls.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    cal's defense can't stop anyone. don't need a huge passrush. Get mathis back and disrupt just enough, UW should be able to escape with a 41-27 win or something
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    dhdawg said:

    cal's defense can't stop anyone. don't need a huge passrush. Get mathis back and disrupt just enough, UW should be able to escape with a 41-27 win or something

    I think you just contradicted yourself. You say UW doesn't need an improved pass rush, but then you state the need to get Mathis back. Get him back and the pass rush gets markedly better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 4,947
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    I was actually surprised by the Cal OL's pass protection against USC last week. USC has better talent across the bored, but Webb was rarely hit or hurried. Maybe he just has better pocket presence than Goff did, I dunno.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,947
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    bananasnblondes said:

    For the first time all year, UW will be going against a QB who is not a complete retard when it comes to throwing the ball. Same can be said for Darnold and Falk. As good as our secondary is, those guys will pick us apart in the mid-range game if we let them have 7-seconds to throw the ball because we're rushing 2 guys.

    2 guys getting held, tackled or clipped.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    Passion said:

    dhdawg said:

    cal's defense can't stop anyone. don't need a huge passrush. Get mathis back and disrupt just enough, UW should be able to escape with a 41-27 win or something

    I think you just contradicted yourself. You say UW doesn't need an improved pass rush, but then you state the need to get Mathis back. Get him back and the pass rush gets markedly better.
    that's not what I said. Don't need a huge pass rush, but it needs to be better than no passrush, which is what UW had this week
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,798
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker 5 Awesomes
    ApostleofGrief said:

    I don't see why you assholes are so touchy about my comment and buried my post. The pass rush has been lousy since Neuheisel started the practice of recruiting based on last name. If it was a name like Falahalawallawalla from Papua New Guinea you were on scholarship. But the fact is what is needed are big fucking mean black guys. Until you do that the pass rush is still going to be disappointing. But, this year has been better than usual. For years that has been utterly stagnant!!!

    Levi says hi!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    PurpleJPurpleJ Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,556
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    You mean it's difficult to get pressure on a real OL without sending linebackers?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.