Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PeterNorthDawg Calls Out Dawgman Censorship

BiggusDickusBiggusDickus Member Posts: 553
in Hardcore Husky Board
Gets the smug "huh?" treatment from F3 and Samek.
“[Woodward] forced Dawgman to control and stifle dissent on these boards. (I don’t blame Dawgman for that)”
http://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/poster-calls-out-censorship-on-dawgman/

HHBs, I think Fetters wants to know when he's ever censored comments at Doogman. Someone should help him out with this one.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

    I would love to see Kim go broke.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,358 Founders Club
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

    I would love to see Kim go broke.

    How much money could Kim be making off that site? He has to pay the Army of Tards, lots of travel expense, and 100 bucks a year, even with 1000 subs isn't exactly rolling in it. Granted, I don't know a ton about monetization with websites, so perhaps Fox pays them all something? Ad revenue?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BiggusDickusBiggusDickus Member Posts: 553
    Well, thus far I'm making exactly jack and shit from mine. Of course, I average 200 or so hits a day.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Swaye said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

    I would love to see Kim go broke.

    How much money could Kim be making off that site? He has to pay the Army of Tards, lots of travel expense, and 100 bucks a year, even with 1000 subs isn't exactly rolling in it. Granted, I don't know a ton about monetization with websites, so perhaps Fox pays them all something? Ad revenue?
    You have subscriptions and then ad revenue. I bet their income is entirely subscriptions. That kind of traffic would be worth a lot (for advertising) if it was on a porn, financial or health site. Sports site? Its worthless.

    I heard a while back they had 4,000. Maybe they have 5000 now. Scout probably gets half so lets assume revs of 25K/month. Scout probably pays for some of the expenses. A couple grand goes to Fetters & Ecklund, then Dave & Kim probably split the rest. Say they pay F&E 3K and have 4K of expenses then leaves 7500/mo for Kim.

    Don't think he will go broke anytime soon. It's a nice source of income but certainly quite small compared to Kim's ego.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 62,537 Founders Club
    Fetters has 20% share of ownership
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    We are making a pretty penny here. That's all I know.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chrisvashonchrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    edited October 2013
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    Swaye said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

    I would love to see Kim go broke.

    How much money could Kim be making off that site? He has to pay the Army of Tards, lots of travel expense, and 100 bucks a year, even with 1000 subs isn't exactly rolling in it. Granted, I don't know a ton about monetization with websites, so perhaps Fox pays them all something? Ad revenue?
    You have subscriptions and then ad revenue. I bet their income is entirely subscriptions. That kind of traffic would be worth a lot (for advertising) if it was on a porn, financial or health site. Sports site? Its worthless.

    I heard a while back they had 4,000. Maybe they have 5000 now. Scout probably gets half so lets assume revs of 25K/month. Scout probably pays for some of the expenses. A couple grand goes to Fetters & Ecklund, then Dave & Kim probably split the rest. Say they pay F&E 3K and have 4K of expenses then leaves 7500/mo for Kim.

    Don't think he will go broke anytime soon. It's a nice source of income but certainly quite small compared to Kim's ego.

    No way in hell they have 4,000 subscribers. Where did you hear that figure? On their busiest day they maybe have 350 people in chat. Assuming that's only 20% of subscribers (and I'm being generous), that's only 1,750.

    1,750 * 11 = $19,250/mth. Fox easily takes 50%. So now it's 9,250. And you need to feed Scott & Fatters, and whatever Samek gets.

    Remember Kim had a second job for a long time, and Ecklund has a second job. These guys are not getting rich.

    I mean, clearly Chris can't even afford a lap band surgery.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • loadsockloadsock Member Posts: 686
    Post a picture of a link sausage. Perhaps a picture of him in his Absolute Mustard shirt that is about 3xxx sizes too small. Those links would be fitting for that condescending prick.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    loadsock said:

    Post a picture of a link sausage. Perhaps a picture of him in his Absolute Mustard shirt that is about 3xxx sizes too small. Those links would be fitting for that condescending prick.

    Or post links to big sausage pizza and meatspin.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • loadsockloadsock Member Posts: 686
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    loadsock said:

    Post a picture of a link sausage. Perhaps a picture of him in his Absolute Mustard shirt that is about 3xxx sizes too small. Those links would be fitting for that condescending prick.

    Or post links to big sausage pizza and meatspin.
    I'm thinking of a picture of him waddling into Varlamo's Pizza before he sits down and murders an 18 inch meat lovers and a large basket of garlic bread.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TailgaterTailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    I don't believe that doogman.com is forced into anything by pool boy. Sorry, but I just don't. The doogman management and staff of insider experts simply aren't adversarial nor can they really be passionate about whether or not Husky Football ever again wins big or not where it counts on the scoreboard. Samek, Fetters, Grinalds, et al are not Dawgfans or fanatical about anything other than their web site. They are media entrepreneurs and have decided to rub-out any and all decent and negativism because that is what their doog customers want.

    Total losing as went on and on with Tyrone could not have been good for doogman.com's business, but recall that the site's management and staff while never complaining about Willingham also tolerated us negadawgs all the way until they decided that 7-6 Sark was good for their business and adversarial detractors and frontrunners such as us were not. It really in my opinion has nothing to do with some kind of working relationship doogman.com may have with pool boy....... It has everything to do with making certain the content on their site is as user friendly as they can make it for their preferred subscribers........ most of whom are not us or even close.

    Think about it. Most of the posters at doogman.com are not nearly as passionate as we are about Husky Football as it used to be and most of us want it to be again. The doogman staff cater to the doog style of fanaticism for mediocrity with overhyped bullshit about everything from Sark's recruiting to the propagandized X's and O's of Sark's football program. The doogman.com folks do this to drum up interest in a Husky Football program that shows up each season with a 7-6 or thereabouts quality and if it should happen to do better, then there's a prospect for more subscription sales so long as they can keep the sourness of reality and our negativism out of their product.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Doogman is totally in bed with Pool Boy. Derek even had an actual phone conversation with Kim about how they finally respect Doogman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • vadawgvadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 467 Swaye's Wigwam
    Should have said "access to the program" instead of "access to the site"....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGriefApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    Tailgater said:

    I don't believe that doogman.com is forced into anything by pool boy. Sorry, but I just don't. The doogman management and staff of insider experts simply aren't adversarial nor can they really be passionate about whether or not Husky Football ever again wins big or not where it counts on the scoreboard. Samek, Fetters, Grinalds, et al are not Dawgfans or fanatical about anything other than their web site. They are media entrepreneurs and have decided to rub-out any and all decent and negativism because that is what their doog customers want.

    Total losing as went on and on with Tyrone could not have been good for doogman.com's business, but recall that the site's management and staff while never complaining about Willingham also tolerated us negadawgs all the way until they decided that 7-6 Sark was good for their business and adversarial detractors and frontrunners such as us were not. It really in my opinion has nothing to do with some kind of working relationship doogman.com may have with pool boy....... It has everything to do with making certain the content on their site is as user friendly as they can make it for their preferred subscribers........ most of whom are not us or even close.

    Think about it. Most of the posters at doogman.com are not nearly as passionate as we are about Husky Football as it used to be and most of us want it to be again. The doogman staff cater to the doog style of fanaticism for mediocrity with overhyped bullshit about everything from Sark's recruiting to the propagandized X's and O's of Sark's football program. The doogman.com folks do this to drum up interest in a Husky Football program that shows up each season with a 7-6 or thereabouts quality and if it should happen to do better, then there's a prospect for more subscription sales so long as they can keep the sourness of reality and our negativism out of their product.


    It used to be fun in the old days, like 10 years ago. Actually I think this website is the most hopeful shot at "legitimizing" the online presence of more or less rational Washington fans. Most HHB sites don't last longer than a year or two. I think I gave up on doogman for good around 2010. It took a little while to get used to the near total lack of censorship. Some people are never going to be able to stand it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    F3 and Kum can spin it all they want but at the end of the day they make ends meet by running a message board thats stalks young boys.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    To chrisvashon,

    The vast majority of the members there do not post. I'm sure they have at least a few thousand members. Plenty of people have signed up and forgotten about it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    Before the season F3 posted that their subscriber base was about 5% the capacity of the stadium in a thread about entrance music. So 3500-4000 sounds about right unless he's making that up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.