PeterNorthDawg Calls Out Dawgman Censorship

BiggusDickus

Gets the smug "huh?" treatment from F3 and Samek.

“[Woodward] forced Dawgman to control and stifle dissent on these boards. (I don’t blame Dawgman for that)”

http://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/poster-calls-out-censorship-on-dawgman/

HHBs, I think Fetters wants to know when he's ever censored comments at Doogman. Someone should help him out with this one.

[Deleted User]

I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

I would love to see Kim go broke.

Swaye

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

I would love to see Kim go broke.

How much money could Kim be making off that site? He has to pay the Army of Tards, lots of travel expense, and 100 bucks a year, even with 1000 subs isn't exactly rolling in it. Granted, I don't know a ton about monetization with websites, so perhaps Fox pays them all something? Ad revenue?

BiggusDickus

Well, thus far I'm making exactly jack and shit from mine. Of course, I average 200 or so hits a day.

HeretoBeatmyChest

Swaye said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

I would love to see Kim go broke.

How much money could Kim be making off that site? He has to pay the Army of Tards, lots of travel expense, and 100 bucks a year, even with 1000 subs isn't exactly rolling in it. Granted, I don't know a ton about monetization with websites, so perhaps Fox pays them all something? Ad revenue?

You have subscriptions and then ad revenue. I bet their income is entirely subscriptions. That kind of traffic would be worth a lot (for advertising) if it was on a porn, financial or health site. Sports site? Its worthless.

I heard a while back they had 4,000. Maybe they have 5000 now. Scout probably gets half so lets assume revs of 25K/month. Scout probably pays for some of the expenses. A couple grand goes to Fetters & Ecklund, then Dave & Kim probably split the rest. Say they pay F&E 3K and have 4K of expenses then leaves 7500/mo for Kim.

Don't think he will go broke anytime soon. It's a nice source of income but certainly quite small compared to Kim's ego.

DerekJohnson

Fetters has 20% share of ownership

MikeDamone

We are making a pretty penny here. That's all I know.

chrisvashon

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Swaye said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I love how condescending those pricks are. I really hope this site can take off and I think it's going to especially if Sark is brought back after another terrible year.

I would love to see Kim go broke.

How much money could Kim be making off that site? He has to pay the Army of Tards, lots of travel expense, and 100 bucks a year, even with 1000 subs isn't exactly rolling in it. Granted, I don't know a ton about monetization with websites, so perhaps Fox pays them all something? Ad revenue?

You have subscriptions and then ad revenue. I bet their income is entirely subscriptions. That kind of traffic would be worth a lot (for advertising) if it was on a porn, financial or health site. Sports site? Its worthless.

I heard a while back they had 4,000. Maybe they have 5000 now. Scout probably gets half so lets assume revs of 25K/month. Scout probably pays for some of the expenses. A couple grand goes to Fetters & Ecklund, then Dave & Kim probably split the rest. Say they pay F&E 3K and have 4K of expenses then leaves 7500/mo for Kim.

Don't think he will go broke anytime soon. It's a nice source of income but certainly quite small compared to Kim's ego.

No way in hell they have 4,000 subscribers. Where did you hear that figure? On their busiest day they maybe have 350 people in chat. Assuming that's only 20% of subscribers (and I'm being generous), that's only 1,750.

1,750 * 11 = $19,250/mth. Fox easily takes 50%. So now it's 9,250. And you need to feed Scott & Fatters, and whatever Samek gets.

Remember Kim had a second job for a long time, and Ecklund has a second job. These guys are not getting rich.

I mean, clearly Chris can't even afford a lap band surgery.

MikeDamone

BiggusDickus said:

Gets the smug "huh?" treatment from F3 and Samek.

“[Woodward] forced Dawgman to control and stifle dissent on these boards. (I don’t blame Dawgman for that)”

http://northwestfootballfucktards.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/poster-calls-out-censorship-on-dawgman/

HHBs, I think Fetters wants to know when he's ever censored comments at Doogman. Someone should help him out with this one.

Fetters said "link?" It would be wrong to link this place. Wrong.

loadsock

Post a picture of a link sausage. Perhaps a picture of him in his Absolute Mustard shirt that is about 3xxx sizes too small. Those links would be fitting for that condescending prick.

TierbsHsotBoobs

loadsock said:

Post a picture of a link sausage. Perhaps a picture of him in his Absolute Mustard shirt that is about 3xxx sizes too small. Those links would be fitting for that condescending prick.

Or post links to big sausage pizza and meatspin.

loadsock

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

loadsock said:

Post a picture of a link sausage. Perhaps a picture of him in his Absolute Mustard shirt that is about 3xxx sizes too small. Those links would be fitting for that condescending prick.

Or post links to big sausage pizza and meatspin.

I'm thinking of a picture of him waddling into Varlamo's Pizza before he sits down and murders an 18 inch meat lovers and a large basket of garlic bread.

Tailgater

I don't believe that doogman.com is forced into anything by pool boy. Sorry, but I just don't. The doogman management and staff of insider experts simply aren't adversarial nor can they really be passionate about whether or not Husky Football ever again wins big or not where it counts on the scoreboard. Samek, Fetters, Grinalds, et al are not Dawgfans or fanatical about anything other than their web site. They are media entrepreneurs and have decided to rub-out any and all decent and negativism because that is what their doog customers want.

Total losing as went on and on with Tyrone could not have been good for doogman.com's business, but recall that the site's management and staff while never complaining about Willingham also tolerated us negadawgs all the way until they decided that 7-6 Sark was good for their business and adversarial detractors and frontrunners such as us were not. It really in my opinion has nothing to do with some kind of working relationship doogman.com may have with pool boy....... It has everything to do with making certain the content on their site is as user friendly as they can make it for their preferred subscribers........ most of whom are not us or even close.

Think about it. Most of the posters at doogman.com are not nearly as passionate as we are about Husky Football as it used to be and most of us want it to be again. The doogman staff cater to the doog style of fanaticism for mediocrity with overhyped bullshit about everything from Sark's recruiting to the propagandized X's and O's of Sark's football program. The doogman.com folks do this to drum up interest in a Husky Football program that shows up each season with a 7-6 or thereabouts quality and if it should happen to do better, then there's a prospect for more subscription sales so long as they can keep the sourness of reality and our negativism out of their product.

[Deleted User]

Doogman is totally in bed with Pool Boy. Derek even had an actual phone conversation with Kim about how they finally respect Doogman.

vadawg

Tailgater, you have zero idea what takes place there. They may not be getting told directly to "censor" the info, but the access to the site is held over their head on a daily basis in regards to what they allow to transpire on that website. In fact, Kim has said as much, but deleted the thread pretty quickly after admitting such.

vadawg

Should have said "access to the program" instead of "access to the site"....

ApostleofGrief

Tailgater said:

I don't believe that doogman.com is forced into anything by pool boy. Sorry, but I just don't. The doogman management and staff of insider experts simply aren't adversarial nor can they really be passionate about whether or not Husky Football ever again wins big or not where it counts on the scoreboard. Samek, Fetters, Grinalds, et al are not Dawgfans or fanatical about anything other than their web site. They are media entrepreneurs and have decided to rub-out any and all decent and negativism because that is what their doog customers want.

Total losing as went on and on with Tyrone could not have been good for doogman.com's business, but recall that the site's management and staff while never complaining about Willingham also tolerated us negadawgs all the way until they decided that 7-6 Sark was good for their business and adversarial detractors and frontrunners such as us were not. It really in my opinion has nothing to do with some kind of working relationship doogman.com may have with pool boy....... It has everything to do with making certain the content on their site is as user friendly as they can make it for their preferred subscribers........ most of whom are not us or even close.

Think about it. Most of the posters at doogman.com are not nearly as passionate as we are about Husky Football as it used to be and most of us want it to be again. The doogman staff cater to the doog style of fanaticism for mediocrity with overhyped bullshit about everything from Sark's recruiting to the propagandized X's and O's of Sark's football program. The doogman.com folks do this to drum up interest in a Husky Football program that shows up each season with a 7-6 or thereabouts quality and if it should happen to do better, then there's a prospect for more subscription sales so long as they can keep the sourness of reality and our negativism out of their product.

It used to be fun in the old days, like 10 years ago. Actually I think this website is the most hopeful shot at "legitimizing" the online presence of more or less rational Washington fans. Most HHB sites don't last longer than a year or two. I think I gave up on doogman for good around 2010. It took a little while to get used to the near total lack of censorship. Some people are never going to be able to stand it.

CuntWaffle

F3 and Kum can spin it all they want but at the end of the day they make ends meet by running a message board thats stalks young boys.

HeretoBeatmyChest

To chrisvashon,

The vast majority of the members there do not post. I'm sure they have at least a few thousand members. Plenty of people have signed up and forgotten about it.

section8

Before the season F3 posted that their subscriber base was about 5% the capacity of the stadium in a thread about entrance music. So 3500-4000 sounds about right unless he's making that up.

CuntWaffle

section8 said:

Before the season F3 posted that their subscriber base was about 5% the capacity of the stadium in a thread about entrance music. So 3500-4000 sounds about right unless he's making that up.

Dawgman.com would never just make stuff up, it just wouldn't be like them to do such a thing.